It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-Calls for One Child and One World Government

page: 2
3
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 14 2009 @ 07:25 AM
link   
I cannot think of anything more intrusive into my life than telling me how many children I can have.Are we just going to take this?
Thanks for your replies.

[edit on 14-12-2009 by genius/idoit]




posted on Dec, 14 2009 @ 08:14 AM
link   
Whilst against the current NWO unless they are more like the 'Star Trek federation ' one world government ( more like Nazi fascism at the moment), I actually support the one child family system.
Before you flame I'm a twin, but we live in a world where people can and do have upto 8 EIGHT babies it places a strain on the resources of this planet. My cousin has 3 kids, but there are many families that reproduce to have as many as they can so they can be supported by the state, thats not fair is it?
Limit people to one and that is fair, unless by accident and NATURE twins or even triplets are born, IVF doesn't help ( OCTO MUM anyone?)
IF we had a sysytem that allowd upto 2 children naturally but anymore after that the parents would have to pay, you see how many children are born, especially with the 'Chav' mentality, 3 kids by 3 different fathers ( at least).

We DO need to slow down the population growth , but not stop it. and certainly not be picky as the Chinese are, killing female feotuses and keeping boys is just wrong IMO.

[edit on 14/12/09 by DataWraith]



posted on Dec, 14 2009 @ 11:52 AM
link   
The one person who has EIGHT (8!) babies is well rounded out by the numbers who have none or one by choice.

It is not your business to regulate my uterus.

I am not a pieice of communal property.

You have no rights, individual or group, that extend into my body cavities.

Keep your laws off my reproductive organs.

Laws and cultural disdain to punish the most fertile is absolutely ridiculous.

Beyond that, it literally offends life itself. You really are such a control freak that you want to redefine the entire concept of how life perpetuates itself? You think you are so damn smart, that you should be able to force others to choose to favour LESS fertility as a good trait.

Gosh, to think that EVERY organism on the planet just got it wrong - thank Goodness YOU know better.

Canada has no population problem. Canada actually has the OPPOSITE problem. We bring in immigrants because we don't have even enough for population replacement.

Seriously. You want to go after the few people who have many children?!? In THIS environment that is ridiculous. Our government needs to figure out how to ENCOURAGE women here to have babies.

You aren't going to be moving several millions of Africans and East Indians to Canada anytime soon. Ignoring geography and demographics in your pursuit of population control retardness just shows how much your ideas are FAITH. Because they sure aren't based on a fact.

[edit on 2009/12/14 by Aeons]



posted on Dec, 14 2009 @ 11:59 AM
link   
We are not running out of space...lok at how much land that is not utilized in america, the government owns, as well as corporate and big business property, and golf courses* thier are enough gold courses in this country, to build a maryland and 2 delwares...all waisted on a racist elitis sport.
This comes to mind...rememerb the Sullivan brother during WWII? Fighting out in the pacific, 5 brothers were in the navy, fighting the japanese.all died. Not one was left to carry the famliy name and bloodline. That is why, if they stilld o it,..if yuo have a brother only one can go...or is that just reserved for draft time? or do they not do this anymore????
Having one kid, usualy male during war, would most def higher the chance of yuor fmliy and bloodline not continuing then....



posted on Dec, 14 2009 @ 12:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by Pappa_Bear
Somehow I think you totally, missed the point I was making, It's all about greed and power.


No, I didn't miss your point, I just went off on another tangent rather abruptly.

Not disagreeing with you.

— Doc Velocity



posted on Dec, 14 2009 @ 02:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Doc Velocity
 


gotcha, glad I could help



posted on Dec, 14 2009 @ 02:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by '___'omino
I dare the Nazi's to try and return.
It won't end well for them. (again)


They have more brains not to come out into the open. Running the world from behind the scenes is the way to go.

Satanism is the only religion the elite have, and that means they do not care one bit.



posted on Dec, 14 2009 @ 02:40 PM
link   
reply to post by Aeons
 


You pretend you have your rights, and then you stamp on ithers trying to live there lifes, lol.

