It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

TEQUILAsunrise - AKA Norway Spiral - Proof it was a scientific experiment.

page: 26
182
<< 23  24  25    27  28  29 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 02:31 PM
link   
reply to post by buddhasystem
 


I was merely informing about some inconsistencies in his posts.

He should be able to handle himself.




posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 02:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
Something came out of the spinning rocket and produced the spiral.

[edit on 12/16/2009 by Phage]


I doubt it was fairy dust.

I mean...how many fairies would you have to dust off to collect that much dust?

I also think fairies "may" be mythical creatures of fantasy..but I have no proof.

Yet.



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 02:47 PM
link   
reply to post by danman23
 





scientific experiment.


If it was a saucer then there was no scientific experiment.
So what you are saying there was no saucer.
There must be plenty of spiral examples that are saucers or triangles
and no missile spirals.
That scientific experiment is a better drink for David Spade.
Make mine UFO style.



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 02:48 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 





What exactly was the material that was ejected? Like I said, I don't know but my guess is that it was unburned fuel. It doesn't really matter. Something came out of the spinning rocket and produced the spiral.


But there was a bright lightsource in the middle while spiraling, wich looked like a burning exhaust, something hot and bright anyway.

That wasn't due to reflection of sunlght, since the spiral itself was much less bright.

How do you explain that, it sure wasn't unburned fuel in the middle of it.

Why don't we see reflection of sunlight from the remains of the rocket when the black hole appears?

And do you think that it maybe was supposed to do this? I don't see a rocket do this because of a failure.

Thanks.



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 02:53 PM
link   
reply to post by Point of No Return
 

Rocket engines burn very brightly, particularly when seen up the kazoo.

The main reason for Russia building this new missile is an attempt to defeat our anti-missile technology. I would think that the payload, if not the entire missile, had a non-reflective coating.

Maybe it was supposed to do that. A missile failure does not mean an explosion. It means that the payload did not reach its target. We do not know the failure mode.


[edit on 12/16/2009 by Phage]



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 02:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by Point of No Return
reply to post by Phage
 





What exactly was the material that was ejected? Like I said, I don't know but my guess is that it was unburned fuel. It doesn't really matter. Something came out of the spinning rocket and produced the spiral.


But there was a bright lightsource in the middle while spiraling, wich looked like a burning exhaust, something hot and bright anyway.

That wasn't due to reflection of sunlght, since the spiral itself was much less bright.

How do you explain that, it sure wasn't unburned fuel in the middle of it.

Why don't we see reflection of sunlight from the remains of the rocket when the black hole appears?

And do you think that it maybe was supposed to do this? I don't see a rocket do this because of a failure.

Thanks.






The senter is brighter because the stuff in there has a higher density than the outer part of the spiral. And the rocket itself is just to far away to be seen with the naked eye.



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 03:01 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 





Rocket engines burn very brightly, particularly when seen up the kazoo.


Yes obviously.

So it was dumping fuel while spiraling with the exhaust still burning?



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 03:08 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 





Maybe it was supposed to do that. A missile failure does not mean an explosion. It means that the payload did not reach its target. We do not know the failure mode.


I don't think this particular missile had a payload.



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 03:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by Point of No Return
reply to post by Phage
 





Rocket engines burn very brightly, particularly when seen up the kazoo.


Yes obviously.

So it was dumping fuel while spiraling with the exhaust still burning?


Yes. Then explode.

This is what I think happened also...

The missile has probably come out of control and exploded. The peculiar spiral shaped light pattern comes from reflection of the sun in the leaking fuel


source...www.barentsobserver.com...



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 03:23 PM
link   
reply to post by kyleplatinum
 





The missile has probably come out of control and exploded. The peculiar spiral shaped light pattern comes from reflection of the sun in the leaking fuel


So if the missile came out of control, how in the hell did the leaking fuel from the out of control missile make a perfect spiral pattern for the sun to reflect of?

And where was the explosion?



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 03:29 PM
link   
reply to post by Point of No Return
 


The LEAK caused the missile to go out of control (spiraling).

and if did not explode, then the "expanding black hole effect you see is the end of the fuel.

..the reflection is so intense due to the fact that the event is in direct sunlight (very very high up)

[edit on 16-12-2009 by kyleplatinum]



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 03:33 PM
link   
reply to post by Point of No Return
 

Now you're really getting ridiculous.

I didn't say warhead. I said payload. There is no doubt that the payload of this test consisted of various instruments. There is also no doubt that that payload had an target.




[edit on 12/16/2009 by Phage]



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 03:39 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Aww, I didn't say warhead either.

So these instruments had a target? Like they were gonna drop 'em on something, like an Acme anvil?



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 03:44 PM
link   
reply to post by kyleplatinum
 


Ok, I see your point.

Still I find it hard to believe it was leaking fuel while burning the thruster and still flying in a somewhat controlled manner.



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 03:46 PM
link   
reply to post by Point of No Return
 


I don't know if the target was on the ground. It may have been, or it may have been a "window". That's what missiles are supposed to do; fly to a specific place. A failure means it did not do that. We do not know why and we probably never will so don't bother asking me about it.



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 03:52 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Can't remember were I read it but, it's said... "In theory, it has a range of 5,000 miles and could carry up to ten nuclear weapons bound for separate targets."

damn, really?



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 03:54 PM
link   
reply to post by kyleplatinum
 

Really.




posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 03:57 PM
link   
reply to post by kyleplatinum
 


If anyone cares there are several videos of Bulava launches on YouTube.
This is one baaaada** rocket!
Not finding any videos of trans dimensional portals, stargates, EISCAT
experiments though. Guess that PROVES the cover up!



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 04:00 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Its no bother at all, really.

But do you agree that the exhaust was still burning while spewing out fuel or other stuff?



posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 04:00 PM
link   
I don't see this link before so I post it


Enterprise mission Norway message



new topics

top topics



 
182
<< 23  24  25    27  28  29 >>

log in

join