Syria says they will defend Iran if Israel strikes

reply to post by mrmonsoon


"Itar-Tass, the Russian news agency announced yesterday that it will station part of its Black Sea fleet in Tartous, in the Syrian coast of the Mediterranean"

this was more than a year ago... sept 13th, 2008. so i am not sure if they are still there or what the deal is with that..

reply to post by Misoir

This is interesting. If one believes that Syria had a nuke site destroyed, and Iran didn't defend Syria. Well.............who the hell do you believe?

Oh, yes, Syria will sacrifice itself for Iran.

reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler

Yet you John defended the police and downplayed your government’s own reactions to peaceable demonstrators.

You need to gain a little perspective.

I went on a peaceful protest recently in London, and all the police, even including the helicopter were very professional in their job, and did not harrass any of the protestors, or drop acid onto them from the chopper! Have you been on a protest march, and seen the amount of police work that goes into them? Do you actually ever get out, or do you just stay at home and revel in the old rehashed islamic propaganda. You should add references for most of your comments because they probably originated in the islamic republic.

You should know by now if you were paying attention that it's not about one girl that has been shot in Iran. Neda is a symbol to represent all the suffering because her video is the most shocking.

And back to London - I never said that the police officer acted responsibly where someone died in the G20 protests, and I never defended the actions of those individuals.

You do realise that there are rogue cops everywhere, and even army officers who drive tanks into shops in Russia after a bottle of vodka! Those kinds of actions alone taken by these few individuals does not prove that the majority of law enforcers abuse their power, or that they are ordered to behave that way.

Here's a video of cops tazing a man repeatedly even when he's lying on the ground from the UK:



I'm not denying that these acts of crime occur, although they are not commonplace and not sanctioned by the government.

As I said earlier in this thread: Basij shooting protestors from rooftops sanctioned by the coup d'etat regime versus rogue police-officers. Can you deny the difference in the root cause of the problem between the two? And Khamenei did publicly give orders to kill protestors when he said to crush the velvet revolution back in June this year.

This is an interesting read, and explains why the revolutionary guards cannot just kill every protestor on sight, like the Chinese have often done, because even Khamenei knows that the army will not stand by, and the resulting conflict would engulf and probably destroy the islamic republic:

Military Mutiny in Iran?

Speed and brutality are the key aspects of the China model. Why does Khamenei not activate this model?

This summer he did consider this, before he became ill. He even gave carte blanche for the arrest of opposition leader Mousavi. But Khamenei has subsequently stopped its implementation. Why? Because he had been told that this would provoke an explosion that would likely engulf him and his regime.

Revolutionary Guards

At the time, I also heard another reason, which, if true, would be the main reason. There are serious doubts about the military itself. The army and parts of the Revolutionary Guards (abbreviated as RG) would, under those circumstances, choose the side of the opposition and the people. The military power of Khamenei would be broken. This, however, was speculation without proof.

Now there is evidence to support it. On December 10, a statement signed by a number of officers and commanders of the Iranian army was released. The regular army of Iran had not been involved in the suppression of the population. The statement was signed by:

* Pilots and personnel of the aviation division of the regular army (Havanirooz)
* Commanders and personnel of the 31th artillery division of Isfahan of the regular army
* Pilots and airmen of the regular army
* Teachers of the Shaid Satari University of the regular air force
* Officers and staff of the logistics training unit the regular army
* Professors and lecturers of the Imam Ali University for officers of the regular army
* Officers, staff, and commanders of the chief of staff of the regular army

Ask yourself why would the islamic regime have its own revolutionary guards if it trusted the army??? The only reason is because they didn't trust the army, and still don't!

Now let's look at the rest of your gibberish comments:

The difference is when it happens in London at the G-20 Climate Camp you can understand it because its your town and your police and issues that make sense to you.

Utterly ridiculous and untrue.

Like a good little programmed citizen you defend your government’s heavy handed and violent actions even when it leads to the death of an innocent man like it did at London’s G-20.

