It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
exquisite, extremely hi-def Earth Image by woodleywonderworks via Flickr In the name of climate change one of Canada’s major news outlets is calling for a one child policy similar to what despotic China has in place to be imposed by some kind of One World government. The calls for one world government seem to be coming in from all over the World but the perceptions of what that government would be like are quite diverse. The ultimate answer to the worlds problems according to this article could all be solved by reducing the world population by adapting China’s ‘one-child’ policy and enforcing it world wide.
Now we have intellectuals once more all over the Western world calling for some sort of one World planetary government to save us all from a coming ‘global warming’ disaster. One of the first statements made by the new President of the EU was to call for a new World government. This also seems to be the answer coming out of the Copenhagen Climate Conference—that some kind of global control is needed.
The most lethal potential combo that I see on the horizon would be for some kind of Muslim leader to come forth and make peace with Israel, allow them to rebuild their temple, and solve the Middle East mess. Anyone who could do that would naturally be promoted as the perfect world leader by all of these supposedly smart intellectuals in Europe and America.
The worst thing that you or I can do for the planet is to have children. If they behave as the average person in the rich world does now, they will emit some 11 tonnes of CO² every year of their lives. In their turn, they are likely to have more carbon-emitting children who will make an even bigger mess. If Britain is to meet the government's target of an 80% reduction in our emissions by 2050, we need to start reversing our rising rate of population growth immediately. And if that makes sense, why not start cutting population everywhere? Are condoms not the greenest technology of all?
Some scientists, the German chancellor's adviser, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber among them, say that if the cuts are not achieved, we will end up with a planet with a "carrying capacity" of just 1bn humans. If so, we need to start cutting back population now with methods that offer a humane choice – before it happens the hard way
Originally posted by Unity_99
I do think overall, once they're ousted, and we are free and living in Venus style world that births have to be curtailed and all of nature respected, and restored, especially our oceans, we should reduce our population.
Originally posted by Pappa_Bear
Doc; I'm sure your idea would be quickly put into action as soon as you can answer the most important question that TPTB would need answered. Where do they put the meter?