It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Jennifer's Body another movie with NOT so hidden meanings.

page: 1

log in


posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 10:27 PM
Not sure if this is in the write thread area so MODs feel free to move it.

So has anyone else seen this film?

Satanic rituals and possession, I don't believe in those sort of things but this film depicts them both and I am curious if anyone has a view point on the agenda behind this film?

My opinion is this:
Megan Fox is really really hot so of course why not see a film where she makes out with another girl? Anyway, start watching it and immediately I get that this film takes estrogen over the top with the main and supporting characters. The boyfriend is a total push over, there's some moron a-typical jocks (which I think is a first, don't recall the typical jock character as being sensitive or needy, they also seemed like a bit of a push over I guess), there's some typical moron (possibly gay) emo kid (which, I guess they portray honestly), and the strongest male roles are the evil band members and a crippled sappy push-over teacher.

I think chicks with power are hot don't get me wrong, but does anyone else see a trend here? Resident Evil for example? There was a video to correlate with this but I can't find it. Basically the male role is being pushed aside and I see this in more places than just the theaters, but this is a whole nother subject.

My next feeling about the film is on the band. I immediately got the impression of THE JONAS BROTHERS like many other boy bands their impact on the feminine society. We all know that Disney is deep into placing occult and sexual messages into kids film and music so it might as well be assumed that 'Low Shoulder' as they're called made not just a deal with the devil but rather Disney to turn girls into sluts!

It's obvious, during the song some how Fox is seduced and killed in some satanic ritual and then comes back as an 'undead' slut.

Why mention undead? Well they are almost completely thoughtless monsters there fore Megan Fox has been unwittingly turned into a thoughtless slut who's mission is to eat the brains of others? No, but its pretty close to what she does in this film by seducing every man she meets infecting them and turning them into another almost thoughtless entity to follow her to their doom.

There are three forms of Megan Fox's character, one I already explained, the other two are, the empowered goddess, and the feasting demon! Strange isn't it? You have the thoughtless slut when she's hungry, the feasting demon when her prey is scared, and the empowered goddess when she's eaten!

See what I am getting at here with this film? If not just ask bellow and I will go into further detail but mostly, if you have seen this film, I want to know what your interpretation is!


Edit: Jennifer's Body

[edit on 12-12-2009 by GenLo]

posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 10:30 PM
Uuuummm, first of all, .. its called " Jennifer's Body".

I"m sorry, I just dont see any sort of symbolism or alterior motives here, ... its just a movie, ... created for entertainment piggy backing on Megan Fox's supposed " hotness" ... hollywood can keep her, she's all hype.

posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 10:32 PM
I LOL'd hard at "Jessica" in place of "Jennifer". Good show, OP. Sounds like one of those horrible parody films.

posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 10:39 PM
reply to post by GenLo

Yeah I don't real see too many motives in this movie really. You mentioned the fame from the band, nothing really new in movies. Then the satanic rituals; many movies have had this and as well most were "B" movies I have to say.

Your interpretation though on how "jennifer" is the popular typical hot girl in highschool, and in your words, a goddess within some form; ok. Then she becomes this flesh eating beast... you "might" be able to tie that in with religion and deities but in general, i don't see too many hot girls become a monster. Sure they are evil in some aspect or another hah, but monsters?

All in all I found this movie entertaining a bit. I didn't like the dialogue very much though; so outside of that I give it a B- because I'm nice and just watch movies to enjoy the stories and visual effects rather than wanting to know why this movie was made or the artist's description of how they feel about it. Its art, we all appreciate it in our own way so when you listen to others on what they think and that it is absolute in why they did something, I call b.s. and just enjoy the show.

When an artist wants you to know there is hidden meanings.. they usually will tell you... whether it is for profit or knowledge.

posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 10:40 PM
reply to post by diccolo

It's the porn version, much like "Tiger's wood"

Edited to add 2nd line.

[edit on 11/12/2009 by bkaust]

posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 11:38 PM

Originally posted by IntastellaBurst

Uuuummm, first of all, .. its called " Jennifer's Body".