And this part is even more silly full of the same pretentious nonsense. If there were videos of British cops shooting kids from rooftops on youtube, there would be reason for comparison. But there isn't.

When it happens in Iran though a place you don’t live in a culture you don’t understand by people who belong to a religion you don’t respect then well…different story, it’s barbaric and deadly ruthless behavior by a despotic government.

So now I don't understand Iranian culture! Aren't you being a little bit presumptious there! You're the one being disrespectful with these outlandish comments, to many many people.

I don't see how anyone can justify rooftop shootings of kids, raping men and women, all in the name of religion - that is my opinion, where it is my opinion that all civilised human beings should agree entirely with that. But since the facts are the most important, here is one: These kinds of atrocities are even illegal in the Islamic republic's own constitution, and the army and airforce may appear ready to stand with the people against the illegal coup d'etat regime's revolutionary guards.

The reality is there is NO DIFFERENCE between protests in London and how the British authorities deal with them and protests in Tehran and how Iranian authorities deal with them other than people’s own skewered perceptions and double standards.

Really, where on earth have you been, and what planet have you been residing on? What is point of discussing this with someone so ignorant as you! I really have been wasting my time replying to you, and I won't be wasting any more.

[edit on 15-12-2009 by john124]

I think the reason this is so important is not just because the Syrian military will be involved with attacking Israel and defending Iran but that with Syria helping Iran that is easy acces into Syrian land and air space which Iran could use to invade Israel by land or attack by air.

this link was interesting turkey also threatned to

www.jpost.com...

A lot of talk from Iran. Weekly updates on their weapons acquisitions, progress on their nuclear program, how the Zionist bug must be squashed (a mistranslation, of course), how the US is blocking the return of the 12th Imam.

Less talk on their support of Hamas, Hezbollah, Syria, ant-government fores in Iraq, Yemen, elsewhere.

Reassuring when they talk. Always good to see people doing what the're best at.

As for military track record since the Islamic Revolution: kept at bay in their Holy War against a much smaller Iraqi military, where a million Iranians died including children. Top battalion of 100 sent to fight the Evil Zionists in Gaza earlier this year. None returned.

Employment of funded, armed and supplied proxies in Gaza, Lebanon, Iraq. No positive results. An admittedly dysfunctional airforce dependent on outdated Russian equipment and weaponry.

Meanwhile at home the population has doubled since the Revolution. Money and entrepreneurship have fled. Bitter infighting among the already divided Mullahs, Revolutionary Guard, various Councils, now the military.

Much sorely in need of upgrading within the country, particularly the oil producing infrastructure. New industry needed to resolve chronic unemployment, agricultural reforms, technology, education.

The world is not so much opposed to Iran or other Middle Eastern coutries having nuclear potential - just not this current regime. The Russians, Saudis, EU, Jordan, Egypt, feel the same way.

Iran could do very well for itself in the coming years. not totally clear what a compromised or even destroyed Israel would do for the 75 million people in Iran. And those people aren't quite sure either.

Though much self congratulation, there is little evident of how Iran is a better contry than it was when the Islamic Revolution was initiated. The standard of living has declined, alliances have been severed, prospects are few.

General impression is most of the world, most Iranians, would like to see a housecleaning in the highest level of government. Hopefully change will come from within.

Originally posted by Misoir
I think the reason this is so important is not just because the Syrian military will be involved with attacking Israel and defending Iran but that with Syria helping Iran that is easy acces into Syrian land and air space which Iran could use to invade Israel by land or attack by air.

That's if they can get as far as Syria from Iran before getting bombed or shot down.

Originally posted by TheCoffinman
reply to post by mrmonsoon

 

"Itar-Tass, the Russian news agency announced yesterday that it will station part of its Black Sea fleet in Tartous, in the Syrian coast of the Mediterranean"

this was more than a year ago... sept 13th, 2008. so i am not sure if they are still there or what the deal is with that..

