It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Aug 8 2009 Arlington Texas UFO - A MASSIVE coverup

page: 5
62
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 05:20 AM
link   
UFO does not mean alien craft, could just be one of those black op thingys. Never trust the gobmint IMHO.


I meant gobermint
gubbermint

[edit on 12/16/2009 by dirtydog]


[edit on 12/16/2009 by dirtydog]




posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 05:27 AM
link   
They most assuredly would not transport a UFO (or anything close to this nature, including top secret projects) uncovered. The idea that they were ill-prepared and couldn't cover the thing due to lack of time and preparation is preposterous.

But do they transport components of jets uncovered as well? And do they do so with the hustle bustle described in the policeman's story?

I really don't know what to think as the elements in the video conflict. The object is uncovered which would imply that it is not so secretive nor precious enough to protect (both from physical damage and from prying eyes).

Yet... there is a convoy for the objects.



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 05:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by Mr_skepticc
If you blow up those images, you can plainly see the outline of the jet a lot better, the front is facing the camera.


so what we are seeing in the photos is the 2nd image down on here?

www.jsf.mil...



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 05:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by Pryde87
Ahh yea I missed that! Hmmm I still dont buy it though. It just seems a bit too clumsy to be the work of a government coverup


I disagree. There is basically no mention/video of the incident anywhere. Combine this with the radio station's recant of events, and what you have is an effective coverup, REGARDLESS of what the object was.



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 05:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by itstheendoftheworldaswekn

Originally posted by Chuck C
Does anyone care to tell me why the military wouldn't invest in a tarp to cover this thing, and secure the tarp to the sides of the trailer? It just seems odd that they would allow something secretive to be seen at all by civillians on the road.


I have to say this is the first thing that came into my head. How bloody hard it is to get a tarp. Even to cover some of it. For petes sake. This is a farce.




Peace



My thoughts exactly, If they had time to source a truck and a flat bed trailer ( which don't tend to be just hanging out on the edge of the interstate waiting for such an event ) then im pretty damn sure they could get a tarp to cover the "present nice and neat". And don't these trucks tend to have a tarp with them in the 1st place. I want to believe as much as the next guy but come on........ credit to the OP for bringing this case back up , but the "evidence" gives us more questions than answers.



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 05:42 AM
link   
Here is the f-35c, which is the model they are testing down there in Dallas, this is what it would look like with it's wings and back tale fin removed for transport.




Look familiar folks?

Original photo


[edit on 16-12-2009 by Mr_skepticc]

And here is the f-35c where the wings would have been taking off correctly.



[edit on 16-12-2009 by Mr_skepticc]



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 05:44 AM
link   
Hmmm... to play devils advocate again... they could have left it uncovered for a variety of reasons, the craft could have been very hot and a tarp would melt or catch fire, or they didn't want to contaminate the craft with all the fibres of a tarp, But….as someone just posted, would they leave an aircraft uncovered even if it was used for tests and in bit's? they would cover it to stop any debris falling off it onto the road surely, I see big pieces of equipment being brought to my work all the time and they are ALWAYS covered up, (mind you I do live in England and it tends to rain lot's here)



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 05:44 AM
link   
reply to post by Mr_skepticc
 


Do they transport these things uncovered?



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 05:51 AM
link   
reply to post by Mr_skepticc
 


Maybe I need an explanation on how to see what you're seeing but in your example of the f35 the cockpit clearly rises substantially higher than the wings. I see no rise in the picture of the object in question.
Also when I look at Bspiracy's blowup pics of I come to the same conclusion. I would have to say that's not an f35.



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 05:51 AM
link   
reply to post by astronomine
 



Well I figure it was brought in by the airport, and taken down the facilty where they state on their website, starting in 2010 they would be testing them for durabilty. It was early morning, not many folks out, they brought the police in for escorting it for safety, so whats the biggie, you know tons of people saw this, but yet theres nothing out there about it really, Because people seen it was a jet.

[edit on 16-12-2009 by Mr_skepticc]



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 05:53 AM
link   
reply to post by Majestic RNA
 


That could be a reason as to why there is no tarp, but with the same reasoning would something so volatile be hoisted right up onto a flatbed?

Perhaps it very well was an exercise as explained in the men in suits from the story... not only an exercise to practice police cooperation but also to gauge public reaction.

Starting to lean towards the jet but would like to know if they really are transported in such a manner.

To the OP, thanks for bringing this intriguing story back!



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 05:56 AM
link   
reply to post by astronomine
 


The only two images that are of this event are the two jpgs. The video is of another convoy of a different item, and months earlier. They throw that video in to confuse people...

As I said, one person posted a video of this event and it was taken down supposedly due to a "terms of use violation" -- our gubbament at work.



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 05:56 AM
link   
reply to post by heyo
 


Remember the pics I have are an illustration, and the angle of the pictures taken of the jet on the road are from kinda underneath it, I admitt its just a tad off, but with the lighting and angle, you can see where this is a jet. Also look close at the original pic, you can see what looks like intake exhaust in the front middle.


Note: People claim the goverment has went through great lenghts to keep aliens and ufos a secret for many years, so why would they haul it right down a main interstate, wide open for everyone with a cell phone to snap pictures and say " heres the proof" Because it was jet and noone cared.

[edit on 16-12-2009 by Mr_skepticc]



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 05:58 AM
link   
reply to post by Mr_skepticc
 


I would think that they would have some very strict procedures when transporting such sensitive and valuable cargo. Wouldn't the procedures be followed as textbook as possible?

If they do transport jet components like in the pictures in question, that would go a long way to explaining the lack of commotion involving this subject in regards to eyewitnesses and blogging and such.



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 05:59 AM
link   
looks like a X Files season One scenario to me. Only the truck was disguised as civilian with no escort.

Maybe the UFO was property of the government, and during one of its sorties, the pilot got in trouble somehow. If we are trying to understand a technology which is not ours I assume mistakes of all sorts happen and therefore need a cover-up. Follow my theory ?



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 06:00 AM
link   
reply to post by astronomine
 


Simple, they were in a hurry and they had the cover of dark.

If they were just transporting a plane they would not have swooped in and grabbed Dallas police real fast.

They had something "HOT" both literally and figuratively and they needed to get it out of there and fast.



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 06:01 AM
link   
reply to post by expat2368
 


Yes, thanks, I got the distinction now


Interested to see how this develops as I would LOVE for it to be something more.



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 06:03 AM
link   
reply to post by astronomine
 


Like I said, it was brought in to the airport on military cargo plane, they hauled it down to the facility. Remember these jets are to be dropped from high heights, to test their durabilty starting at the first of the year. That means these jets are not the full f-35c, they have been stripped of a lot of stuff, and are just dummies for the testing. You can read all about it on their webpage that I have put in previous post on this thread.



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 06:05 AM
link   
reply to post by Mr_skepticc
 


Actually after looking at it more, I think I can see the cockpit, or what looks like it. Imo this is an aircraft.
Good job on your participation in this thread btw.



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 06:08 AM
link   
reply to post by MattMulder
 


It very well could have been a reverse engineered craft piloted by one of our people that got in trouble and had to land on a road.

The big question is "who are they hiding it from?" Answer: US because you can be 100% certain the Russians and every other government in the world know we have it and what its capabilities are.

So why are they hiding these things from US? They use antigravity and energy sources that are far superior to anything we have been told about. Too many big dogs making too much money on OIL to let that cat out of the bag. Its all about MONEY and CONTROL!



new topics

top topics



 
62
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join