It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
In the thread "Did the USAF Help pull off 911?" he contends that the conspirators bought fake planes and flew them remotely into the buildings.
He is, I think, uncertain as to what happened to the real planes.
Originally posted by SphinxMontreal
Can you also add to the list 19 guys who couldn't fly a Cessna and some cavemen commanding them telepathically?
Originally posted by Donny 4 million
The revelations are important evidence for a reportedly ongoing secret 9/11 probe because widely available Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) photographs taken during the attacks clearly show that the few aircraft parts found at the Pentagon belonged to a small jet very similar to a modified A-3 Sky Warrior--not the American Airlines Boeing 757.
Originally posted by Doomsday 2029
This is going to sound crazy... but I believe it to be true.
I think there were over 10,000 people on the planet (possibly much more) that knew the attacks were going to happen.
Another belief that might sound crazy.... I think these attacks were planned years upon years before they happened, even to the point that this was the reason the Towers were built in the first place.
And that is what we are dealing with In my opinion... We have a large secret society that you can compare to Jonestown operating within the system of this world... Many of these people honestly believe that the work they are carrying out is "righteous".
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by Donny 4 million
The revelations are important evidence for a reportedly ongoing secret 9/11 probe because widely available Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) photographs taken during the attacks clearly show that the few aircraft parts found at the Pentagon belonged to a small jet very similar to a modified A-3 Sky Warrior--not the American Airlines Boeing 757.
Negative. The A3 Sky Warrior was powered by Pratt & Whitney engines. The parts found at the crash site had been identified as being from Rolls Royce engines, the same engines that are fitted to Boeing 757s, and are too large for the A3.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by Donny 4 million
The revelations are important evidence for a reportedly ongoing secret 9/11 probe because widely available Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) photographs taken during the attacks clearly show that the few aircraft parts found at the Pentagon belonged to a small jet very similar to a modified A-3 Sky Warrior--not the American Airlines Boeing 757.
Negative. The A3 Sky Warrior was powered by Pratt & Whitney engines. The parts found at the crash site had been identified as being from Rolls Royce engines, the same engines that are fitted to Boeing 757s, and are too large for the A3.
Originally posted by downisreallyup
Negative. The few parts, very few parts found at the Pentagon were way too small for 757 engines, and they also had the wrong hole configuration. Suggest you stop believing the official story and look at many places on the net that clearly show the pictures of the wreckage, and detailed comparisons between the parts found and the ones used in 757s.
Originally posted by Donny 4 million
Anything is possible with today's technology and un- accountability.
Including the salting of aircraft parts at crash sites.
Originally posted by Donny 4 million
All those Saudies and not one Iraqi so the US attacks Iraq. Hummm good one davey!
Originally posted by downisreallyup
look at many places on the net that clearly show the pictures of the wreckage, and detailed comparisons between the parts found and the ones used in 757s.
Originally posted by JJay55
Can't possibly be that the US government was blindsided by a more intelligent enemy and they pulled off 911, huh?
Couldn't be that there are people out there that want to kill non-muslims because of their laws, huh?
Couldn't possibly be that someone has the technology to pull off a simple operation of flying planes into buildings, because apparently that's so freeking difficult to do and no one could have possibly thought that up.
Sheesh.
Americans are dumb, that's what happened on 911.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Negative. The A3 Sky Warrior was powered by Pratt & Whitney engines. The parts found at the crash site had been identified as being from Rolls Royce engines, the same engines that are fitted to Boeing 757s, and are too large for the A3.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
...which throws the claim this is all some sort of false flag operation into the garbage right there. If it were, they'd have framed Saddam Hussein and Iraq for the attack, rather than waste their time with Al Qaida or Afghanistan.
APUs fitted to ETOPS (Extended-range Twin-engine Operations) aircraft are a critical safety device, as they supply backup electricity and compressed air in place of the dead engine or failed main engine generator. While some APUs may not be startable while the aircraft is in flight, ETOPS-compliant APUs must be flight-startable at the altitudes up to the aircraft service ceiling. Recent applications have specified starting up to 43,000 ft. (≈ 13 000 m) from a complete cold-soak condition. If the APU or its electrical generator is not available, the airplane cannot be released for ETOPS flight and is forced to take a longer non-ETOPS route.
Originally posted by Lillydale
Is it just me or are you responding to an article about how a plane was modified by claiming that it could not have been that plane because they found a rolls-royce engine? No 757 parts. No AA77 identified parts. Aaaaand the story was about the plane being modified. Could part of that modification have possible been different engines?