That's Russia move to secure their interest in Caspian Sea basin. And it's a fact Russia wont "allow" US/Israeli tanks/ships get near it. That is what Russia's moves show. If you paid attention to war from last last Russia-Georgia 5 day war. You will find that as soon as USA and Israel supplied spy drones and anti-aircraft weaponry to Georgia to be used against Iran for intelligence gathering motive there was an war between Russia and Georgia.

Russia completely destroyed Georgia's anti-aircraft and other equipment provided by USA and confesticated all spy drones provided by Israeli's.
It was in 1967 that the Soviet Navy started using this Syrian port as one of its main Mediterranean stations. I can provide you with links confirming all this but it would be great if you do a search yourself first and dig a bit deeper.

Back in Soviet times about nine Russian warships used to be on constant service in the port of Tartus.

With the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia withdrew its ships from the region, but the relations never faded. During the past few years the Russian ships of the Black Sea Fleet have started visiting Syria again. At the beginning of this year, for the first time in 13 years, the fleet dropped anchor in Tartus.

Many see it as a sign that Russia could be seeking to revive its naval influence in the region.

Excellent replies to the OP, thanks all. Does anyone remember an excellent movie “The Sum of All Fears back in 2002”? One only need to replace the neo-fascists elements with the Zionists to get the better and more accurate views of the future if they choose to be foolish with their usual black-ops wizardry to start the nuclear wars.

The sum of all fears

reply to post by john124


You're joking right,you're joking. What people are khomeni torturing bring the proofs without sying rubbish, i thought that was a universal rule. I want to see that. Moving on, the 20% muslims living in israel are not living peacefully, you are only saying that becayse fox, cnn, and other jewish owned media stations doesn't want that news to come out. Once again you're being brain washed. If i my memory seves me right, in jerusalem the only time all three religions prospered and were actually making strides was when the muslims controlled the territory. When the christians controlled jerusalem, they murdered everyone who was not christian and kicked them out. On the other hand, when the muslims had full control they didn't kick them out or murder anyone they simply let the christians and jews live in harmony, and that my friend is the only time the three religions lived in peace. You never hear of anything bad happening in israel becuase the new stations you watch is being controlled by the jews, you want a percentage, ok try 96% of the world's media.

reply to post by HappilyEverAfter


You summed it up perfectly, israel is a monster created by the u.s, and not even the u.s os going to stop it. Israel will lead the world to WW3, and believe me if that happens, u.s is going down the toilet as it already is, and it will be basically the world and the middle east fighting with israel and when israel's nuclear weapons run out, then oh oh, the monster is trapped. In other words, israel is the threat to start WW3, not iran,syria, or iraq. This can't even be argued about. Israel is waiting for their messiah, and their waiting for a reason to use their nuclear weapons, any reason possible to start WW3. Well believe me when that happens, israel will be a big problem, as it already is. The only way to stop israel is by first waiting for the u.s to go bankrupt, then it's the world vs. israel. Just remember guys that this monster was created by the u.s and they had their chance and ample time to stop this creation, but guess what! it's too late.

Originally posted by pujols5
When the christians controlled jerusalem, they murdered everyone who was not christian and kicked them out.

The British assumed control of the territory 1919 to 1948. Do you have any documentation of them murdering everyone? How do you kick out dead people? Historians, records, census figure people living there did not see this.

You never hear of anything bad happening in israel becuase the new stations you watch is being controlled by the jews, you want a percentage, ok try 96% of the world's media.

This number of 96% of the world's media has been thrown out without any substantiation. Many recognized Jewish Hollywood and TV producers, directors, actors. But any check of who owns or has controlling interest in broadcast, print, film media worldwide does not show a particularly high Jewish percentage.

What are your information sources?

[edit on 16-12-2009 by mmiichael]

Originally posted by mmiichael

Originally posted by pujols5
When the christians controlled jerusalem, they murdered everyone who was not christian and kicked them out.

The British assumed control of the territory 1919 to 1948. Do you have any documentation of them murdering everyone? How do you kick out dead people? Historians, records, census figure people living there did not see this.