How many here have trampled all over peoples lifes,a nd did not care 1 bit. If its the same for everyone, than fair enough i say. I mean the 1 child thing. Its far better to make sure people are not conceived than to bring them into this world, an dthat means after conception too.



posted on Dec, 14 2009 @ 02:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by DataWraith
Whilst against the current NWO unless they are more like the 'Star Trek federation ' one world government ( more like Nazi fascism at the moment), I actually support the one child family system.
Before you flame I'm a twin, but we live in a world where people can and do have upto 8 EIGHT babies it places a strain on the resources of this planet. My cousin has 3 kids, but there are many families that reproduce to have as many as they can so they can be supported by the state, thats not fair is it?
Limit people to one and that is fair, unless by accident and NATURE twins or even triplets are born, IVF doesn't help ( OCTO MUM anyone?)
IF we had a sysytem that allowd upto 2 children naturally but anymore after that the parents would have to pay, you see how many children are born, especially with the 'Chav' mentality, 3 kids by 3 different fathers ( at least).

We DO need to slow down the population growth , but not stop it. and certainly not be picky as the Chinese are, killing female feotuses and keeping boys is just wrong IMO.

[edit on 14/12/09 by DataWraith]


It's not just babies being born. People live longer now a days than before. The geriatric crowd (and supporting them), takes resources too.

I don't think there is a population problem, just an environmental problem. We need to change the current system of bunching people together in big city centers where eventually things turn to poverty and squaller.

People in space to grow and towns need a managable population that does not exceed it's supply of resources and push it's quality of life. There is plenty of unused land to spread out and create healthier living spaces with more natural areas in between. Crime would go down too.



posted on Dec, 14 2009 @ 02:48 PM
link   
My having children doesn't trample anything you do other than your want to control me.

It is far better for YOU to not have children.

I appreciate you following up on that matter. Truly.


Originally posted by andy1033
reply to post by Aeons
 


You pretend you have your rights, and then you stamp on ithers trying to live there lifes, lol.

How many here have trampled all over peoples lifes,a nd did not care 1 bit. If its the same for everyone, than fair enough i say. I mean the 1 child thing. Its far better to make sure people are not conceived than to bring them into this world, an dthat means after conception too.




posted on Dec, 14 2009 @ 02:54 PM
link   
reply to post by Aeons
 


The fact that you watch the news and obsess with who tiger woods is having sex with shows that you infringe on his life, and you take away his privacy and rights to gratify your own needs.

Do not say you have not talked about tiger and this non-sensicle story in the news, that has no worth other than to feed humans desire to feed of others and steal there privacy and ivade there rights.

If you have watched the news, and seen that story or one like it and gossip about it with others, than you have taken away his rights, fact.

If not tiger maybe its someone you work with who you do not like and want to make up gossip about.

Everyday people are taking away peoples rights and people just want to infringe on others fact.

I have never wanted to bring someone into this world, and i never will.



posted on Dec, 14 2009 @ 02:59 PM
link   
A One child policy seems a rather silly thing to me. Urban development and the misuse of space and resources are a bigger issue. I agree with Doc Velocity on his point about innoculation however I must admit I would hate to be the weak in that scenario lol.

Were encouraged to eat healthy, avoid smoking, drink in moderation, get exercise etc.

Were encourage to get vaccinated have regular dental visits, floss and all that jazz.

Then in the same breath were told the world is over populated and we need to regulate birth? I don't know. I think perhaps we need to rethink how insanely we waste what is available on this planet. I am no expert but I firmly believe starvation and overcrowded urban centres is a problem based in our societies values and business practises rather than how many children we have.



posted on Dec, 14 2009 @ 03:06 PM
link   
reply to post by andy1033
 


You have a massive confusion about the concept of rights.

Which really just makes sense, with all the other confusion you have.

Again, please feel free to not breed. I believe you are correct, that this is indeed the best course of action you could possibly take.

