Originally posted by Aeons
You know, I don't believe even a little bit about all the alien/reptiles etc. stuff.
Your position is not only respectable but entirely logical. Without overwhelming evidence of such things nothing should make us believe in them. I
actually have a hard time understanding how sometimes people can believe in things which although I witnessed first hand
I still have a hard
time accepting them, when they themselves may not have direct evidence of this being factual. They may however know enough about what lies around a
possible fact that it becomes self evident even without first hand experience.
The reason your disbelief is logical is not just because one may tend to believe "on faith", something which doesn't comply with positivist
empiricism, but more importantly is the intellectual requirement that we MUST keep a very strong measure of skepticism given that there is so much
conflicting information and misleading interpretation out there. When you hear countless different versions of reality in cacophonist symphony, what
is needed to thrash out the truth? We need strong subjective references of what we intimately KNOW to be true. Upon that basis only can we establish
further potential interpretations of phenomena and events to gradually eliminate falsehood leaving only truth remaining.
So, unless you have what you deem to be SOLID evidence of this, believing in Aliens - and more-so yet in the presence here of Reptile Humanoids -
would be downright silly. In my case, I received quite involuntarily such evidence, which passes my own test of evidence as I had occasion to verify
this in person. I have hence been forced to make room for this factor within the deductive framework of analysis. You will readily agree that such a
parameter does not make for an easy interpretation of events, especially as exposed by mainstream news and establishment media.
Originally posted by Aeons
However, I think you are onto something. Some of the people you are pointing out as clones and are discussing their ears.
Ears are a genetic trait. They don't change over time.
One person's ears changing over the course of time is suspicious.
Are they clones? No. Clones would have the same earlobes.
As Someotherguy has mentioned, ears are used for identification purposes and are usually the focus of choice for intelligence agencies trying to
identify body doubles of politicians during public manifestations or official State travel. What is genetically determined is the "inner ear"
structure, while the surrounding soft cartilage can reportedly change depending upon early amniotic fluid composition, gestation stress and early
birthing and infant rearing environments. Height can also change depending on stress and nutrition, as has been verified in control situations where
identical twins have been raised in highly divergent conditions reaching significantly different adult body heights.
What does not change is skull shape - unless during pregnancy or birthing the head is compressed and deformed while still soft - nor does the bone
structure of the face and jawline. This facial geometry is therefore the primary key to ascertaining the identity of an individual. For example, in
identifying whether James Paul McCartney was replaced by an impostor, incorrect head shape yields the initial evidence that it cannot be the same man.
Next we can find differences in the jawline and mouth size, eye slant angles, etc. Further details can be found simply by clicking on my signature
link to a blog which has quite comprehensive details about forensic evidence of this replacement.
Regarding Clones having the same Ear Lobes, we can assume that while this might be accurate, nothing would prevent surgical modification of this
feature at birth among certain select clones as a "signature" encoding, enabling those in the know to differentiate between several identical
reproductions of an otherwise identical individual. Of course, when later using one such clone to replace a given person in a high profile public
position, one would need to surgically "adjust" this minor tell-tale feature so that his/her physique would become fully compatible for a
In the other thread about potentially cloned political leaders (see links in above posts) a pattern was noted whereby there were different lobes
discovered as systematically similar for subjects found in the former Soviet Union, those (presumably originals?) in Europe, and those in the United
States. If true, which is as of yet unproven, this could imply that some other power, some form of global secret government already in place during
the Cold War, might have operated such a program with the complicity of secret societies and/or intelligence agencies worldwide. But what possible
motives could humans have had to operate something so strange and obtuse? Might such a power, with such an odd and dubious program, have been
necessarily human in origin? Thus the Alien postulate needing to be verified.
Originally posted by Aeons
But they could be look a like replacements. People who pass muster by having face geometry which is acceptable to people - particularly if you give
them something to attribute changes to. Plastic surgery, a stint a hard core drug user. Something.
A few days ago I came across an issue of People Magazine in which Brad Pitt was shown sporting a long beard which hid his features to a great extent.
This is a technique often used to conceal noticeable differences, and to somehow erase the cognitive memories of a former set of feature identifiers
in people's minds by "smudging" them with images of a strangely bearded persona. Then you can, after a sufficient time of wearing a beard mask,
remove the beard, and any changes in features will be attributed by the media and even by the public themselves to the change from bearded to shaved,
rather than to discrepancies between the earlier original shaved and later impostor shaved physiognomies.
Brad Pitt (?) in disguise phase
It has been suspected that he was replaced several years ago, as can be noted in this thread where it is also noted with photographic confirmation
that "Brad Pitt was thrown out by a security guard at the premiere of his new movie ("The Curious Case of Benjamin Button"). The guard apparently
didn't recognize him - thought he was paparazzo".
Brad Pitt - a Celebrity Doppelganger?
It should be noted that many such 'bouncers' just like specially trained security staff in Casinos are professional physiognomists. As trained in
visual identification of physical traits and facial features, we can consider such professional assessment to be at least as good as our own. That a
night club bouncer is also a physiognomist can be ascertained at random over the internet where an instant search gave the following Bounce Curriculum
Vitae which states as experience: "Bouncer & Physiognomist - Night Surveillance and control of public areas"
Close Protection Officer Job wanted
It is interesting to note that a similar ploy was used for ALL FOUR BEATLES when the appeared on the Sgt Pepper album cover, fully disguised in beards
and fantasy military full dress costume. It has been assessed by a number of researchers that this was done to conceal at least one, if not several,
replacements of members of the band.
We will note that numerous celebrities have been replaced - whether by surgically modified impostors or by cloned doubles remains to be ascertained on
a case by case basis - usually after a removal from public view for several months prior to reappearing as having been through psychological hell,
severe physical trauma, psychological transformational therapy or any number of other cover stories to justify that they seem to have changed
significantly enough that people cannot fail to notice. This way the explanation for such noted changes is given preemptively. Drug, alcohol and
sex addiction and rehab being those used most recently, possibly to derive an additional value of role model suggestions to legitimize such moral
decadence among their fans, thus undermining balanced traditional family values in society.
The more you research celebrity replacements, the more aware you become of the sheer size and extensiveness of this "program", the less explainable
it becomes using typical motives such as global dominance, economic control of resources, political influence or building any form of a social ideal
or ideology. What remains is something distinctly inhuman in character, which aims at destroying the very essence of humanity similarly to a war
waged against our souls. This leaves us with only 2 competing hypotheses, the older and more traditional one of the battle of Good versus Evil and
the Devil and his minions aiming to rob us of our souls, and the more recent eclectic theory that some form of Alien or extraterrestrial beings are
infiltrating Earth's power structures and using the influence of celebrity role models to achieve their own Agenda, one which we cannot yet
For What It's Worth...