TEQUILAsunrise - AKA Norway Spiral - Proof it was a scientific experiment. , page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 182 times


reply posted on 14-12-2009 @ 11:54 AM by Point of No Return
reply to post by Aliensun





I'm quite sure as much as anyone, he would like the solution to this amazing puzzle.


Wrong, he already claims the solution. He's been claiming it was a rocket all week.

He dismisses this whole thread rightaway because the Heater wasn't marked for that day.

Most people can see there is more to it, at least worth more investigation.

Basically he just says, "nothing to see here".

It's become so blatant.


reply posted on 14-12-2009 @ 11:57 AM by JayinAR
reply to post by polychronopolis



Ummm... the OP illustrated how they will use rockets in conjuction with these events to study the atmospheric disturbances.

There is room for everyone involved to be happy here. Instead of making it a tit-for-tat affair, maybe we should be digging into the info a little better?


reply posted on 14-12-2009 @ 11:59 AM by hellfrozeover
reply to post by JayinAR



I am sorry if I offended him or you in anyway....I was just pointing out the facts. He is a very intelligent man, of which I gave him the title of "all mighty". When he comments on threads, others follow....usually without the intellect or decorum Phage expresses.
All in all, just having some fun and learning new and exciting things.....

Peace


reply posted on 14-12-2009 @ 12:09 PM by JayinAR
reply to post by hellfrozeover



You certainly didn't offend me...

I was just asking a question.


reply posted on 14-12-2009 @ 12:14 PM by Deny Arrogance
reply to post by OldDragger



Plausible deniability?

TBTB are clever and think several steps ahead. Maybe this and the loose russian launch alert schedule would serve as perfect cover for an experiment that could only be performed out in the open.

Not unlike scheduling a military training exercise during 9/11.

[edit on 14-12-2009 by Deny Arrogance]


reply posted on 14-12-2009 @ 12:15 PM by Quickfix
reply to post by Animal



Yeah, i am glad he brings up the thread also, but i find it lacking facts. It may have facts about another HAARP machine, but once again its speculation.

I like that he brought the thread up cause it makes people think and for one i am not convinced it is another HAARP Machine.

So it made a nice design in the atmosphere, okay, so where are the weather effects? What eartquake or storm or something happened, there was none, only the visual effect.

I can't help but feel we are missing some important facts..


[edit on 14-12-2009 by Quickfix]


reply posted on 14-12-2009 @ 12:18 PM by hellfrozeover
reply to post by OldDragger



First, it was not HAARP, it was EISCAT. HAARP is in Alaska and EISCAT is in Norway.
Second, it was not publicly announced, the OP info was taken from their website, as a scheduled test named TequilaSunrise. It outlined the experiment and it explained the process. The kind of things that scientists do when they document their work.
Third, unlike the US, Norway keeps somethings in the public domain for it's citizens to review. And we are in the land of the free, with a transparent government/president
Not saying this is proof positive, 100%.....but it sure has caught my eye and got my alert siren going off. The OP has point us in the direction to research this and help in uncovering the truth, for that S&F for him.



reply posted on 14-12-2009 @ 12:29 PM by Helmkat
reply to post by Point of No Return



Incorrect.

He says "There is something to see here, just not what you want to see."

There is a huge difference.

The OP posted his theory and Phage having done his research contributed data to the thread.

For my money it was a rocket. I know that is not popular with some on this thread but from all the data I have seen, that what I think it is. You are free to draw your own conclusions.

Some may cry its mean "debunking" to say Temples on Mars are actually basalt formations or to say a fantastic lightshow is only a failed Russian Missle but sometimes it is the truth.


reply posted on 14-12-2009 @ 12:34 PM by Deny Arrogance
reply to post by buddhasystem



The key word you used is "similar". All of the examples I have seen form imperfect, rough spirals and corkscrews that do not linger but immediately dissipate and spread. Each outer spiral gets fatter as would be expected.

I have seen nothing close to the precision and consistency displayed in Norway yet.


reply posted on 14-12-2009 @ 12:35 PM by clay2 baraka
reply to post by Helmkat



Not to mention the glaring fact that the spiral was horizontally oriented (spinning exhaust plume), whereas the graphic of the heater array shows a vertically oriented spiral emanating from the ground transmission source. .

The orientation of the spiral alone discounts a ground-based origin!


reply posted on 14-12-2009 @ 12:38 PM by hellfrozeover
reply to post by Helmkat



I hope you are not drawing your conclusions from the two lined comments of Phage posts. I read and reread this OP and it does have some very intriguing points. Now, we all can't say we are 100% sure it was this or that....but in light of this thread, it does get the ole ticker ticking.

Peace
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Starship Enterprise could be a reality by 2032, engineer says
  Posted 14 days ago with 77 member flags
TV Networks Say You\'re Breaking The Law When You Skip Commercials
  Posted 1 days ago with 36 member flags
Schoolboy \'genius\' solves puzzles posed by Sir Isaac Newton
  Posted 2 days ago with 21 member flags
I want to build a free energy generator! Suggestions?
  Posted 17 days ago with 20 member flags
World’s longest-running experiment now with webcam
  Posted 15 days ago with 19 member flags
Bye Bye Co2 and global warming
  Posted 7 days ago with 16 member flags
Big Oil Vs. Plasma Battery Technology - Guess who is winning?
  Posted 13 days ago with 14 member flags