You never hear of anything bad happening in israel becuase the new stations you watch is being controlled by the jews, you want a percentage, ok try 96% of the world's media.

This number of 96% of the world's media has been thrown out without any substantiation. Many recognized Jewish Hollywood and TV producers, directors, actors. But any check of who owns or has controlling interest in broadcast, print, film media worldwide does not show a particularly high Jewish percentage.

What are your information sources?

[edit on 16-12-2009 by mmiichael]

Go back a little further in history and you will find that muslims trated christians and jews with peace and it was the christians who treated and killed innocent lives.Muslims also recognized the rights of Christians and Jews who hold the city dear to their hearts and sacred in their faiths.
Under Islamic rule they were given permission to settle there. When the Caliph Umar made the treaty with the Christian Patriarch Sophronius it was agreed, at the requestof the Christian patriarch, that "No Jews will live with them in Aelia (Jerusalem)."But later, due to Muslim tolerance, this rule was relaxed and Jews were allowed to come and settle in the city.
After the re-conquest of Jerusalem by Salahuddin in the time of the Crusades, Jews were again permitted by Muslims to come back and live in the city. The Crusaders during their 90-year rule (1099 - 1187) had banned both Jews and Muslims from that city.

Originally posted by pujols5
Go back a little further in history and you will find that muslims trated christians and jews with peace and it was the christians who treated and killed innocent lives.Muslims also recognized the rights of Christians and Jews who hold the city dear to their hearts and sacred in their faiths.
Under Islamic rule they were given permission to settle there. When the Caliph Umar made the treaty with the Christian Patriarch Sophronius it was agreed, at the requestof the Christian patriarch, that "No Jews will live with them in Aelia (Jerusalem)."But later, due to Muslim tolerance, this rule was relaxed and Jews were allowed to come and settle in the city.
After the re-conquest of Jerusalem by Salahuddin in the time of the Crusades, Jews were again permitted by Muslims to come back and live in the city. The Crusaders during their 90-year rule (1099 - 1187) had banned both Jews and Muslims from that city.

Uh, excuse me. My calendar show it's 2009. Have you any references to things that have happened in the last 900 years?

The world has changed a lot.


M

[edit on 16-12-2009 by mmiichael]

You want proof for the jews owning the media and tv. You got it pal.

The largest media conglomerate today is Walt Disney Company, whose chairman and CEO, Michael Eisner, is a Jew. The Disney Empire, headed by a man described by one media analyst as a “control freak,” includes several television production companies (Walt Disney Television, Touchstone Television, Buena Vista Television), its own cable network with 14 million subscribers, and two video production companies.

As for feature films, the Walt Disney Picture Group, headed by Joe Roth (also a Jew), includes Touchstone Pictures, Hollywood Pictures, and Caravan Pictures. Disney also owns Miramax Films, run by the Weinstein brothers.
When the Disney Company was run by the Gentile Disney family prior to its takeover by Eisner in 1984, it epitomized wholesome, family entertainment. While it still holds the rights to Snow White, under Eisner, the company has expanded into the production of graphic sex and violence.

In addition, it has 225 affiliated stations in the United States and is part owner of several European TV companies.

ABC’s cable subsidiary, ESPN, is headed by president and CEO Steven Bornstein, a Jew. This corporation also has a controlling share of Lifetime Television and the Arts & Entertainment Network cable companies. ABC Radio Network owns eleven AM and ten FM stations, again in major cities such as New York, Washington, Los Angeles, and has over 3,400 affiliates.

Although primarily a telecommunications company, Capital Cities/ABC earned over $1 billion in publishing in 1994. It owns seven daily newspapers, Fairchild Publications, Chilton Publications, and the Diversified Publishing Group.

Time Warner Inc. is the second of the international media leviathans. The chairman of the board and CEO, Gerald Levin, is a Jew. Time Warner’s subsidiary HBO is the country’s largest pay-TV cable network. Warner Music is by far the world’s largest record company, with 50 labels, the biggest of which is Warner Brothers Records, headed by Danny Goldberg. Stuart Hersch is president of Warnervision, Warner Music’s video production unit. Goldberg and Hersch are Jews.

