I agree, this "rocket" explanation is ridicules. What I find interesting about the video is that when the black hole appears, why is it that the
blue spiral shooting from the ground still remains and not dissipate like the spiral up in the sky? If the fuel, or whatever it is that is supposedly
shooting out of the side of the rocket, if that is dissipating why wouldn't the same rate of dissipation be taking place in the blue portion going up
to the spiral? Honestly when I first saw the video, I had the impression that this was some kind of holographic projection...and interestingly many
witnesses initially said it looked like a computer graphic as well. I also have to ask the question concerning the Russians admitting to a failed
rocket launch. Why would they admit to that anyway? All during the cold war they never admitted to failures like this...so why now... if not to
cover up what truly happened, by saying it was something plausible like a rocket failure...


the people who favoured this theory in the big thread, went on to state that said
rocket had been launched from a submarine in the White Sea ... and this is why no sound was heard by the people in Norway (apparently) !
that the launch site (White Sea) was approx 400km away from
Norway, where the spiral was seen / photographed / videoed ... ok fine !

