It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You just made a thread about probiblity but yet you do not understand logic in its basic form?
SUPPER MASSIVE < human > SUPPER SMALL
what connects both? Its looking right at you????????
The point is YOU are the APEX of scale in our own reality YOU become the missing link in all mathmatics.
You MY friend ARE bosson!
Be happy knowing you make the universe work in a fundermental way and without you, it would not work.
human conscious observation. The observer effect explicitly states that the "observer" can be as simple as an electron.
The observer effect explicitly states that the "observer" can be as simple as an electron.
Yet you controdict your own statment?
How big are you?
did you not see that great vid?
what is mass? well mass is the observation of atoms packed together it becomes a brick..
Now what or why it becomes a brick you may GASP? well we are OBSERVING IT "like the little tiny electron you are" in "scale" ?
and in this case I DO. and if you take that as offensive then thats the outcome you wish to make happpen and was always going to happen just by the very fact you are here..
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
I'm not usually a spelling nazi but you could at least spell the 5 words in the title correctly, it's particle. When i saw that misspelling I thought it would be a nonsense post but actually it's an interesting OP.
The quantum scale versus the larger scales does make a huge difference, and the physics are different as you point out.
But on the scale of a man or a star, the physics are pretty much the same.
BTW here's a good star size comparison video, my favorite:
Actually it seems like your post is about scale, so of course I have to post my favorite scale video, power of 10:
Gulliver's travels anyone? Are we tiny insignificant specks, or giants? Both I guess depending on the scale we compare ourselves to.
Originally posted by tgidkp
the OP is correct in his conclusion
You MY friend ARE bosson!
however, i can see why sirnex is in disagreement because the OP has not laid out the argument very well. good work, OP.
Isn’t it interesting that we (the human race) have experienced many natural disasters that are big enough to effect human life greatly but not enough to wipe out the human race on Earth? (yet)
Is it just a coincidence that the external environment interacts with us as at the perfect size and rate?
Well, I guess we can stop looking for the cause of mass. We stupidly spent billions of dollars on failed experiments, but thanks to the wonders of logical fallacy, you figured it out without spending a dime!
Please show the mechanism where information gaps the five sensory organs and said information is directly observed by the conscious mind. Hell, explain consciousness for that matter.
I agree, the common denominator is the observer within all life.
Evolution as simply allowed for our "minds" to create a more expressive physical vehicle.
The observer/responder is the driving force of evolution.