It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Spectacular Phenomena In The Sky. What Is It?

page: 30
431
<< 27  28  29    31  32  33 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 9 2009 @ 01:34 PM
link   
Im actually shocked by how many people refuse to accept what little verified evidence we have on this.

Give me one piece of evidence that is as strong as the intercepted warning of a rocket launch at the exact time and then we have a discussion , until then we have 17 pages of people listing their "wishes" of what they'd like it to be with absolutely no evidence.

People who dont think it's a rocket need to stop asking for evidence of a rocket launch ( please see red circle photo showing tell tale rocket launch and intercepted launch info) and start providing something of substance themselves.

There must be 50000 scientists and engineers out there who understand rockets, metreology and weapons testing inside out and not one of them has said this could be anything else....

ahhh I forgot they're all under the controll of a shadowy organisation seeking to hide the truth about our ability to create wormholes from the LHC to facilitate stargates for ET...




posted on Dec, 9 2009 @ 01:36 PM
link   
I'm thinking that someone saw the movie "The Final Countdown" too many times. Somebody call the US Navy and ask if the USS Nimitz is missing.



posted on Dec, 9 2009 @ 01:36 PM
link   
Jeez, you go to bed for 8 hours and miss out on all the fun.


Im glad it turned out to be a rocket launch which I said back on page three, thanks to the guys at atmospheric optics. Certainly an unbelievable image, good to see its been debunked.



posted on Dec, 9 2009 @ 01:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by jukiodone2
Im actually shocked by how many people refuse to accept what little verified evidence we have on this.

Give me one piece of evidence that is as strong as the intercepted warning of a rocket launch at the exact time and then we have a discussion , until then we have 17 pages of people listing their "wishes" of what they'd like it to be with absolutely no evidence.

People who dont think it's a rocket need to stop asking for evidence of a rocket launch ( please see red circle photo showing tell tale rocket launch and intercepted launch info) and start providing something of substance themselves.

There must be 50000 scientists and engineers out there who understand rockets, metreology and weapons testing inside out and not one of them has said this could be anything else....

ahhh I forgot they're all under the controll of a shadowy organisation seeking to hide the truth about our ability to create wormholes from the LHC to facilitate stargates for ET...


... We've been able to physically manipulate the ionosphere and magnetosphere for some time now. I'm sure they can make some pretty patterns in the sky without the help of a rocket.



posted on Dec, 9 2009 @ 01:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by jukiodone2
Im actually shocked by how many people refuse to accept what little verified evidence we have on this.

Give me one piece of evidence that is as strong as the intercepted warning of a rocket launch at the exact time and then we have a discussion , until then we have 17 pages of people listing their "wishes" of what they'd like it to be with absolutely no evidence.

People who dont think it's a rocket need to stop asking for evidence of a rocket launch ( please see red circle photo showing tell tale rocket launch and intercepted launch info) and start providing something of substance themselves.

There must be 50000 scientists and engineers out there who understand rockets, metreology and weapons testing inside out and not one of them has said this could be anything else....

ahhh I forgot they're all under the controll of a shadowy organisation seeking to hide the truth about our ability to create wormholes from the LHC to facilitate stargates for ET...


I dont think your getting our side, the photo of the rocket tail, and the presence of a launch answer 2 out of hundreds of questions that this thing created.
Such as what created the spiral?
Why the "zone" or bubble? What elemental reaction is occuring to do that?
these are just a few of the questions. Even if we get completely away from anyother theory other than rocket; the rocket is THE REASON this happened it doesnt explain WHAT we are looking at.



posted on Dec, 9 2009 @ 01:37 PM
link   
Here's a video simulation that shows spiraling ejecta from a rocket booster. It looks exactly like this event:




posted on Dec, 9 2009 @ 01:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by OzWeatherman
Jeez, you go to bed for 8 hours and miss out on all the fun.


Im glad it turned out to be a rocket launch which I said back on page three, thanks to the guys at atmospheric optics. Certainly an unbelievable image, good to see its been debunked.


I felt exactly the same way! Woke up to 20 pages of nonsense
You reported it first!
Stunning image non the less makes me wish I saw it with my own eyes

Good work oz good work



posted on Dec, 9 2009 @ 01:39 PM
link   
I'm surprised no-one's been warned to close windows or stay indoors if they live underneath or downwind from that stuff. The sky looks kinda oily in the last of the photos. God knows what's in it.



posted on Dec, 9 2009 @ 01:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hack28

Originally posted by TheOneElectric
Anyone remember that other video from Florida taken in 1992 where the sky was littered with odd colored lights and colored dust changing shapes constantly?

