Asteroid Destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, not God, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 20 times


reply posted on 13-12-2009 @ 05:12 AM by AlreadyGone
Again I reply that if the asteroid destroyed Sodom and Gommorah, that a similar fate should have engulf neighboring cities Ur, Babel, Nineveh, what became Alexandria, Cairo, Balbaak, the Pheonician City states, the list goes on...
Furhter, the Bible mentions Nineveh and for years it was believed a myth, its remains had never been found until the late 19th century, where it's location and size matched the Bible. The fact that your argument is based on two cities , whose ruins have never been found nor documented outside of the Bible, indicate you give some credence to the Book.
Almost all of the kingdoms, cities, geographies and locations, cultures, have been documented from both archeological, governmental, and historical records... the Assyrian texts and even book keeping records show the exodus and capture of the N. Kingdom of Israel. Egypt shows the presencs of Hebrew peoples and the decline of Ramses 2 coincides with they're exodus... while searching for Sadam's tanks in the first Persian Gulf War 1990, denser materials cool slower than the sands and looser materials around them...by thermal imagery we found the tanks, and a densely packed path of sand that ran from the former Land of Goshen in the Nile Delta across the Sinai, across the N. tip of the Red Sea, across the Gulf of Aqaba, into Saudi Arabia and ending at what locals traditionally have called the "Mountain of God". Wheither you believe in God is up to you, I DO, but it is filled with historical, scientific, archeological, and governmental records that confirm and prove it's text.


reply posted on 13-12-2009 @ 05:23 AM by troubleshooter
reply to post by SuperSlovak


I guess you have the following options...
...it was just an asteroid and bad luck for the cities of the plains...
...God ordered a special asteroid as an executive judgment...
...or God pre-planned an asteroid when he made the universe to arrive on cue.

Whatever the reason...it's going to happen again...

Luke 17:28-30 "Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded; But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all. Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed.

I think it could be a good idea to be on side with this 'Son of man' guy like Lot eh?




reply posted on 13-12-2009 @ 06:00 AM by spikey
reply to post by SuperSlovak



I wholeheartedly agree with your theory that biblical stories and religion itself is based on a mixture of seeing things around them that would appear as magic, or miraculous and attributing them to an unseen, all powerful magician or god.

But also, it was based on earlier writings, written by cultures thousands of years before 'biblical times'.

The stories are virtually the same, only the names, places and dates have been altered to fit with what would have been contemporary circumstances.

Ultimately, if you go back in time enough, i think that these stories that were later adapted and incorporated into 'modern' religious belief systems, were based on mistaken identity...ET's seen as miraculous gods..the abilities of which 6 - 10,000 years ago (even 500 years ago), would have appeared godlike...and so, thousands of years later, here we are...with religious wars, my god is better than your god, we are right and you are wrong, follow our god or we'll kill you, etc. etc. etc.

It's little wonder we don't have full open contact with ET races...we still believe in fairytales, even when the proof of the same fairytale, almost word for word existed thousands of years earlier! Yet...still the blinkers are down, and still the pomposity continues.


reply posted on 13-12-2009 @ 06:13 AM by randyvs
reply to post by saint4God





Who is 'we' here? I have come to know God, but have not visited an asteroid. Between the two, I have more proof of God than asteroids...but I do believe/have faith that asteroids exist.

The funny thing is this is true. lol
There is more proof.lmao


How sad for you spikey. It appears you have lost all sense of reality.
Let me conveles you thru things.
Aliens, LITTLE green men, fairys ,nomes, leprachans, elves, trolls and gremlins etc. etc. etc. you do see where I'm going with this?



[edit on 13-12-2009 by randyvs]


reply posted on 13-12-2009 @ 06:19 AM by spikey
reply to post by aorAki



I have...beautiful country.

If i ever left England...New Zealand is where i'd head for.


reply posted on 13-12-2009 @ 07:13 AM by Jinni
Originally posted by spikey
reply to
post by aorAki



I have...beautiful country.

