It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mnemeth1
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
Are you saying this electric Sun is just the Sun, or do you believe the whole Electric Universe theory?
I have recently seen this video and it makes a lot of since to me.
Thunderbolts of the gods video.google.com...#
An electric sun necessarily means an electric universe.
You can't have one without the other.
Originally posted by seataka
Yeah this stuff makes perfect sense here too but I may be "biased" cause I'm an old electronics guy...
........
Donald E. Scott LINK worked for General Electric (LSTG) in Schenectady, NY, and
Pittsfield, MA (Lightning Arrester Div.).
.......
And have you seen images of those iron meteorites? The ones with the melted holes in them. Those solid iron meteorites.. are pieces of the suns conductive iron surface...ejecta...if you will.. artifacts of extraordinary solar eruptions.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Originally posted by seataka
Yeah this stuff makes perfect sense here too but I may be "biased" cause I'm an old electronics guy...
........
Donald E. Scott LINK worked for General Electric (LSTG) in Schenectady, NY, and
Pittsfield, MA (Lightning Arrester Div.).
.......
And have you seen images of those iron meteorites? The ones with the melted holes in them. Those solid iron meteorites.. are pieces of the suns conductive iron surface...ejecta...if you will.. artifacts of extraordinary solar eruptions.
Don Scott also said something along the lines that since his tool is a hammer, everything starts to look like nails, except of course his tool is electrical engineering. And just because you have a hammer and everything starts to look like a nail, doesn't mean it IS a nail.
Yes I've seen iron meteorites with holes in them. Have you got a source you can post a link to so I can read more about how they were determined to be ejecta from the sun?
Originally posted by Orygun
This thread has been quiet for a while but the debate isn't over. As more and more evidence from different observations come in, the Big Bang theory seems to take a beating and the EU theory seems to keep getting stronger. Is the EU theory all fleshed out and fully ready? No. Is it ready for more direct experimental evidence? Yes.
Black holes, dark energy and dark matter all seem to be unobserved fairy tales that the Big Bang Theory requires. There are more fantasy objects in their theory but those three are the main ones. The EU doesn't require such religious belief.
One such fairy tale is how fusion powers the sun. The sun would have burnt out long ago if that was the fact. To explain away this uncomfortable fact, BB theorists say that gravitic compression has kept the sun alive and burning. While the fuel may be gone, the pressure of the gravity falling inward has kept us all safe. You see, they sent a man there, he dug a deep hole and found out all this information from his mining. Ha.
At some point, reasonable people will start looking at alternatives. It is time to dump the Big Bang Theory and look at alternatives. The EU is a good one. It may not be entirely correct, but so far it has done a pretty good job. For those who aren't sure, I strongly suggest bookmarking the TPOD at Thunderbolts to see what they have to say. If you don't, then you may fall off the edge of the Earth as it is flat you know.
www.thunderbolts.info...
If you were an electron, moving through intergalactic space towards the sun, what would you see? What would happen as you approach the sun? The first significant indication of the sun's presence that you would encounter is the sun's gravity. A slow moving electron could get caught up by that gravity, and become part of the "halo" that includes the Oort cloud, and probably extends about 1.5 light years from the sun. But a typical interstellar electron will be moving at about 20 km/sec with respect to the sun, well in excess of escape velocity, unless the electron finds its way to the inner solar system, so it's more likely that you would just cruise by and not notice. Of course, an electric sun hypothesizer would hypothesize that you would feel an attraction from the sun's excess positive charge, but we've already shown that to be unreasonable; if an electron at the orbit of the Earth feels no such force, how could one that is a light year away?
But if you are going in the right direction, you would encounter the sun's rather prodigious magnetic field. One of the first things a new physics student learns about electricity & magnetism is the "Lorentz Force", F = qE + V X B, which tells us that the vector force (F) on a charged particle is equal to the charge (Q) times the vector electric field (E) plus the vector cross product (X) of the particles velocity (V) relative to the magnetic field (B). A vector cross product has the peculiar property that it is perpendicular to the plane that includes the two vectors, in accordance to the right hand rule (in the case of V X B, curl the fingers of your right hand in the direction from V to B, through the smaller angle; your thumb points in the direction of the resultant vector). Hence, the force felt by the electron is perpendicular to its velocity V. So if you were an electron heading towards the sun, you would feel a force pushing you away from the sun, at right angles. In fact this is observed to happen where the solar wind encounters the Earth's magnetic field, and other planetary magnetic fields.
