Actually, I told this Sunday to a full table with people who have known me well for ages, who know my neighborhood, where I live, where my car was
parked, the street I was walking down, where I witnessed the humungous Reptoid, and I told them over lunch that I had witnessed this one night back in
2007. It is harder to do when you are faced with the direct reaction of people who know you well, who trust you and respect your mind and judgment,
and tell them such a story. They didn't know how to react, and I can well understand why. Some tried to change topic, to spare me ridicule. So it
isn't exactly easy to have such an experience and relay it to others.
The one I saw was clad, hooded, wings folded under jacket and had darker scales
I don't expect anyone to believe me, and as I said already in several threads here at ATS, I did question my own sanity because it was NOT POSSIBLE
that such a creature could exist, much less walk down a city street. Yet it did happen, and I was there as a direct eyewitness as well as witnessing
it simultaneously by my sixth sense which was definitely set into alert mode. It took me two years to get the gumption to even write about it
anonymously here at ATS. It was that jarring an experience as it called into question first my sanity, second my notion of our reality, and third the
degree of complicity this entails on behalf of those entrusted with our safety in government, the police and the military. Finally it exploded any
simplistic ideas I had whereby humanity was alone and that our historic and current difficulties were only related to human matters, meaning that all
earthly politics must invariably have to some degree an exopolitical component.
Regarding whether Charlemagne (which means the Magnum Charles or Charles the Great or Tall Charles) I have an inkling, but this time without any
visual confirmation of his genealogy or physiognomy, that he did get Cloned into none other than Charles De Gaulle, also known as the "Le Grand
Charles" though affectionately referred to as "Mon General". He happened to be the President who struck a deal unifying France with Germany with
German Chancellor Adenauer. Just like Charlemagne was the King who united Germany and France.
I had occasion to meet a man who deals in antiquities and historical memorabilia and to ask him about items showing Charlemagne, and he told me in
confidence (I don't know why it would have to be confidential, but that was how he told me), that the public imagery of Charlemagne wearing a beard
was not accurate at all, and that his image had been purposely concealed. But he wouldn't tell me more about what he looked like. His shop happens to
be near the Elysees Palace where Charles De Gaulle was President, and many of his clients are members of the French Government. Maybe that's why he
wouldn't say any more? The truth would be too shocking due to its implications, especially as he was revered and even venerated by the French almost
like a demi-God.
Regarding the Clone Conspiracy in general, I cannot say what is going on. Sure, just like anyone else I'd rather consider that they are simply people
who happen to carry certain genetic characteristics which will randomly express themselves from one generation to the next. But I find it uncanny that
certain people happen to seem identical to a progenitor, and find themselves somehow magically propelled to become our rulers or celebrities.
Statistically none of this can make sense, you could say that such an explanation defies logic as well as any known laws of science, the recurrence
being so frequent as to defy any possible cause other than willful cloning by some group or groups.
This is the reason that the investigation by amateur sleuthing brought us to consider various alternative theories hopefully offering possible reasons
for why Clones would be made and raised to high positions in our human society to the point where it appears that we are being RULED BY CLONES. This
leads to the questions:
WHO MADE THEM?
WHO IS PULLING THEIR STRINGS?
Regarding the investigative methods, the first one used here has been the verification of physiological traits and the visual appearance of people who
lived often centuries ago and our contemporary politicians and celebrities. This has revealed an unusual and statistically impossible correlation
between former members of royal lineages and contemporary plebeian politicians and stars. That they were cloned from their DNA is at least
statistically the most compelling theory, given that cloning is a simple technical procedure which is today used to clone the meat we are sold in
supermarkets in an industrial process, human cloning being far easier to perform if desired. Notions that this could not have been done before today's
times is contradicted by the direct evidence of the presence of so many clones in these fields of endeavor.
Other investigative measures could include both donor and clone DNA sampling and whistleblower testimony. It is also going to be hard to ensure the
authenticity of the source DNA samples, that no tampering with this DNA is done at any stage of its conveyance and handling, and that the Lab will
remain honest and accurate despite the likely pressures to silence them. However I must suggest that we not pursue the path recommended above by the
Captain, and that we must stop short of brutally interrogating or otherwise subjecting suspected Clones to any form of harsh treatment. While they
might be a security threat, they are also possibly victims: those we have an axe to grind with are the ones creating them, programming them and
controlling them. In the effort to investigate and understand the situation, any help is welcome.
edit on 21-5-2012 by Getsmart because: somebody is Cloning people, for some goddamn strange purpose !