It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by piddles
I really hate how defensive the GWing side has become.
Honestly, they should just change their title to Global Climate Destabilization (is GCD really so hard?) to make themselves more relevant.
oh, and whoever said "This jackass almost became our president" or whatever:
You liked W Bush and his dishonest way of winning an election? LOLOLOLOLZZZZZZZZZ
From my perspective: There's a chance that Gore may be sensationalizing this data but on the other hand, they recently had a great deal of trouble with those e-mails being taken out of context. I want to think that they wouldn't do something as stupid as outwardly lie after a fiasco that has people who know nothing about the weather saying "case closed".
goddamn glenn beck
Originally posted by kenochs
reply to post by rnaa
A bunch of sorry self-important baby Nero's who fiddle while they sell their grandhildren's planet down the river.
It's unfathomable to me that a movement that is a natural outgrowth of the environmental movement could get so much heat here.
Is moving to alternative energies a bad thing? No.
Is cutting down on consumption and moving away from petrochemical based packaging a bad thing? No. Are energy efficient lights, homes, etc. etc. a bad goal. No. All of these things are worthy goals? Of course.
But suddenly because these ideas also fall under the category of fighting global warming they become suspect.
What really concerns me is how these corporate run anti-GW shills can effectively get people to work against their own interests.
Talk about sheeple.