It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Nichiren
reply to post by Malcram
Wilcock said on coast to coast that his sources told him that disclosure would happen by the end of 2009 and a two hour tv slot was already booked to announce it to the world.
Originally posted by Nichiren
Wilcock said on coast to coast that his sources told him that disclosure would happen by the end of 2009 and a two hour tv slot was already booked to announce it to the world.
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by Nichiren
Wilcock said on coast to coast that his sources told him that disclosure would happen by the end of 2009 and a two hour tv slot was already booked to announce it to the world.
So why didnt he bother checking when and where that 2 hour tv slot was?
Because he has no sources, he simply makes it up as he goes along!
Originally posted by Malcram
Who says he didn't?
Who says he didn't know when it was supposed to be.
He wasn't willing to give the date when he was interviewed so why would he be willing to give the time?
But it's more fun to pretend there is only one possibility and slander the guy anyway, right?
Originally posted by dereks
As there were no 2 hour slots booked by the government.... he never bothered checking!
because there were no tv bookings...
He could give neither, as he knew there was no booking as was claimed
There was only one possibility, as no such booking was made. So he just made it up, like all his other claims
Originally posted by Malcram
Originally posted by dereks
As there were no 2 hour slots booked by the government.... he never bothered checking!
because there were no tv bookings...
He could give neither, as he knew there was no booking as was claimed
There was only one possibility, as no such booking was made. So he just made it up, like all his other claims
You can't prove a single thing you said here.
And you have a problem with David supposedly 'making it up'?
Originally posted by Malcram
You can't prove a single thing you said here.
And you have a problem with David supposedly 'making it up'?
Originally posted by Malcram
Originally posted by dereks
As there were no 2 hour slots booked by the government.... he never bothered checking!
because there were no tv bookings...
He could give neither, as he knew there was no booking as was claimed
There was only one possibility, as no such booking was made. So he just made it up, like all his other claims
You can't prove a single thing you said here.
And you have a problem with David supposedly 'making it up'?
[edit on 31-12-2009 by Malcram]
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by Malcram
You can't prove a single thing you said here.
And you have a problem with David supposedly 'making it up'?
There was no tv booking like David claimed, how about you telling us all when it was made for if such a booking existed.
Now I know it must upset you when someone you apparently look up to tells porkies, but that is what he did here
Originally posted by Sean48
reply to post by Malcram
Sir
I have read your postings , you are truly a well versed man,
in-depth and precise.
Methinks you are tieing your wagon to the wrong horse on
this issue
Originally posted by Malcram
You don't know if the Government had arranged for TV time in some manner.
You don't know if David attempted to find out if this was the case.
You don't know if it would be possible to find out seeing as any such arrangement would likely be kept confidential.
You don't know that 'David could give neither'
You don't know that David was lying rather than passing on info from sources as he said.
As I said, your post is a torrent of baseless claims.
If you attack David as someone who you insist makes baseless claims, then you really are being a hypocrite.
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by Malcram
You can't prove a single thing you said here.
And you have a problem with David supposedly 'making it up'?
There was no tv booking like David claimed, how about you telling us all when it was made for if such a booking existed.
Now I know it must upset you when someone you apparently look up to tells porkies, but that is what he did here
Originally posted by Malcram
The truth is none of us know for sure if there was an arrangement for TV time or not. So you are making a claim on something you don't know for sure.
As I said, had there been such an arrangement it would be impossible to confirm beforehand.
What we know is that no announcement was made.
That doesn't prove that an arrangement for TV time had not been made.
it would have been kept strictly confidential and enquiring would have met with a "No, there is no such TV time booked" and if it wasn't true, the same response would have been given.
So, if Wilcock was told this by his sources
There is nothing in what Wilcock said that is not consistent with his having told the truth about this from the beginning.
Originally posted by dereks
Yes I do actually - you see, there are procedures for these bookings, they are done in advance and in this case, there was nothing at all.
If he attempted to find out he would have found out that there were no such bookings.
You obviously have no idea how these bookings are made, they cannot be kept confidential
Yes I do, as no date existed
Yes I do, as he has no sources
David Wilcock is the one making the baseless claims here
Pointing out someones baseless claims does not make one a hypocrite. You apparently believe anything he says, and are getting upset as your idol has been caught out!
Sigh. I don't "look up to Wilcock". Typical underhand tactic. If someone questions the slander of a chosen target, pretend they are only doing it because they are supposedly deranged disciples of the target.
No.
I just don't like to see anybody unfairly accused and badmouthed.
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by Malcram
The truth is none of us know for sure if there was an arrangement for TV time or not. So you are making a claim on something you don't know for sure.
There you go again, making things up - you do not know what I do for a job where I work or who I know
Sorry, you saying something you know nothing about does not make it true. There was no such booking
What we know is that no announcement was made.
That is all YOU know