It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mnemeth1
So, you're saying the corona reaches temperatures of millions of degrees, while the surface of the Sun stays at a relatively cool 6000 degrees, because magnetic arcs exist on the surface of the Sun?
Interesting.
I was unaware that heat could be transfered through magnetic arcs - and that magnetic arcs could exist at all without a flow of charged particles (something engineers like to call an electric current).
Your claims fall short of describing how the corona could be so hot while the surface is so cool. Even standard cosmologists accept this. You're not going to find a single published paper accounting for all the heat generated in the corona by a standard cosmologist. They don't have any answers.
Originally posted by platoslab
Originally posted by mnemeth1
So, you're saying the corona reaches temperatures of millions of degrees, while the surface of the Sun stays at a relatively cool 6000 degrees, because magnetic arcs exist on the surface of the Sun?
Interesting.
I was unaware that heat could be transfered through magnetic arcs - and that magnetic arcs could exist at all without a flow of charged particles (something engineers like to call an electric current).
Your claims fall short of describing how the corona could be so hot while the surface is so cool. Even standard cosmologists accept this. You're not going to find a single published paper accounting for all the heat generated in the corona by a standard cosmologist. They don't have any answers.
The arcs reach all the way to the corona.
I am saying the current originates from the Sun's iron core and travels through the arcs. Arcs get thinner due to gravity thereby creating conditions conducive to high energy discharge. X-rays and gamma rays have been observed. This is not standard cosmology, my previous posts in this thread do not support the standard model.
Here are scientific sources that support such discharges:
Z-machine acheives 2 billion degrees kelvin:
focusfusion.org...
NASA's official explanation(notice how they ignore metallic content):
www.nasa.gov...
University of Maryland www.astro.umd.edu...
[edit on 18-12-2009 by platoslab]
It is a physical impossibility for the Sun's surface to be 6000k while the corona is 2 million K and to have that heat originate at a point internal to the Sun.
>> The Sun’s plasma sheath. The white curve shows how the voltage changes within the solar plasma as we move outward from the body of the Sun. Positively charged protons will tend to “roll down the hills.” So the photospheric tuft plasma acts as a barrier to limit the Sun’s power output. The plateau between (b) and (c) and beyond (e) defines a normal quasi-neutral plasma. The chromosphere has a strong electric field which flattens out but remains non-zero throughout the solar system. As protons accelerate down the chromospheric slope, heading to the right, they encounter turbulence at (e), which heats the solar corona to millions of degrees. The small, but relatively constant, accelerating voltage gradient beyond the corona is responsible for accelerating the solar wind away from the Sun. Credit: W. Thornhill (after W. Allis & R. Juergens), The Electric Universe.
Originally posted by mnemeth1
reply to post by platoslab
Do you just ignore everything I write?
Did you happen to miss the several posts I made claiming the Sun is nothing more than a z-pinch from currents of plasma?
[edit on 18-12-2009 by mnemeth1]
Originally posted by malcr
Now wrt electric sun. I don't need to investigate this since it fails the common sense test. If the sun was powered externally then all of the apparent power(energy) of the sun has to be external and that is a fricking lot of energy, electrical or not. With that amount of electrical energy flowing in I think it would have been notice even by the satellite makers as their equipment was fried! The source is either concentrated/funnelled in or spread out. If the former then there is a huge glow somewhere?!?! If the latter then the shaded side of earth would be bombarded with electrical energy and those satellites would be suffering. Finally where is the source of the electrical energy?
Originally posted by Hastobemoretolife
Although does anybody have an explanation for why satellites don't get fried when floating through space? That is a pretty good question one that we might not know the answer too.
Originally posted by mnemeth1
reply to post by Arbitrageur
I think the common sense test is failed when scientists declare the sun is a big ball of burning hydrogen, yet its surface is over 300 times colder than its atmosphere.