It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Copenhagen Climate Treaty! Do you know the facts?

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 15 2009 @ 04:24 AM
link   
I came across a copy of the "treaty" that the leaders of our world are debating at the moment. It is a very interesting read. It appears that we are to reduce our CO2 levels to 95% of 1990 levels in periodic increments. It also appears that a lot of the money that is going to be raised from the taxes, fines, or levies are going to be given to third world countries as a "pity payment" for our advanced countries damaging and "polluting" their resources. I think that every member should at least read page 16 if nothing else.
I think that it's just another step closer to uniting all governments and taking away our rights. Carbon dioxide is NOT a pollutant. It is what plants crave. It even points out that this, if implemented would reduce average world temperature by 2 degrees celsius.

UN Climate Change Treaty




posted on Dec, 15 2009 @ 04:42 AM
link   
Lord Mockton Has a very intriguing view on the treaty. He was a Maggie Thatcher adviser. He's an environmental policy wonk of the highest order, and a master of converting knowledge to action. He sued to prevent Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" from being forced into British classrooms... and won. The judge ordered that 9 serious inaccuracies in the film be corrected. Lord Mockton travels the globe to educate people on the myth of global warming.
Info obtained from freedomworks.

Here is an interesting video:



posted on Dec, 15 2009 @ 04:49 AM
link   
Please use the search function, I covered this in great detail in the role as FSME.

I read and basically summarised the draft treaty

December, 2009, the treathy that will bring...



posted on Dec, 15 2009 @ 07:00 AM
link   
reply to post by infinite
 


I did search. Maybe I should have used the word treathy instead.



posted on Dec, 15 2009 @ 07:07 AM
link   
I just read your post. When I typed in Copenhagen treaty, I didn't see anthing that resembled this. I apologize. On the other hand, I don't belIeve you covered anything in depth, therefore I will keep this up and ask the mods to make the decision.



posted on Dec, 15 2009 @ 07:30 AM
link   
reply to post by NEWclearMind
 


Well, there is a dozen threads on this topic (even a few before I posted the treaty and covered it). My advice is to literally read the rest and try to spin this off in a different direction.

You will be competing with the threads in the news sections and other parts of the board - some are turning into rather large (and heated) discussion.

Btw, I was not being rude - I've pointed this out to other members in the past and present. The New World Order section is difficult to organising because numerous topics tend to be repeated.



[edit on 15-12-2009 by infinite]



posted on Dec, 15 2009 @ 07:37 AM
link   
I understand. I really didn't see this anywhere else. I figured it would have made front page. Nonetheless, good work. Intelligent minds think alike. Happy hollidays.

[edit on 15-12-2009 by NEWclearMind]



posted on Dec, 15 2009 @ 07:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by NEWclearMind
I really didn't see this anywhere else.


Climategate, Copenhagen and the New World Order

factbeforefiction covered the subject very well, it is rather popular in the NWO section at the moment. Numerous links, including to other ATS threads, and videos as well.



new topics

top topics



 
1

log in

join