It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
I just don't like it when we are held up as a failed system
Our way ain't perfect, but none of us would swap you. What does that tell you?
Originally posted by Majiq
HERE is a little article from TIME that seems to disagree with you about the UK's low costs of health care. You are confusing the price of treatments & drugs to consumers with the over-all costs of the provided health care.
McKinsey's report, which was completed as part of nearly $15 million worth of work for the Department of Health this year, also called for a recruitment freeze within the next two years and for a drop in medical-school admissions, according to the Health Service Journal. It said savings of up to $5 billion a year could be made by improving staff productivity, while more than $3 billion could be saved on external contracts with waste-disposal companies, food suppliers and other contractors.
Originally posted by Majiq
Also what about the fact that in countries who adopt socialized health care systems patients routinely wait very long amounts of time for procedures that are immediately available to Americans. Then there are the limits on medications available, loss of efficiency, innovation etc...
Originally posted by Majiq
I think my interpretation of the article was accurate. They hired a firm to try and figure out how to get out of the funding crisis they are in due to the rising heath care costs.
Originally posted by Majiq
You stated that our system doesn't cover preventative care... I would really like to know where you got that info from because it is ridicules.
Originally posted by Majiq
You say that you get all the things there that I can get here, but that just isn't the case.
mommylife.net...
www.telegraph.co.uk...[/u rl]
[url]http://www.biggovhealth.org/stories
Originally posted by Majiq
I'm glad for you that you are happy with your system, but I can't see anything good about it outside of the up front cost to patients. I think no system is perfect but If I have to have an imperfect one I will take the one where I have some choices.
[edit on 21-12-2009 by Majiq]
Originally posted by Majiq
I'm glad for you that you are happy with your system, but I can't see anything good about it outside of the up front cost to patients. I think no system is perfect but If I have to have an imperfect one I will take the one where I have some choices.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
reply to post by Majiq
Again you bring up some stories about some unhappy people, do you want me to do the same for your system? I refrain from doing it because a handful of stories is not representative of an entire system but hey, you continue with the dishonest tactics and you continue avoiding all of the points i made which show you up. You have yet to address all of the time where i used your own articles against you and where you pointed out the problems with birthcare in the Uk and then i showed you the difference in infant mortality.
So carry on using your dishonest form of debate.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Personally, I'm going to chose the one that cost me $32 out of pocket to be cured of cancer.
Well $32 out of pocket if the particular drug you need is one of the ones that is rationed to you by your government.
If your system works for you, personally...great! But we have the comfort of knowing we aren't leaving our fellows behind. To us...that matters, too.
Leaving fellows behind? Who is getting left behind here? If you are too poor for private health insurance in the U.S. you will be covered by medicade/medicare. If you are uninsured, and need emergency medical assistance you go to a hospital.
I am one of the small amount of people who could be seen as being left behind. My wife and I make too much for medicare, but still low enough to choose not to pay the $300 a month for insurance through my work. My daughter being under 18 is covered by medicare so we are fine with not having coverage on the two of us. Socialized healthcare would seem to be a blessing to us if you listen to the hype, but that's all it is; hype.
I could beg for this government handout, but to me it isn't worth the damage it will do to the quality of healthcare provided in this country, as well as the strain it will put on an already damaged economy to find a way to pay for this highly overpriced "free" healthcare.
Don't try to sell us on your Big Health propaganda. We don't need it, thanks.
What exactly could be more "Big Health" than government run health?
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
Would you please allow me to comment on whatever i like?
Again you stated that 80% are happy yet that poll only included those with private insurance or those on medicade. It was not a slice of the population, it was biased. How about we quote the resst of your little article shall we?
Americans are broadly satisfied with the quality of their own medical care and healthcare costs, but of the two, satisfaction with costs lags. Overall, 80% are satisfied with the quality of medical care available to them, including 39% who are very satisfied. Sixty-one percent are satisfied with the cost of their medical care, including 20% who are very satisfied.
There is a clear gulf in these perceptions between the health insurance haves and have-nots. According to a Sept. 11-13 USA Today/Gallup poll, the 85% of Americans with health insurance coverage are broadly satisfied with the quality of medical care they receive and with their healthcare costs. At 79%, satisfaction with costs among Medicare/Medicaid recipients is particularly high.
The 15% who are uninsured are far less satisfied with the quality of their medical care (50% are satisfied), and only 27% are satisfied with their healthcare costs. (Sixty-nine percent are dissatisfied with their costs.)
You dont' understand profit margins it seems. A company requiring profit means that the costs for the consumer go up or the vlume of sales go up. As they cannot control the volume they have to cut costs, refuse care where they can and put up the costs of medicines. Oh wait what am i doing the article you linked even says this!
