It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The phenomenon described as a glowing ball in the sky, which rotated and "thrown out" luminous rings. The phenomenon grew rapidly in a spiral, with bright white rings towards the edges and blue, bright rings in the center. Helio was growing, until it eventually was significantly greater than both the moon and other things it will be normal to find in the sky.
"Spiral" also walked across the sky, leaving a bright blue track.
Originally posted by Erasurehead
Ok, for those of you refusing to believe that this was a rocket. Please explain this photo clearly showing a rocket vapor trail circled in red. There are other photos that show this as well.
Please explain why there is clear evidence of a rocket contrail if it is not a rocket. I am all ears
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Imagir
The missile did not pass over Norway. None of the images show it overhead. It was launched in the direction you show.
[edit on 12/11/2009 by Phage]
Originally posted by Dagar
Originally posted by Aggie Man
Originally posted by Revolution-2012
Lol, you do realize this proves nothing besides the fact that rockets spiral, right? It doesn't not prove that ripple was cause by the rocket, it does not prove that the emanating black hole expanding from the center of the ripple was caused by a rocket, in fact, if it was a rocket caused ripple, the ripples would of slowly dissipated, they would of spun outwards from the center and disappeared, that's retarded.
Well sir, where is YOUR proof that it is anything besides a rocket? 'nuff said.
As is often said when sceptics go head to head with believers. It is up to the person making the assertion to prove it.
If someone says it's a rocket, prove it... without a shadow of a doubt.
No one should have to prove it is NOT a rocket ... you can't prove a negative