In order to bolster the argument, Scott quotes from Earl Milton's review of the notes left behind by the late civil engineer Raplh Juergens, purporting to show that there are enough electrons to power the sun as postulated. Juergen's assumed an extremely unrealistic velocity of about 105 meters per second (about 0.1 km/sec), when the real velocity is more like 20 km/sec, and he didn't consider dynamics, so he missed the escape velocity problem altogether. His assumption of 50,000 free electrons per cubic meter is not too far off from the more realistic 30,000. But his assumption of random velocity is entirely wrong, the electrons stream past the sun as the sun moves through the interstellar medium with its own peculiar relative velocity.
So even if the total number of electrons seems like enough for an electric sun, getting them to the sun is quite a chore, since they move in excess of escape velocity, and are pushed off by the magnetic field. But even if those electrons made it past the magnetic field, and pointed right at the sun so they wouldn't zip on by, they would still have to plow through the increasingly dense flow of the solar wind on its way out. And since the solar wind is made of charged particles, the incoming electrons would be buffeted by the electric fields of the protons and electrons of the solar wind, as well as the relativistic magnetic fields caused by the relative motion between the incoming electrons and the outgoing solar wind plasma, as well as the solar magnetic field that is embedded in the solar wind plasma, and moves outward at the same velocity.
All of these difficulties from plain physics, coupled with the fact that the alleged incoming electrons certainly appear to be not there, leave one to wonder why this is such a hot idea.
It may not be entirely correct, but so far it has done a pretty good job. For those who aren't sure, I strongly suggest bookmarking the TPOD at Thunderbolts to see what they have to say.
Our sun's sphere of influence, according to a series of papers published in Science on Oct. 16 detailing the initial results from the Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) satellite, seems instead to be a bubble that is cinched at the waist by a vast ribbon as seen by energetic neutral atoms — atoms that are not electrically charged, but are moving very fast through space — that are glowing 10 times more brightly than anyone had expected from anything in this region called the heliosphere. The textbook descriptions of the heliosphere, according to Science's accompanying news story, will have to be entirely rewritten.
IBEX provides "the first all-sky view of this region, and no one was expecting what we've seen," Crew says. Oddly enough, the energetic ribbon that circles the whole sky doesn't seem to follow the ecliptic (the plane in which all of the planets orbit). Nor does it follow the plane of the galaxy we inhabit, the Milky Way. "Who ordered this?" Crew exclaims. "It doesn't line up with anything!"
Originally posted by constantwonder
Just explain why you cant find an influx of electrons moving into the sun.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by mnemeth1
You skipped "constantwonder"s question:
Originally posted by constantwonder
Just explain why you cant find an influx of electrons moving into the sun.
Does, or does not electromagnetism require ELECTRONS?
At least, in areas and items made of matter.
In a nutshell, is this just a question of the "TOE", and the search for the "Unified Theory" as well?
What is happening here seems to be a misunderstanding about the fact we really, as yet, do not know exactly what 'light' is. ALL forms of radiation, that we collectively call the "EM Spectrum".
Not even sure WHAT an electron is. Lots of theories, stemming from observation, CERN, etc. We can describe it, the basic makeup, so far it is thought to be an "elementary" particle. BUT, it is still hard to pin down (literally). It is undeniably a fundamental component of matter, though. Still, although we know how to utilize it, observe it, have some limited control over it....it is still an enigma.
NOW....the question of just HOW light (or any other EM radiation) actually propagates through space? Another level of theoritical physics still being investigated.
Quantum theory. String theory. Branes. Just a few.
Oh...and a handful of extreme fringe types who came up with THIS 'electric universe' notion that fails in every logical and reasonable way imaginable. And doesn't ever rise to the level of a theory. Not sure if it qualifies even as a hypothesis. Hypotheses MUST have some sort of foundation behind them.....
It's just about the equivalent of saying the Moon is made of green cheese, and about as scientific.
Even as a layperson, with a lack of the details...I am able to watch and read about science, and learn a little....