I"m sorry, I just dont see any sort of symbolism or alterior motives here, ... its just a movie, ... created for entertainment piggy backing on Megan Fox's supposed " hotness" ... hollywood can keep her, she's all hype.

perfectly said.

posted on Dec, 12 2009 @ 03:12 AM
reply to post by IntastellaBurst

Yes and you're probably absolutely correct. Thanks for pointing out the name BTW I just saw it yesterday

Anyway, Hollywood often goes beyond art form to bring messages to an often inept audience and has a history of presenting Illuminati, occult, and sexual imagery as well. I thought the film was obnoxious and that the message being broadcast I have already stated so I'm not going to bother repeating it. Perhaps I am looking to deep into it, generally this sort of genre doesn't tend to speak in volume, however the whole boy band thing and the male roles appear awfully suspicious.

posted on Dec, 12 2009 @ 05:26 AM
Perhaps I am looking to deep into it, generally this sort of genre doesn't tend to speak in volume, however the whole boy band thing and the male roles appear awfully suspicious.

You have hit on something I have noticed.... the trend of androgynous looking male figures in the film and music industry. Easy to see when you compare the 'look' of male stars of past decades to the 'look' of todays icons.

This link is to an essay on Androgny is Eastern culture...there are plenty of others for Western culture
Androgyny Revolution

posted on Dec, 12 2009 @ 07:44 AM
reply to post by GenLo

Jennifer's Body another movie with NOT so hidden meanings.

megan fox is an attractive woman no doubt about it. bottom line is sex sells. it has for years. would you have seen the film if the title would have been "joe buttafucco's body?" i know i wouldn't. hollywood and advertisers know this and market accordingly.

well maybe i'd see "joe buttafucco's body" if it was on late night cinemax and everyone was asleep. ha ha ha

nice thread


posted on Dec, 15 2009 @ 06:59 AM
reply to post by maldronath

Thanks for the article! Its exactly the sort of thing I have noticed. Possibly playing a part in the NWO's plan to turn off humans from multiplying. A-sexual is the future slave.

posted on Jul, 24 2010 @ 06:48 PM
Why would the Illuminati want to empower females? Freemasonry is basically a male-exclusive orgainization. The people in control are mostly male. They use women as mind controlled sex slaves.

While these occult religions or whatever you call them may value androgyny, that doesn't mean androgyny is wrong or evil! Gender roles are oppressive to the soul. We are all spirits with masculine AND feminine energy, and we should be able to express BOTH of these energies regarldess of the body we're born in!

I don't agree with what the Illuminati is doing. However, I don't neccesarily think that ALL of the philosophies they're founded on are fundamentally bad. I'm not a devil worshiper, but I'm not some conservative Christian either.

I've read that among their beliefs are that God is both good and evil, and male and female. I've always believed this, yet I'm not running around sacrificing children and mind controlling slaves! I may not meet every self-righteous right-winged Christian's standards of 'good', but I'm not harming anyone.

Even if this movie and other media are promoting androgyny, SO WHAT? You just have it in your heads that males need to be 'masculine' and females need to be 'feminine', like we're just made to fit these predetermined roles. Well, I refuse to submit to that. I don't let 'God', 'nature', or anything else but me determine what my 'role' in the world should be.

As far as your little theory goes, androgyny is not synonymous with asexual. How someone dresses does not determine their sexual orientation. It's idiotic enough to assume that males who appear a bit 'feminine' are gay, but to assume that an androgynous appearance equates with no sexual preference? Asexuality is inborn and extremely rare. (I'm talking about the lack of sexual attraction, not asexual reproduction in animals) Most people with an androgynous appearance still have sexual attraction. Some may be homosexual or bisexual, while others are not. Sexuality cannot be forced upon someone. Sure people experiment, but if someone is inherently heterosexual, it's highly unlikely that they would live their life being gay.

Personally, I choose not to have kids. Many people who are completely heteronormative never have kids either. We are more than reproductive machines. Let people be who they are, and focus on the real problem. Androgyny is not the problem.

[edit on 24-7-2010 by amongthesleep]

[edit on 24-7-2010 by amongthesleep]

posted on Jul, 24 2010 @ 06:58 PM
Ya ,. the chic on chic scene was soft porn
Only a few seconds but

posted on Jul, 31 2010 @ 09:36 PM
Keep it up Hollywood ....

more vampire,satanic,gender-bender trash.

I bet they had NO problem type casting that movie

.... they don't make like they used to:

new topics

top topics


log in