posted on Dec, 9 2009 @ 09:11 AM
Please allow me to fan the proverbial (and literal, I guess) flames on this matter....
Some points that lend a little credit to the Nibiru/PlanetX/Wormwood/Destroyer faithful...
1) Supression of information is a factor to be considered for sure - it is rumored that in one way or another, The Vatican, NSA or other
secretive governing body is heavily involved in both the ownership and/or filtering of data from the majority of the major telescopes, regardless as
to whether publicly or privately owned - and it's not just limited to Nibiru. There are other 'projects' that complain regularly that "the data IS
there, but not being released" (moon base advocates, for example) - the biggest argument from most detractors is "WHERE IS IT?" - we should
definitely see it by now - can't say I don't partially agree with this sentiment. Although... as many have mentioned here, already, this is a brown
dwarf, and only viewable in the IR spectrum. But also keep in mind...
2) Last year, right about the time when (the numbers say) people shouldve been complaining that 'if Nibiru were coming, we would see it by
now' [even if they HAD personal IR telescopes] there was a massive disinformation campaign launched against supporters who were supposedly
providing solid evidence that it was in fact on the way. I'm still not sure I buy this whole theory anyway - only suspiscious thing I've ever read
about this, [other than THIS bullet] is #3, below, but you have to ask the question: why would someone go to the trouble of disproving a theory
considered too wild all by itself, to begin with?! And, the people who launched this campaign had a LOT of access, and a LOT of know-how - and likely
had a team of hackers working in total concert as they took over accounts and shutdown others (?) - why all the effort?! I'll see if I can find the
YouTube vid about it - I seem to remember the name Nibiru Shock(?) or something, if someone wants to help out.
3) The 1983 Washington Post article that was published and then immediately retracted (rumored under force/threat) - I WAS able to find that
For your convenience, I have posted an excerpt, below - I'm sure most have seen this before. Remember this was countered, vehemently and
By Thomas O'Toole, Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, December 30, 1983 ; Page A1
A heavenly body possibly as large as the giant planet Jupiter and possibly so close to Earth that it would be part of this solar system has been found
in the direction of the constellation Orion by an orbiting telescope aboard the U.S. infrared astronomical satellite.
So mysterious is the object that astronomers do not know if it is a planet, a giant comet, a nearby "protostar" that never got hot enough to become
a star, a distant galaxy so young that it is still in the process of forming its first stars or a galaxy so shrouded in dust that none of the light
cast by its stars ever gets through.
"All I can tell you is that we don't know what it is," Dr. Gerry Neugebauer, IRAS chief scientist for California's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and
director of the Palomar Observatory for the California Institute of Technology, said in an interview.
4) Michel R. Legrand and Robert J. Delmas of Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Geophysique de l'Environment published an article "Soluble
Impurities in Four Antarctic Ice Cores Over the Last 30,000 Years" in Annals of Glaciology (10, 1988, pp 116-120). They graphed the Oxygen 18
variations and the ionic components Na = NH (sub4) and Ca (sup 2) and H and Cl and NO (sub 3) and SO (sub 4). The time scale for each ionic component
level as well as the O (sup 18) levels stretches back 30,000 years. The graph shows correlations to spikes at 5,200 BC, 8,800 BC, 12,400 BC, c.
16,000 BC, c. 19,600 BC. All of these were times of great geologic stress.
Not sure what happened 1,600(?)* But you can extrapolate to there and ~2012, obviously.
* perhaps the flyby was 'kind' (i.e. distant) that time(?)
And, finally, and certainly not least...
5) A quick question: Why is there NO mention of the Kolbrin Bible on Wikipedia? As far as I can tell the civs/religions that
contributed to the txt are all legit? Even if they weren't, I see no reason why something as popularly speculated (and hotly contested) as this
would not find it's way into the largest online repository for knowledge/information in the world(?!)
[edited for grammar and spelling only]
[edit on 12/9/2009 by SquirrelNutz]