Projecting your issues onto me and assuming that because you should certainly not breed that I also should not is a massive statement of narcissism.



posted on Dec, 14 2009 @ 03:12 PM
link   
reply to post by Aeons
 


So is it ok for the news to perve into tigers life to fulfil your day, and make him feel like sh1t for doing what males and females normally do. Do you think you have a right to know that stuff.

If you say you have never watched a news item or read a mag and talked about the bull they speak about people, your lying. This is this mans life we are talking about here.

All the people that watch those stup1d news shows and listen to this rubbish have invaded his life and his rights.

So some how people can trample over anyone elses rights as long as its not there privacy and rights they go into.

You take away anyones rights and all righst should go, for everyone period.



posted on Dec, 14 2009 @ 03:42 PM
link   
Does anyone ever get that feeling that there are people on this board who are here merely to be so crazy that they derail discussion of real issues?

(cough. cough. nudge. nudge.)

However, just to end this.

One Chld Policy applicable to immature wierdo who buys women's affections. Good stuff.

But briefly -

Andy - you'll notice no one ever reports on Jack Nicholson's sex life. Because, he never tried to make out that he was anything but a hound. A rabid hound.

Use the media to make your millions, expect the media to return the favour.

If you want privacy, don't screw people who do porn, are wanna-be actresses/singers/agents/journalists.

One has no expectation of privacy when screwing a series of women they buy the affections of.


A right to privacy is not a Human Right.

You have no rights that extend from your crazy brain to my uterus. Note the YOURS and MINE part of that sentence. When the crazy takes you away again, repeat ad-nauseum until you glimmer onto the fact that your skin encompasses the end of YOU.

Woods trying to sadly buy love and sex and everything else his immature head can think of, doesn't negate that I have rights.



End of my attempt to rationalize with the irrational.



posted on Dec, 14 2009 @ 04:14 PM
link   
reply to post by genius/idoit
 


getting rid of the damn immigrants would help Britain greatly, 10 million rise in immigrants by 2030, it's taking the mick and 1 in 10 babies are now non British what the hell is wrong with this socialist soft state.
No wonder people are voting far right parties.



posted on Dec, 14 2009 @ 05:29 PM
link   
There is not enough resources to support everyone as is(people still die of hunger everyday.) The one-child policy is as humane a method to reduce population as I can think of. However, I believe it should be a guideline, more than a rule. People tend to have less kids when they're more educated anyway, so the key is to get the least educated to at least a level where they'll want to have less kids, so that the cycle ends.

For those who think it's their right to have as many kids as they want, well, my counter is, sure it is, just don't expect the government to bail you out. Every kid that you have, the taxpayers have to indirectly support them by providing them free education, health care, etc. So essentially, your right to having kids infringes upon my right to keep as much of my own resources(money) as possible.

Let's supposed that we have a system where everyone gets to keep all of their money, i.e no tax, so the government does not provide any free services. The reality then is that you wouldn't even think of having so many kids, because you know there's no taxpayers to bail you out.



posted on Dec, 14 2009 @ 05:38 PM
link   
So, because people in India, and Africa are over breeding people in Canada should not breed.

Good. You are correct. That TOTALLY makes sense.

Better, even though this very discussion proves that education, legal protections, and acess to birth control absolutely is the most obvious way to reduce population - your first instinct is still to regulate people (females) to do what you want.

Because, you know even if every first world educated nation proves the point that female suffrage is the fastest way to bring down population figures in a couple of generations, it still means that you PERSONALLY don't get to inflict your ideology of forcing women to do what you want with their reproductive organs.



posted on Dec, 14 2009 @ 05:48 PM
link   
reply to post by Aeons
 


You haven't addressed my point, which is, how do you plan to support your kids, without relying on other taxpayer's money?

To me, I feel like I shouldn't be paying any taxes, but I still have to. No one can do whatever they please.

And your kids are going to cost me, unless the government keeps going into debt.



posted on Dec, 14 2009 @ 05:49 PM
link   
reply to post by genius/idoit
 



Can you please use some credible sources and not post from religious blogs since all of them have a tendency to present a erroneous distorted faux view.



new topics

top topics



 
3
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join