Warner Music was an early promoter of “gangsta rap.” Through its involvement with Interscope Records, it helped popularize a genre whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge blacks to commit acts of violence against whites.

In addition to cable and music, Time Warner is heavily involved in the production of feature films (Warner Brothers Studios) and publishing.

Time Warner’s publishing division (editor-in-chief Norman Pearlstine, a Jew) is the largest magazine publisher in the country (Time, Sports Illustrated, People, Fortune).

When Ted Turner, a Gentile, made a bid to buy CBS in 1985, there was panic in media boardrooms across the nation. Turner made a fortune in advertising and then had built a successful cable-TV news network, CNN. Although Turner employed a number of Jews in key executive positions in CNN and had never taken public positions contrary to Jewish interests, he is a man with a large ego and a strong personality and was regarded by Chairman William Paley (real name Palinsky, a Jew) and the other Jews at CBS as uncontrollable: a loose cannon who might at some time in the future turn against them.

Furthermore, Jewish newsman Daniel Schorr, who had worked for Turner, publicly charged that his former boss held a personal dislike for Jews. To block Turner’s bid, CBS executives invited billionaire Jewish theater, hotel, insurance, and cigarette magnate Laurence Tisch to launch a “friendly” takeover of the company, and from 1986 till 1995 Tisch was the chairman and CEO of CBS, removing any threat of non-Jewish influence there.

Subsequent efforts by Turner to acquire a major network have been obstructed by Levin’s Time Warner, which owns nearly 20 percent of CBS stock and has veto power over major deals.

Viacom Inc., headed by Sumner Redstone (born Murray Rothstein), a Jew, is the third largest megamedia corporation in the country, with revenues of over $10 billion a year. Viacom, which produces and distributes TV programs for the three largest networks, owns 12 television stations and 12 radio stations. It produces feature films through Paramount Pictures, headed by Jewess Sherry Lansing. Its publishing division includes Prentice Hall, Simon & Schuster, and Pocket Books. It distributes videos through over 4,000 Blockbuster stores.

Viacom’s chief claim to fame, however, is as the world’s largest provider of cable programming, through its Showtime, MTV, Nickelodeon, and other networks. Since 1989, MTV and Nickelodeon have acquired larger and larger shares of the younger television audience.

With the top three, and by far the largest, media companies in the hand of Jews, it is difficult to believe that such an overwhelming degree of control came about without a deliberate, concerted effort on their part. What about the other big media companies?

Number four on the list is Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, which owns Fox Television and 20th Century Fox Films. Murdoch is a Gentile [although he maintains extremely close contacts with a number of extremist Israeli politicians], but Peter Chermin, who heads Murdoch’s film studio and also oversees his TV production, is a Jew.

Number five is the Japanese Sony Corporation, whose U.S. subsidiary, Sony Corporation of America, is run by Michael Schulhof, a Jew. Alan Levine, another Jew, heads the Sony Pictures division.

Most of the television and movie production companies that are not owned by the largest corporations are also controlled by Jews. For example, New World Entertainment, proclaimed by one media analyst as “the premiere independent TV program producer in the United States,” is owned by Ronald Perelman, a Jew.

The best known of the smaller media companies, Dreamworks SKG, is a strictly kosher affair. Dream Works was formed in 1994 amid great media hype by recording industry mogul David Geffen, former Disney Pictures chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg, and film director Steven Spielberg, all three of whom are Jews. The company produces movies, animated films, television programs, and recorded music.

Two other large production companies, MCA and Universal Pictures, are both owned by Seagram Company, Ltd. The president and CEO of Seagram, the liquor giant, is Edgar Bronfman Jr., who is also president of the World Jewish Congress.

