It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Eye of Horus
There was a mutany on the russian sub that was supposed to have launched the missile at the west. Due to problems in its design of the guidance system or a bunch of loony war wacky end of the world fanatics, the missile with its 10 nuclear warheads was launched. The russian gov't doesn't want anyone to know that one of there most advanced subs was comprimised by said fanatics, and are trying to save face.
Norway doesn't want to acknowlege to the russian gov't that they have an operational ground based weapon system I.E. Laser, maser or some other kind of energy weapon system that actually works. And that it did work cause the resulting detonation was the energy based weapon blowing up the missile and seting off all 10 nukes. Would that not give the effect of the strange circluar formation..
Your right 100%...
And it was Norway doing a test of its new system and something went wrong...
Or something went right and they opened a vortexx to some other place. Why would someone doe this. I could give you a bunch of reasons. Course most would put me in the catagory of wacko or loon. But then this is ATS. Where even the most out landish idea could be plusible..
S&F to you OP. You've done a good job at showing the facts.
Originally posted by A52FWY
reply to post by davesidious
It is possible HAARP has been successful in anti missile defense and wanted to show the President firsthand while he was there. Don't you think the Russians were putting on a show for the President too?
Yes, the exhaust trail pretty much proves it was a missile launch. Case closed.
Well, just so you know, I am a professional image analyst, professional graphic artist, and also a photographer, and lighting specialist, including a scientist that studies physics, chemistry, electrical engineering, and on top of that I am a private investigator.
You entire topic is pretty much bunk. Don't take it personal though.
The only person that is wrong here is YOU.
ERRRGGHHH why am I even debating with you people... it's already proven to be a missile.. this is like debating with "flat Earth theorists"..... never ending cycle of denial.
You don't have to be an expert to visually see the image has a slow shutter speed... but I guess you do.. since you are unable to see it.
I don't have time to make neat images right now...
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Point of No Return
I did respond.
I gave examples of clouds of effluent from other spacecraft appearing just as large.
Originally posted by sensible thought
Test missles do not have active warheads. They were not testing the bomb, but the delivery mechanism.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Katie
The test on the 10th was a different type of missile and the test was a success. That is all explained in the link you posted.
[edit on 12/14/2009 by Phage]
Originally posted by OldDragger
reply to post by magestyk7
So what about the repeated failures of this missle that are freely listed by the Russians?