It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Proof NASA Is Trying To Cover Up The Source Of The Norway Spiral!

page: 10
104
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 05:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by Revolution-2012
reply to post by Imagir
 


Also, the human eye can only see about 60-100 miles, and that's off shore.


If that is true, how come we can see stars light years away? I think that how far a person can see is a variable depending on a lot of factors, albedo, brightness if self illuminated, and size.


-rrr




posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 05:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Phage in addition to my last question about the winds here is another.

The rocket even after beginning to spiral should still have motion through the sky because of it's momentum. That being the case why is the spiral not conical in shape? It is as if the rocket stopped mid flight and started spinning producing a flat spiral. What happened to all it's momentum?



posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 05:07 PM
link   
reply to post by lpowell0627
 


yes the russians said it was a failed missile launch the day after the event!

the day of the event, the russian ministry of defence said it was not a missile launch.

the usual beaurocratic crap, or a roswell like state media slip up?

who knows. very very intriguing.

ps - russia said it was a sub launch near tromso, which itself is an island
in upper norway. must of been one hell of a launch. just look at a map.



posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 05:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by smarteye
So the rocket trail is evidence enough to prove that it was a rocket, but what the hell is a Beluga rocket? I Googled it and all I really found was that Beluga missiles are used in a video game called Terran Conflict.



The "Bulava" (Russian: «Булава», "mace") is a submarine-launched ballistic missile under development in Russia. The Moscow Institute of Thermal Technology is chiefly responsible for the missile's design. Bulava carries the NATO reporting name SS-NX-30

The funniest thing is the Russians were supposed to start production to get this into there arsenal.They cant get it out of testing and i love this quote from the Russian brass.



"we consider the Bulava test to have been a success, since the launch did not harm the crew of the submarine or damage the submarine itself, which was specially outfitted for the test. And accidents during tests of sea-based missiles happen in the US as well.


My response back would be well yeah just not as often.And in the US we like to consider a success when the missile actually does deliver its payload. though admittedly not blowing up your subs important too.



posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 05:08 PM
link   
reply to post by Revolution-2012
 


WTH does that have to do with a rocket that lost control, and rolled on an off axis making a spiral trail?

What does that have to do with the other videos that happened before this that are confirmed rockets?

You are ignoring evidence from the past of similar events. That is pure ignorance. Similar events to this have been debunked on ATS already... do some research for once in your life kid.



posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 05:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by smarteye

Originally posted by Erasurehead
Ok, for those of you refusing to believe that this was a rocket. Please explain this photo clearly showing a rocket vapor trail circled in red. There are other photos that show this as well.


Please explain why there is clear evidence of a rocket contrail if it is not a rocket. I am all ears


Look at the contrail...Case Closed. I feel like people are going totally fruity trying to make this a UFO.
it not case closed, what about the huge white spiral in the sky, these are not rocket. The blue one is rocket but what cause the huge white spiral effect?



posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 05:09 PM
link   
This should prove that its a failed "MISSLE TEST"
www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 05:09 PM
link   
reply to post by Hastobemoretolife
 



You totally skipped the part where I said I've watched TITAN3's tested, didn't you?

You can see them ascend directly up until they're out of your sight, which is well above 30000, and you can see the ascension very clearly, and it's very easy to make the difference between 20000 and 30000 feet. I should get my pilot friend on here just to prove this to you.

Your perception scenario is inept to what I am saying.



posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 05:11 PM
link   
reply to post by 2 cents
 

The spiral lasted a very short time and it did move.
Eyewitness descriptions:

The phenomenon described as a glowing ball in the sky, which rotated and "thrown out" luminous rings. The phenomenon grew rapidly in a spiral, with bright white rings towards the edges and blue, bright rings in the center. Helio was growing, until it eventually was significantly greater than both the moon and other things it will be normal to find in the sky.

"Spiral" also walked across the sky, leaving a bright blue track.

Google



posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 05:11 PM
link   
first which came to mind was an episode of Stargate SG1 called disclosure.
the US and Russia both said to the world that there where incidents and those incidents where crashed space ships ect. when they disclosed it.
also it reminded me at an episode same serie where there was an incident with a massive meteor which they sent from one side to the otherside of earth with hyperspace engine of a goa'uld space ship.



posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 05:11 PM
link   
reply to post by ALLis0NE
 


Do not avoid my question, it has everything to do with it, if this rocket spiraled and left a big plume behind it, I don't think anyone would still be skeptical of the OS, BUT THIS IS NOT THE CASE IF YOU ARE NOT BLIND YOU CAN CLEARLY SEE SOME RETARDED WORMHOLE EFFECT THAT HAS NEVER HAPPENED ATLEAST TO THIS EXTENT WITH ANY OTHER FAILED ROCKET LAUNCH.


So stop avoiding my points, they are valid and unexplained and until they are I have reason to believe this is more than a rocket.



posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 05:11 PM
link   
reply to post by goddogo1
 


It should prove it but people have lost their minds and their ability to research so they just spread ignorance all over ATS untill they get tired of losing to the truth.



posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 05:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by mrno1
reply to post by Erasurehead
 


Again with this...I never said the pics were faked! I said they were too artistic! Show me a picture that isnt in High Definition and Enhanced! And by ur first pic it looks like sunset why would the sun turn the trail blue at sunset? And in norway it was nighttime WTF ur # dont add up! Try Again



It was 8am in the morning in Norway at the time this happened. It is dark all day at this time of year in Northern Norway. These photos are not enhanced that I know of. I even gave you a link right to a news source in Norway.

Go ahead and continue to ignore the evidence. Do you have an opinion on the rocket contrail from the first stage or are you just going to skip over it because it fits what you want to believe?



posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 05:12 PM
link   
Source


“The Russian people can sleep calmly through 2040,” Solomonov said when asked to comment on allegations that a slow pace of replacement of Russia’s Soviet-built nuclear arsenals with new strategic weapons systems was eroding the nation’s nuclear deterrent capability.

The Russian people can sleep calmly, but what about the poor Norwegians who have portals from other universes opening up in there sky. It's tough to sleep through that.



posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 05:13 PM
link   
reply to post by Revolution-2012
 

I think I'm being ignored. Would someone like to point out the descriptions I posted earlier.



posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 05:14 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 05:15 PM
link   
reply to post by ALLis0NE
 


Sorry, I know it in my heart that it not a rocket, it too big for a rocket to cause that effect

The next thing I know when I see a huge spaceship that only 10 feet above and you telling us to research that it a just a venus or meteor?

I am sorry, that just too big for a rocket to cause anything that bigger than the sun.



posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 05:16 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 05:17 PM
link   
reply to post by Revolution-2012
 


Dude no offense, but your signature needs some attention...

What do you suppose Occams Razor would say in this situation?



posted on Dec, 11 2009 @ 05:17 PM
link   
reply to post by IceDash
 


Use your brain, not your heart.

It's not bigger than the Sun it is closer.. It's called perspective.

I can block the Sun with my hand, that doesn't mean my hand is bigger than the Sun.......


Use your brain!



new topics

top topics



 
104
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join