Australia considering Nukes...., page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 15-12-2009 @ 02:55 AM by TaraLou
reply to post by GhostR1der



NZ is definitely nuclear free - and I hope that Australia does not get nukes.

Why get nukes, Aus? You would get nuked first anyway, so there is no point.

Remain nuclear free, and make our corner of the world nuclear free.

Nukes are evil - let's try and save the world instead of wrecking it even more than we have already.


reply posted on 15-12-2009 @ 02:58 AM by Tayesin

Quoted by Tara Lou Why get nukes, Aus? You would get nuked first anyway, so there is no point.


Too late, Australia has been a First Strike target of Russia since the early 70's because of the U.S. bases here on our soil. Facts from "Can Australia survive WWIII" from the late 70's or early '80's.

More importantly.......

To share this story I am going against not only the standard official secrets act that all members of the armed forces in Oz have to sign before leaving the services, but also the 2nd and more important one that covers what I saw on bivouac at Woodside ( I think it was called) army base during our basic training for the air force in 1978.

I was 18 and leading a small night march of 6 recruits using a compass and designated points to be "destroyed" on the base while their security forces were doing their rounds, knowing that we were in the area. If caught we were to be detained as prisoners of war. So the training was conducted much like a mini war game.

For some reason I never understood, the last leg of our march should have taken us back to where we were camped for the night, but it didn't. Instead we found ourselves creeping around earthworks with large concrete pads that had massive holes in the top. I was the only one who wanted to look inside the holes, and what I saw was nothing short of a missile silo. It was over 100 feet deep, there were walkways at various levels, etc.

I panicked, thinking I knew what I was looking at, so when we finally did make it back to camp I informed my Sargeant immediately about what I saw. He led me well away from the camp before telling me he will report this and that I am not to say a thing to anyone else until I am questioned about it.

It wasn't long after we arrived back at Edinbirgh AFB that I was picked up by the Provo (sp) Martial and questioned, so I made a point of playing dumb and not understanding what I saw that night. Which went in my favour, but I was going to be discharged anyway.

Two nights later I went for my meditation lessons with a Zen master who also worked at the Weapons Research Establishment as a physicist. I told him what I saw and he said, "I can't tell you a thing. But I will say, do not believe we are not capable already." End of discussion.

So when I was discharged I had to sign the 2nd secretive act, and it is something no other military person I've spoken with, except one, who thinks it possible that there was a 2nd secret act hardcopy to sign!! And that other person who knew about the 2nd form was a 20 year veteran of our own elite forces who I interviewed in the 1990's.

What I am saying is this; we already have some nuclear capability now, and for the past 30 years or so. Maybe this is more about acceptance by the public of something being put forward as necessary now given our new role as the Pacific Police in unison with U.S. support.






[edit on 15-12-2009 by Tayesin]

[edit on 15-12-2009 by Tayesin]


reply posted on 15-12-2009 @ 05:06 AM by Nomad451
reply to post by MOTT the HOOPLE



Hahahaha man, I had to laugh out loud on that one! Thats hilarious


reply posted on 15-12-2009 @ 05:14 AM by TaraLou
reply to post by MOTT the HOOPLE



To Mott and Nomad,

May you get nukes right up there where you wished the kangas got them.

I would be ashamed to be Oz, judging by you.


reply posted on 15-12-2009 @ 05:50 AM by andy1033
reply to post by The_Seeker



Do not even start with the rubbish that aussie land is nuke free.

Waste of time news.



reply posted on 15-12-2009 @ 05:56 AM by TaraLou
reply to post by andy1033



OK, that leaves clean green NZ.

How soon before someone nukes us to teach us a lesson?

WARNING: Nuke NZ = end of the world.


reply posted on 15-12-2009 @ 06:19 AM by Chadwickus
reply to post by Melbourne_Militia



Look I'm sure Israel do have secret nukes, maybe even India and USA.

BUT. Those countries are already known to have nukes, Australia is known to NOT have nukes.

Like I said, the second mot important reason for having and letting everyone else that you have nukes is for bluffing purposes.

[edit on 15/12/09 by Chadwickus]


reply posted on 15-12-2009 @ 06:48 AM by Melbourne_Militia
In regards to the comment that Australia doesnt have rocket technology we assisted the developement of a medium range ballistic missile back in the 50's which was designed to carry a nuclear warhead.

en.wikipedia.org...

During the 1950s, Australia participated in the development of the Blue Streak missile, a Medium-range ballistic missile (MRBM) intended for delivery of a nuclear warhead.


The following info i find interesting -

During the 1970s and 1980s, ANSTO scientists developed centrifuge enrichment technology, claimed to be comparable with the commercial URENCO centrifuge technology of the time. Such technology, if deployed on an industrial scale, would have been capable in principle of producing highly enriched uranium for nuclear weapons. The research lost government funding in the mid-1980s.


and


An Australian company has been actively developing a novel process for uranium enrichment, Separation of Isotopes by Laser Excitation (SILEX).


Even thou we dont publicly make or support nuclear weapons can anyone positively tell me that we dont have a nuclear weapons program run by private corporations.....with the government funding and supporting it from a distance so as not to be tarnished with the same brush?

In regards to Argetina making our reactor...well, yes, the new one thats replacing the old one at Luxas Heights is Argentinian and is the same one that the private firm Silex is "researching" new methods of cost effective and quick enrichment of Uranium.

www.globalcollab.org...

The earlier secret enrichment research of the AAEC was terminated, but it was later substituted by an equally secret project conducted by a private company called 'Silex' using leased premises at Lucas Heights to enrich uranium by lasers. And a new light water research reactor of 20 MW power designed by the Argentine firm INVAP has almost been completed to replace the aging HIFAR reactor.

Officials from ANSTO and the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade avoid any suggestion that the INVAP reactor has anything to do with weapons technology. They claim that as an up-to-date research vehicle, it will give Australian diplomats more credibility to pursue Australia's nuclear interests (and non-proliferation credentials) in international forums. Also, that it will improve public health in Australia by producing a guaranteed supply of nuclear diagnostic and radiation treatment generators for use in hospitals, and allow sophisticated research in many areas of nuclear science.


Sounds like a good cover story to me....we are using this reactor for "research" and "medicine"........

Ill try and get more info when I have more time......
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Nano Drones Flying in Formation
  Posted 8 days ago with 15 member flags
FPS RUSSIA
  Posted 13 days ago with 7 member flags
Spinel Thin Transparent Ceramic Armor defeats Barrett .50 Cal BMG
  Posted 12 days ago with 6 member flags
Self-steering Bullet Researched
  Posted 9 days ago with 5 member flags
Shockrounds take out three of your five senses.
  Posted 2 days ago with 5 member flags
Defective Ammunition Warning
  Posted 1 days ago with 5 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Santorum wants more fracking!!!
  US Political Madness, Posted 13 hours ago, 53 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 9 hours ago, 52 replies