It is well known that Jews have controlled the production and distribution of films since the inception of the movie industry in the early decades of the 20th century. This is still the case today. Films produced by just the five largest motion picture companies mentioned above -- Disney, Warner Brothers, Sony, Paramount (Viacom), and Universal (Seagram) -- accounted for 74 percent of the total box-office receipts for the first eight months of 1995.

Television

The big three in television network broadcasting used to be ABC, CBS, and NBC. With the consolidation of the media empires, these three are no longer independent entities. While they were independent, however, each was controlled by a Jew since its inception: ABC by Leonard Goldenson, CBS first by William Paley and then by Lawrence Tisch, and NBC first by David Sarnoff and then by his son Robert.

Over periods of several decades, these networks were staffed from top to bottom with Jews, and the essential Jewishness of network television did not change when the networks were absorbed by other corporations. The Jewish presence in television news remains particularly strong.

As noted, ABC is part of Eisner’s Disney Company, and the executive producers of ABC’s news programs are all Jews: Victor Neufeld (20-20), Bob Reichbloom (Good Morning America), and Rick Kaplan (World News Tonight).

CBS was recently purchased by Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Nevertheless, the man appointed by Lawrence Tisch, Eric Ober, remains president of CBS News, and Ober is a Jew.

At NBC, now owned by General Electric, NBC News president Andrew Lack is a Jew, as are executive producers Jeff Zucker (Today), Jeff Gralnick (NBC Nightly News), and Neal Shapiro (Dateline).

Print Media

After television news, daily newspapers are the most influential information medium in America. Sixty million of them are sold (and presumably read) each day. These millions are divided among some 1,500 different publications.

One might conclude that the sheer number of different newspapers across America would provide a safeguard against Jewish control and distortion. However, this is not the case. There is less independence, less competition, and much less representation of our interests than a casual observer would think.

The days when most cities and even towns had several independently owned newspapers published by local people with close ties to the community are gone. Today, most “local” newspapers are owned by a rather small number of large companies controlled by executives who live and work hundreds or ever thousands of miles away.

The fact is that only about 25 per cent of the country’s 1,500 papers are independently owned; the rest belong to multi-newspaper chains. Only a handful are large enough to maintain independent reporting staffs outside their own communities; the rest depend on these few for all of their national and international news.

The Newhouse empire of Jewish brothers Samuel and Donald Newhouse provides an example of more than the lack of real competition among America’s daily newspapers: it also illustrates the insatiable appetite Jews have shown for all the organs of opinion control on which they could fasten their grip.

The Newhouses own 26 daily newspapers, including several large and important ones, such as the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Newark Star-Ledger, and the New Orleans Times-Picayune; the nation’s largest trade book publishing conglomerate, Random House, with all its subsidiaries; Newhouse Broadcasting, consisting of 12 television broadcasting stations and 87 cable-TV systems, including some of the country’s largest cable networks; the Sunday supplement Parade, with a circulation of more than 22 million copies per week; some two dozen major magazines, including the New Yorker, Vogue, Madmoiselle, Glamour, Vanity Fair, Bride’s, Gentlemen’s Quarterly, Self, House & Garden, and all the other magazines of the wholly owned Conde Nast group.

This Jewish media empire was founded by the late Samuel Newhouse, an immigrant from Russia. The gobbling up of so many newspapers by the Newhouse family was in large degree made possible by the fact that newspapers are not supported by their subscribers, but by their advertisers. It is advertising revenue --not the small change collected from a newspaper’s readers -- that largely pays the editor’s salary and yields the owner’s profit. Whenever the large advertisers in a city choose to favor one newspaper over another with their business, the favored newspaper will flourish while its competitor dies.

Since the beginning of the 20th century, when Jewish mercantile power in America became a dominant economic force, there has been a steady rise in the number of American newspapers in Jewish hands, accompanied by a steady decline in the number of competing Gentile newspapers -- primarily as a result of selective advertising policies by Jewish merchants.

Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership and management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising revenue that their editorial and news reporting policies are largely constrained by Jewish likes and dislikes. It holds true in the newspaper business as elsewhere that he who pays the piper calls the tune.

