It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The US has dismissed an Iranian offer to exchange nuclear fuel, saying it was inconsistent with a deal that would allow Iran to avoid further sanctions.
"Iran's proposal does not appear to be consistent with the fair and balanced draft agreement proposed by the International Atomic Energy Agency [IAEA], the UN nuclear watchdog, a US official said on Saturday.
Iran's Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki on Saturday said the country is ready "to take 400 Kg of 3.5 percent enriched uranium to the Island of Kish and exchange it with an amount equivalent to 20 percent of the original batch."
Mottaki added that the process would begin "right away" if the P5+1, the United States, Britain, France, China, Russia and Germany, agree to the offer.
The US official, who declined to be named, said Iran's offer contained "nothing new" and urged the country to take up the existing IAEA proposal, which calls on Iran to send 2,645 pounds (1,200 kilogrammes) of its low enriched uranium to Russia "in one batch."
"We never said we will not do this (fuel exchange)," he said, adding that the problem was Iran has no trust in the West because their attitude and behavior in the past.
"They have lost trust and have never kept their promises," he added, "we can not listen to them easily."
1. Post Revolution, 1979-1989
After the 1979 Revolution, Iran informed the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) of its plans to restart its nuclear program using indigenously-made nuclear fuel. Iran paid the U.S. to deliver new fuel and upgrade its power in accordance with a contract signed before the revolution. The U.S. delivered neither the fuel nor returned the billions of dollars payment it had received.
2. In January 1978, Kraftwerk Union stopped working at the Bushehr nuclear project with one reactor 50% complete, and the other reactor 85% complete, and fully withdrew from the project in July 1979 (see below, European reactions 1979-89). Iran paid Germany in full, totaling billions of dollars, for the two nuclear facilities in Bushehr.[41] By July 1979, Iran had paid Kraftwerk Union $2.5 billion of the total contract.
3. When France after 1979 refused to give any enriched uranium to Iran and also Eurodif didn’t return Iran’s investments (see European reactions 1979-89), Iran's government suspended its payments and tried to get refunded the loan by making pressure on France by handling militant groups, including the Hezbollah who took French citizens hostage in the 1980s.
4. According to a report by the Argentine justice in 2006, Iran in 1987–88 signed three agreements with Argentina's National Atomic Energy Commission. The first Iranian-Argentine agreement involved help in converting the U.S. supplied Tehran Nuclear Research Center (TNRC) research reactor from highly enriched uranium fuel to 19.75% low-enriched uranium, and to supply the low-enriched uranium to Iran. The uranium was delivered in 1993.[43] The second and third agreements were for technical assistance, including components, for the building of pilot plants for uranium-dioxide conversion and fuel fabrication. Under US pressure, assistance under second and third agreements was reduced.
6. In 1996, the U.S. convinced the People's Republic of China to pull out of a contract to construct a uranium conversion plant.
7. 2002-2006 : European actions
Around 2005, Germany refused to export any more nuclear equipment or refund money paid by Iran for such equipment in the 1980s.[41] (See European reactions 1979-89.)
Originally posted by john124
The Islamic regime are on their own now, well except for their friends who get some cheap oil from them - like Chavez, Erdogan and now the Bolivian govt, and maybe a few friends of their on ats.
I wonder which country the remaining clerics and revolutionary guards will end up fleeing to over the coming months when student protests overwhelm them.
[edit on 13-12-2009 by john124]
Originally posted by paraphi
reply to post by john124
They will probably all end up as asylum seekers in the UK and fermenting unrest, secure in the knowledge that they won't be thrown out.
To topic... The Iranians should just get the hint that the world just does not trust them with nuclear. I agree. I fear for the future when tin-pot regimes like Iran start making atomic bombs and nothing I have seen, heard or read has persuaded me that the Iranians just "want a nuclear power station"!
Regards
Prepare for the occupation of Iran, somewhere in 2011 I would think.
The Islamic regime are on their own now, well except for their friends who get some cheap oil from them - like Chavez, Erdogan and now the Bolivian govt, and maybe a few friends of their on ats.
Originally posted by john124
reply to post by tothetenthpower
Prepare for the occupation of Iran, somewhere in 2011 I would think.
I doubt even NATO could occupy Iran, the country's too large.
Originally posted by john124
reply to post by December_Rain
&
reply to post by GovtFlu
So who out of those 118 countries will allow Ahmadi & Khamenei to reside in then when the Iranian opposition forces them out? Here's a tip: one of the countries I mentioned earlier. I can imagine Ahmadinejad fleeing or even defecting next time he is abroad.
Don't tell me you still think Russia are still in bed with the Islamic regime? The Russian backed coup has already lost and the Russian's know this. The revolutionary guard commanders even threaten Russia now over non-delivery of S-300! The dog keeps barking, and they even know themselves that the game is over for them!
[edit on 13-12-2009 by john124]
Ofcourse these countries stand by Iran on nuclear policy. Isn't this thread about nuclear program so why go on including non-nuclear issue in first place? Derailing much...?