If i ever left England...New Zealand is where i'd head for.


England is a cesspit of god-less new-world order, hate mongering, soul-less, lying, backstabbing, racist people.

If you like that then yeah hell is beautiful to the demons.

You are not welcome in New Zealand.





[edit on 13-12-2009 by Jinni]


reply posted on 13-12-2009 @ 07:48 AM by randyvs
reply to post by Jinni





I'm sorry but it's a fact.

I'm sorry but wrong is just wrong.
Wait a minute I'm not sorry and wrong is still wrong and you are wrong
and sorry.

If God is God I'm sure he is smart enough to send us, who can read, see, or hear a message and for that message to reach us as he intended
so your message is crap and I'm not still not sorry.

[edit on 13-12-2009 by randyvs]


reply posted on 13-12-2009 @ 09:12 AM by Josephus23
Computer simulations solely reflect what the individuals who program the computers believe. They do not "simulate" reality.
This is a common mistake that researchers continue to produce.

Computers assist in allowing for the expedient computation of numbers in very complex situations, but nothing can mimic what we know as reality. A very good example is the WTC implosions. The idiots who call themselves "engineers" used computer simulations to "prove" that the towers collapsed.
Why?
One might ask why would so called engineers make such a glaring fallacy?

Because the physics behind the official storyline can not be reproduced under normal circumstances.
If anyone doubts me, then simulate the fuel tanks that first exploded and then burned for thirty minutes.
Guess what?
You can't. It violates that 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.
Thus the computer simulations.

While what these scientists are proposing concerning an asteroid and Sodom could have happened, do not ever rely on a computer simulation to provide truth. The same scientists that used computer models to prove the official storyline of 911 are using computer models to prove man made global warming.

History is speculation, and most of what we know is either an outright lie or colored by the many biases of the purchased historians.
See Howard Zinn for a bit of truth.

Did you see the speech where GW Bush said that he was "positive that history would show him as a great president"?

Does he know something that we do not?
Of course he does! Historians need money to produce their work, and the money that they receive comes in the form of grants from the Rockefeller Foundation, Ford Foundation, Carnegie Foundation, etc....

Just out of curiosity, what are the chances, probability wise, that we are currently living in a computer simulation?
And do those chances increase in proportion to the acceleration found in Moore's Law?


reply posted on 13-12-2009 @ 09:22 AM by Silicis n Volvo
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to
post by SuperSlovak



Who but God has the power to change the course of an asteroid?
Who but God has the power to set it's course?
Who but God created all things and set them in motion?
I have heard stories of no other.


who????? US!!! thats who...

there are MANY technological methods of re-directing asteroids...some having millions of dollars put into them just incase one comes our way sometime soon

asteroids at the end of the day are just floating rocks...someone throws a rock at you and you see it coming...one option is to catch it and throw it back...another is to bat it out of the way..setting it on a new course...these are all very POSSIBLE things for humans to do

humans can now create babies in laboratories, living cells, basically life itself...we dont need god

im open to the idea of there being a higher power somewhere (perhaps not in our universe) but not a god in the way the bible speaks about...ive heard the stories of the bible and i think its bunch of crock

[edit on 13-12-2009 by Silicis n Volvo]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Truth About the Garden of Eden Story
  Posted 7 days ago with 49 member flags
We Have Been Lied To
  Posted 19 days ago with 37 member flags
The Mormon Church is a Cult
  Posted 10 days ago with 23 member flags
Who killed the prophet Muhammad? A 1400 year old murder mystery.
  Posted 15 days ago with 16 member flags
Where is the gospel of jesus?
  Posted 1 days ago with 15 member flags
Quake Reveals Day of Jesus\' Crucifixion
  Posted 2 days ago with 11 member flags
Is The Bible Real?
  Posted 18 days ago with 9 member flags
The talk too controversial for TED to post...
  Posted 11 days ago with 9 member flags