posted on Dec, 15 2009 @ 10:21 PM
reply to post by Doomsday 2029
What more proof do you need than Roswell?
We had disclosure about that in 1994 and 1997 and a lot of people think that's a deception.
So why will any other disclosures be different than that one?
What Jesse Marcel described sounds very much like project Mogul debris to me but some people still refuse to believe it even after disclosure about
If the disclosure doesn't match someone's personal fantasy then people will find a way to disbelieve it.
On the other hand that disclosure included the admission that we had been lied to for 50 years so we would be foolish to believe everything we are
told after that. My own personal guess as to what is yet to be disclosed is that they have been investigating UFOs more than they admit, and the cases
not attributed to secret projects, they probably don't have any more idea what they are than we do and that's what they are keeping secret, like the
JAL1628 incident for example. Nobody really knows for sure what the heck that was though some people like me have some theories.
I think what they don't want to admit is that things have happened in supposedly secure airspace they can't explain, and that's why we don't have
full disclosure of the non-military cases.
Regarding disclosure of secret military projects, well we just had another one of those in
[edit on 16-12-2009 by Arbitrageur]