It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by antonia
Knowing the unspoken animosity between the U.S. and Russia, I have to ask how this "missile launch" would go unquestioned by the politicos in this country. While i am not unwilling to concede this could be a missile the fact remains there would significant political fallout of which there has been none. The Russians whined when we have a failure during our missile defense tests. Considering the position of the new administration, I find it very diffcult to believe the U.S would not have something to say about this.
[edit on 12-12-2009 by antonia]
Originally posted by Dolby_X
Look like the Russian are testing alot of rocket. Hope it dont come with a new war.
Anyway it's look suspicious 2 rockets both failling .. they need better rocket engeneer !
Originally posted by Now_Then
Well it turns out that the US stopped producing new long range missiles some time ago, but Russia has continued to do so...
The two countries first agreed to "continuous monitoring" under the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, signed by President Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev.
Under the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START I) there has been a constant US staffed monitoring team at the Votkinsk Machine Building Plant, about 600 miles east of Moscow -- the site where all Russian intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) are built. - Under a deal struck between the Bush administration and the Kremlin made last year (but not made public) this monitoring is to end on Saturday... Prez Obama seems to be locked into this decision as it was made before his administration - although he has not sought to renew or replace the agreement.
However, the head of Russia's strategic missile forces, Nikolai Solovtsov, was recently quoted by Russian news agencies as saying that the assembly and deployment of next-generation RS-24 missiles would start once the treaty expires. Analysts said that could happen, because Moscow was not banned from developing new missiles.
Hmmm... I wonder why this is? Was it a concession of good faith - maybe in relation to the missile shield plans? Or as a treaty works 2 ways, maybe the US was interested from freeing it's self for other reasons, say the freedom to develop new kit away from prying Russian inspectors? (I am leaning towards the later right now).
"When Votkinsk goes away, Russia could deploy hundreds of missiles," said one senior Republican Senate aide. "Russia is a big country with many satellites passing overhead," so it will not be easy to count missiles based on test flights. "We are worried about what Russia will do that we are not going to know."
Times they are a changing! - This particular arrangement has stood for 15 years...
(visit the link for the full news article)