Three Jewish Newspapers

The suppression of competition and the establishment of local monopolies on the dissemination of news and opinion have characterized the rise of Jewish control over America’s newspapers. The resulting ability of the Jews to use the press as an unopposed instrument of Jewish policy could hardly be better illustrated than by the examples of the nation’s three most prestigious and influential newspapers: the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post.

These three, dominating America’s financial and political capitals, are the newspapers which set the trends and the guidelines for nearly all the others. They are the ones which decide what is news and what isn’t, at the national and international levels. They originate the news; the others merely copy it, and all three newspapers are in Jewish hands.

The New York Times was founded in 1851 by two Gentiles, Henry Raymond and George Jones. After their deaths, it was purchased in 1896 from Jones’s estate by a wealthy Jewish publisher, Adolph Ochs. His great-grandson, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr., is the paper’s current publisher and CEO. The executive editor is Max Frankel, and the managing editor is Joseph Lelyveld. Both of the latter are also Jews.

The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York Times Co., 33 other newspapers, including the Boston Globe; twelve magazines, including McCall’s and Family Circle with circulations of more than 5 million each; seven radio and TV broadcasting stations; a cable-TV system; and three book publishing companies. The New York Times News Service transmits news stories, features, and photographs from the New York Times by wire to 506 other newspapers, news agencies, and magazines.

Of similar national importance is the Washington Post, which, by establishing its “leaks” throughout government agencies in Washington, has an inside track on news involving the Federal government.

The Washington Post, like the New York Times, had a non-Jewish origin. It was established in 1877 by Stilson Hutchins, purchased from him in 1905 by John McLean, and later inherited by Edward McLean. In June 1933, however, at the height of the Great Depression, the newspaper was forced into bankruptcy. It was purchased at a bankruptcy auction by Eugene Meyer, a Jewish financier.

The Washington Post is now run by Katherine Meyer Graham, Eugene Meyer’s daughter. She is the principal stockholder and the board chairman of the Washington Post Co. In 1979, she appointed her son Donald publisher of the paper. He now also holds the posts of president and CEO of the Washington Post Co.

The Washington Post Co. has a number of other media holdings in newspapers, television, and magazines, most notably the nation’s number-two weekly newsmagazine, Newsweek.

The Wall Street Journal, which sells 1.8 million copies each weekday, is the nation’s largest-circulation daily newspaper. It is owned by Dow Jones & Company Inc., a New York corporation which also publishes 24 other daily newspapers and the weekly financial tabloid Barron’s, among other things. The chairman and CEO of Dow Jones is Peter Kann, who is a Jew. Kann also holds the posts of chairman and publisher of the Wall Street Journal.

Most of New York’s other major newspapers are in no better hands than the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. The New York Daily News is owned by Jewish real-estate developer Mortimer B. Zuckerman. The Village Voice is the personal property of Leonard Stern, the billionaire Jewish owner of the Hartz Mountain pet supply firm.

Other Mass Media

The story is pretty much the same for other media as it is for television, radio, and newspapers. Consider, for example, newsmagazines. There are only three of any note published in the United States: Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News and World Report.

Time, with a weekly circulation of 4.1 million, is published by a subsidiary of Time Warner Communications. The CEO of Time Warner Communications, as mentioned above, is Gerald Levin, a Jew.

Newsweek, as mentioned above, is published by the Washington Post Company, under the Jewess Katherine Meyer Graham. Its weekly circulation is 3.2 million.

U.S. News & World Report, with a weekly circulation of 2.3 million, is owned and published by Mortimer Zuckerman, a Jew. Zuckerman also owns the Atlantic Monthly and New York’s tabloid newspaper, the Daily News, which is the sixth-largest paper in the country.

Among the giant book-publishing conglomerates, the situation is also Jewish. Three of the six largest book publishers in the U.S., according to Publisher’s Weekly, are owned or controlled by Jews.

