It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
Originally posted by B.Morrison
To re-iterate, discussion regarding the Zuni tribe is welcome and encouraged, but I also seek discussion regarding matrist/patrist theory, and the 'variables' theory.
-B.M
Hitler condemned those who were circumcised . . .
Japan and Russia have low circumcision rates, as does China.
Blows that theory up a bit there.
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
reply to post by BigfootNZ
I will reply with a quote-
A famous example relevant to this disease is Eva Peron, who died of cervical cancer at age 33 [514]. She started out as a street waif who began having multiple sexual partners at an early age, working her way up the military command in Argentina, where virtually all men are uncircumcised.
Cervical cancer is common in prostitutes, but rare in nuns
In a case-control study of 1107 Indian women with cervical cancer, sex with uncircumcised men or those circumcised after the age of 1 year was reported in 1993 to be associated with a 4-fold higher risk of cervical cancer [6].
This figure was, moreover, obtained after controlling for factors such as age, age of first intercourse, and education.
Another study published in 1993 concerning various types of cancer in the Valley of Kashmir concluded that universal male circumcision in the majority community was responsible for the low rate of cervical cancer compared with the rest of India [144].
In Israel, a 1994 report of 4 groups of women aged 17-60 found that Moshav residents with no gynaecological complaints had no HPV 16/18 and healthy Kibbutz residents had a 1.8% incidence [262]. Amongst those who had a gynaecological complaint HPV 16/18 was found in 9% of Jewish and 12% of non-Jewish women. Thus the causative agent (high-risk HPV) can be found in Jewish women, where the lifestyle and contact with non-Jewish men (some of whom may be uncircumcised) would likely have been higher in the Kibbutz dwellers.
The source of this (circumcised vs. uncircumcised partners) was not explored.
A study in Denmark that found 5-fold lower HPV in circumcised men concluded that ‘the female partners of circumcised men are less exposed to cervical cancer because these men are less likely to be infected with HPV’
In a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 1987 it was found that women with cervical cancer were more likely to have partners with PIN
A study in 1994 found that in women with CIN, PIN was present in the male partner in 93% of cases [46]. This is consistent with the known sexual transmission of this cancer-causing virus.
UNAIDS data from 117 developing countries show a cervical cancer incidence of 35 per 100,000 women per year in 51 countries with a low (80%) circumcision prevalence (P
Originally posted by BigfootNZ
Interesting ideas OP, although personally I dont think its really much of an issue. While im 'o natural' , as a permmy baby I was isolated in a incubator and daily given blood tests, which basically involved them using a razor to nick my heels, which supposedly really made me squeal. While not the same as circumcision its just another very early traumatic experience in the same vein for a baby. Temperament wise im shy but not unfriendly, not to fond of unsolicited contact and fairly pacifistic.
My older brothers on the other hand all where circumcised (something after witnessing made my mum decide not to for me and my younger brother). They also are mostly nonaggressive and caring people.
Could this be due to our up bringings, most likely... our family is/was also fairly religous.
So to me, I dont think being in a culture with Matrist/Patrist elements creates alot of the troubles we face, such things may weigh issues in certain directons, but overall I think its a minor influence, with far more larger issues being the real culprits for our societies ills.
Hmm had a thought... did the romans practice it?, since in terms of equality they where very male dominated and aggressive.
Originally posted by nixie_nox
When I was having a son and debating circumcision, I talked to a lot of people. And while most didn't have problems, I did hear several horror stories of infecations as adults, and having had to have adult male circumcision. And that is was truley not a pleasant experience.
Originally posted by B.Morrison
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
Originally posted by B.Morrison
To re-iterate, discussion regarding the Zuni tribe is welcome and encouraged, but I also seek discussion regarding matrist/patrist theory, and the 'variables' theory.
-B.M
Hitler condemned those who were circumcised . . .
Japan and Russia have low circumcision rates, as does China.
Blows that theory up a bit there.
not really man, if you'd bothered to check the links i posted or source the dvd to watch, you'd find there are 36 variables. not just genital mutilation.
-B.M
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
Originally posted by B.Morrison
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
Originally posted by B.Morrison
To re-iterate, discussion regarding the Zuni tribe is welcome and encouraged, but I also seek discussion regarding matrist/patrist theory, and the 'variables' theory.
-B.M
Hitler condemned those who were circumcised . . .
Japan and Russia have low circumcision rates, as does China.
Blows that theory up a bit there.
not really man, if you'd bothered to check the links i posted or source the dvd to watch, you'd find there are 36 variables. not just genital mutilation.
-B.M
Anyone can come up with 36 variables and make claims on them.
I stick to my guns. I am calling BS on this one.
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
genital mutilation huh? Where are his facts..? I think this guy is Really Reaching here.
Can he tell what the exact link is between genital mutilation and murder or violent behavior? No..
CRACKPOT !!!
LOL He came up with a theory that is impossible to prove and that's how this con man gets people to believe it! LOL !!!
Originally posted by B.Morrison
P.S) obviously you're entitled to your opinion and I respect you for not backing down, for requiring more proof to convince you,
lets just agree to disagree
Some research suggests that women with partners who have been circumcised are less likely to get cervical cancer. This may be because men who are circumcised are less likely to carry HPV infection. This research took into account different factors relating to sexual behaviour.
There is a website that is admittedly biased in favor of circumcision but that has collected an impressive amount of information in one place, with 660 references. I learned way too much from that website. For instance that the circumcised penis averages 0.8 cm shorter than the uncircumcised penis (possibly due to improper technique occasionally removing too much tissue and “tethering” the organ slightly). And that an intact foreskin is an absolute requirement for a mutual masturbation practice amongst homosexual men known as “docking,” in which the penis is placed under the foreskin of the male partner. I didn’t need to know that. You probably didn’t want to know that either, but now it’s too late.
Originally posted by ShAuNmAn-X
reply to post by DaddyBare
I agree DB. I'm from Gallup and I am a Corrections Officer. I have seen many Zuni murder suspects pass through and I have seen convictions. I also have many Zuni friends.
OP- If you want to research Zuni murders you can look at the Gallup Independent newspaper. This would be a far more accurate source of information. www.gallupindependent.com...