That was called a rocket test, and this one is being called one too. I am not buying it anymore.


Isnt it funny how 99% of the poeple on here dont trust anyone higher than their pay grade, yet as soon as they hear someone with a title say "we test fired a rocket" they will believe it to be the gospel of god.
Im sorry but Okums Razors suggest the simpliest theory is usually the correct one, but this doesnt sound like the simpliest explanation:

A russian rocket with a newly invented propolsion system failed, spun out of control and failed in a perfectly shaped spiral (read chaos theory) that lasted for multiple minutes, then reacted with something in the earths atmosphere so as to create a bubble, and no rocket was located or confirmed to have been fired?

Doesnt seem like the simpliest IMHO, seems like the most logical perhaps in our understandiong of the universe but simplest?


Fair, Fair.

I'll admit that it is easier and more realistic to assume that this was definitely a Russian Rocket test, rather than a test of some top secret something or another. Yeah, I am guilty of jumping the horse, I will admit. However, I will not accept this story as being a rocket test until the Russians confirm it. When they do confirm it I will have a 20% confidence that they are telling the truth, however, until further tests are done and the pieces of said rocket are gathered I can not settle for the simplest explanation in good conscious. I can honestly tell you that no posts on this website will sway me either way. I will wait for all evidence to be gathered before I make my conclusion. Until then I am not buying any half assed explanation that includes Rocket Tests, UFOs, Hyperspace technology, or Atmospheric phenomena.

I reserve the right to wait for a detailed report and explanation before I accept the "official" or "unofficial" stories.



posted on Dec, 9 2009 @ 01:41 PM
link   


plus



plus long exposure equals




posted on Dec, 9 2009 @ 01:42 PM
link   
reply to post by TheOneElectric
 

You're pretty safe.

I doubt the Russians are going to provide a whole lot of information about their newest ICBM. Willingly anyway.



posted on Dec, 9 2009 @ 01:42 PM
link   
reply to post by nataylor
 


Yeah no offence intended but how much merit should we give to a video with this as its description.

"3ds max particle sim of a tumbling rocket stage throwing out crud in two directions. ... (more info) (less info) "

"crud" its throwing out crud? That answers alot thanks.



posted on Dec, 9 2009 @ 01:43 PM
link   
reply to post by TheOneElectric
 


Ohh no my man i was agreeing with you and your stance NOT refuting it.



posted on Dec, 9 2009 @ 01:44 PM
link   
Watch this video from China. Same typ of spiral pattern.

www.youtube.com...



posted on Dec, 9 2009 @ 01:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by wigit
I'm surprised no-one's been warned to close windows or stay indoors if they live underneath or downwind from that stuff. The sky looks kinda oily in the last of the photos. God knows what's in it.


Probably some really nasty stuff.. Nitrogen oxides and the like. I feel bad for everyone who has to live around there.

Then again - who knows what kind of funky chemicals we're exposed to when we happen to be "down wind."



posted on Dec, 9 2009 @ 01:45 PM
link   
This isn't the first time this is happened...

I'm glad we finally came to the conclusion that it was a missile... Now people won't be calling me a disinfo agent...


For your viewing pleasure:




Who's laughing now...




posted on Dec, 9 2009 @ 01:46 PM
link   
Can someone tell me which UK news channels have mentioned this? I see no mention on BBC News website. Unless they're gonna slot it in at the end of programmes where they put all their joke stories, like UFO sightings.



posted on Dec, 9 2009 @ 01:46 PM
link   
reply to post by nataylor
 


That is probably the most convincing similarities with rockets and this, if it wouldn't be made privately by someone unknown with a very vague description. Still, if it's backed up by real footage, I'll accept that it might be a rocket. Can't refute evidence, right?



posted on Dec, 9 2009 @ 01:47 PM
link   
reply to post by remymartin
 


I think I put those pictures up around page 15 or so...

2nd line...




posted on Dec, 9 2009 @ 01:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by aboveGoos
reply to post by nataylor
 


That is probably the most convincing similarities with rockets and this, if it wouldn't be made privately by someone unknown with a very vague description. Still, if it's backed up by real footage, I'll accept that it might be a rocket. Can't refute evidence, right?


How is a simulation that is created "evidence"?



new topics

top topics



 
431
<< 27  28  29    31  32  33 >>

log in

join