The three are first-place Random House (with its many subsidiaries, including Crown Publishing Group), third-place Simon & Schuster, and sixth-place Time Warner Trade Group (including Warner Books and Little, Brown).

Another publisher of special significance is Western Publishing. Although it ranks only 13th in size among all U.S. publishers, it ranks first among publishers of children’s books, with more than 50 percent of the market. Its chairman and CEO is Richard Snyder, a Jew, who just replaced Richard Bernstein, also a Jew.

The Effect of Jewish Control of the Media

These are the facts of Jewish media control in America. Anyone willing to spend several hours in a large library can verify their accuracy. I hope that these facts are disturbing to you, to say the least.

Should any minority be allowed to wield such awesome power? Certainly not, and allowing a people with beliefs such as expressed in the Talmud to determine what we get to read or watch in effect gives this small minority the power to mold our minds to suit their own Talmudic interests -- interests which as we have demonstrated are diametrically opposed to the interests of our people.

By permitting the Jews to control our news and entertainment media, we are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence on our political system and virtual control of our government; we also are giving them control of the minds and souls of our children, whose attitudes and ideas are shaped more by Jewish television and Jewish films than by their parents, their schools, or any other influence.

reply to post by pujols5


A quick Google of your text tells me that you copied (stole?) this information from Jew Watch.

Besides the fact that directly copying and pasting information from an external source breaks the terms and conditions, you are quite clearly a Jew hater. No need to be ashamed of that, we all have our prejudices. But I'd prefer not to have to read odious crap like this on my favourite discussion site.

Of course the world will rise against Israel. That was foretold in the Bible.

Russia will join in, but will be reluctant to do so. She will be drug down with hooks in her mouth.

It is all coming together.

www.jewsnotzionists.org...

It is what it is, now isnt it? Seems the hypocricy just feeds upon itself. Sooner or later if you predict enough.....everything comes true.

reply to post by HappilyEverAfter

There are in fact many Jewish movements, groups and organizations whose ideology regarding Zionism and the so-called "State of Israel" is that of the unadulterated Torah position that any form of Zionism is heresy and that the existence of the so-called "State of Israel" is illegitimate.

No one has had to create any antagonism between our Torah and Zionism because such antagonism exists by virtue of the essence of Judaism itself, which can never tolerate the heresy of Zionism.

Zionism is wrong from the Torah viewpoint, not because many of its adherents are lax in practice or even anti-religious, but because its fundamental principle conflicts with the Torah.

Unfortunately, due to many undesirable factors, the view of Torah-true Jewry has been concealed from the general public

JewsnotZionist.org

That mission statement deserves being seen and read, and the truth that their are a large number of Jews who do not agree with or condone Zionist Iraeal politics.

There is a real difference between being anti-Zionist and anti-Jewish and the Zionists very much don't want people to make that distinction and try very hard not to allow them too.

Zionism hides behind Jews and has worked meticulously to try to create a race, culture and religion of people it purports should be beyond reproach.

The plain truth is that while homicidal maniacs like Hitler were exterminating Jews and Slavs and Gypsies, Homo Sexuals and Political Dissidents in the millons...

Across the ocean here in America men like Myer Lansky and Benjamin Bugsy Seigel were murdering innocent people themselves as Jewish Gangsters who affectionately called themselves Murder Inc.

Jews are just people like the rest of us, Zionists are just people like the rest of us, Iranians are just people like the rest of us.

Trying to cast an entire group of people as saints or sinners is patently wrong, and ignorant.

Imagining any one group of human beings is above reproach is ludicrous.

That the Zionists try so hard to effect that image to murderous ends?

Well...

Originally posted by HappilyEverAfter
www.jewsnotzionists.org...

It is what it is, now isnt it? Seems the hypocricy just feeds upon itself. Sooner or later if you predict enough.....everything comes true.

Seems to be a lot of fluff and no cream filling.

Either way, prophecy is being fulfilled by what is going on in the world today.

To deny that is just ignorant.