The second pressing reason for health care reform is spiraling costs, a fact upon which insurers, physicians, hospitals and government all agree. It's been well reported that, as a percent of GDP, the U.S. spends significantly more than comparable nations - around 16% to Sweden or Italy's 9%, or France's 11%.
Ouch so market competition hasn't reduced the costs in your country but the socialised system in other countries has led to lower costs.
We have many problems i absolutely agree but healthcare is not one of them. Oh it has it's problems, just like any system in this world but it's far superior to the profit driven system you have. Our system is care driven.
You know i've used the NHS for years and it has not encroached upon my life. I am able to demand which doctor i see, i am able to demand tests of all kinds, i get to spend plenty of my time with my doctor and generally the system has been good. As for government monopolies well i'm afraid that is utter nonsense. A private system exists for things like cosmetic surgery and hey if you really don't like the NHS you can still go private. The difference? Better hospital food and fluffier pillows
Our people can afford our system, it works, we are still using it, people still have their operations, my own father was in hospital this month and was treated brilliantly.
The UK system is starting to collapse? Really? So after the previous recession years back, which was far worse it is suddenly collapsing. You sir/madam are completely ignorant of our system, it's politics and the financial situation the UK is currently in.
Originally posted by Majiq
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Personally, I'm going to chose the one that cost me $32 out of pocket to be cured of cancer.
Well $32 out of pocket if the particular drug you need is one of the ones that is rationed to you by your government.
What exactly could be more "Big Health" than government run health?
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Where are you getting this crap? We have higher standards of drug release, for one thing. Secondly, they very occasionally need a nudge to provide really really expensive drug treatment in hospital but that is a serious exception, not a rule. Drugs aren't rationed. (and I can buy a Tylenol one across the counter.) And my costs were for parking at the cancer centre. The radiation treatment was at no extra cost.
An HMO that is trying to squeeze a profit out of your illness, and is only concerned about the bottom line. Pre-existing condition my fine white arse!
Glad it works for you, but please, quit pi$$ing in my face and telling me it's raining out.
Originally posted by Majiq
You are trying to glamorize the Canadian system while even your own politicians say that it is failing. Canadians regularly come to the U.S. and pay out of pocket for medical care just to avoid your medical scheme. That IMO is very telling. Like you said to me though, if it works for you then great, I am happy for you.
Maybe you trust government so completely that you would put you and your children's health blindly in their hands, but I am just to skeptical of gov. to want to do that.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
You can cherry pick flaws in the system, and you can find people who are shilling for Big Health that are willing to lie about it. Nothing is perfect...but I am glamourising nothing. Opposition politicians, those in the pockets of Big Health, those lobbyists for more money, material out of context...that all decries the system. Alarmists say it is bankrupt...all kinds of Bravo Sierra.
But...if Big Health comes in and adds its profit margin, it's gonna be better?
Are ya daft?
Drink all the koolaide you're being fed to make you content about your national woes, but don't tell me how bad we have it. You have NO idea how good we do...catastrophic illness won't bankrupt us from medical bills, preventative health and daily care are not an issue...and our standard of living is at least as good as yours. We don't have to worry about what happens if our health goes...we know we will be taken care of by the money we put into the system.
You are finding what you want to find, that supports your worldview...that don't mean it's worth anything, except to you.
Government is accountable to me. Corporate Big Health is not. Here it is a right, there it is not.
Originally posted by Majiq
Government is accountable to me. Corporate Big Health is not. Here it is a right, there it is not.
Government is accountable to you
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Yes, it is. That's why Steve can't get a majority in Parliament and has to resort to the Fraser Institute to tell us how much better it would be if we gave him one. However...it's only Americans looking to disparage our system that pay any attention to the Fraser Institute. We are quite content to experience how well the system functions...which is why you have so many Canadians on ATS telling you that you don't know your arse from page nine.
Originally posted by Majiq
If you have material that suggests this is wrong I am all ears. Trust me when I say that if the U.S. could institute a health care plan that is low cost, without losing quality, I would be all for it. I have just never seen a system like that.
Originally posted by Majiq
Yeah we don't know anything and yet we have so many Canadians coming to the U.S. for health care... Ahh the hypocrisy of it all.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
I have been through this process on other threads and provided material that rebutted the right-wing crapola that you folks are being fed about us. I've identified the sources and defined them...like the Fraser Institute, and as lame a response as you may find it, I just don't care to go through the process yet again. So...instead of citing some right-wing bumph produced by those who can't sleep at night with all that Health Care profit potential going untapped...why not just listen to what the average Canadian on ATS is telling you?
All I'm trying to say is that you are being lied to, so don't pass up an opportunity based upon what Big Health wants. Why should I Bravo Sierra you?
And why should I base my opinion upon what you find on the net...as opposed to my personal experience and that of EVERYBODY I know?