Another Murdering Muslim Terror Attack in the USA Not Covered by the MSM!

reply to post by SmokeJaguar67



Is that like saying, there were no blacks in the KKK.
I'm not sure where you are coming from in your post.

From the article:

"Described as threatening and confrontational by his two Christian roommates, Souleymane Sakho and Luis Pena, both post-graduate students at Binghamton University, they stated that Al Zahrani often put them down due to their Christian beliefs. Al Zahrani was also described as rabidly anti-Israel, and authored several recent postings on Arabic language web sites that degraded Israel and Jews."

****What part of this do you defenders of Islam not understand?
It was a hate crime.

reply to post by intrepid

You are wrong. I never said ALL Muslims. At least have the decency to admit it.
If it had been a Japanese attack, like some of the newspapers published yesterday commemorating the "Japanese sneak attack on Pearl Harbor, I would have said, "The Murdering Japanese".

The problem is nobody wants to know the truth if they did they would go to the following links.

www.ictampa.org...

www.dailymail.co.uk...

www.sabiqun.net...



www.abovetopsecret.com...


www.abovetopsecret.com...



www.abovetopsecret.com...

Originally posted by Violater1
reply to post by intrepid

 

You are wrong. I never said ALL Muslims. At least have the decency to admit it.

I never said you did. I said any Muslim that committed a violent act.

reply to post by Violater1


Except that your thread title says "not covered by the MSM" ...

Yet a simple google news search reveals:



Why the hyperbole?

Originally posted by Violater1
If it had been a Japanese attack, like some of the newspapers published yesterday commemorating the "Japanese sneak attack on Pearl Harbor, I would have said, "The Murdering Japanese".

Which reminds me. The next time I see a report of a murder in the US, of an American, by an American, I guess I'll need to post a thread on Those Murdering Americans!.

Most mainstream media will not cover anything that may go against the current administration no matter what the topic is enless it is large enough that they can not ignore. And unfortunately one murder is not mainstream now if the student shot up a lot people that would be a different story.

So you think this guy is a terrorist because he is Muslim and MAY have been motivated by his religious beliefs.

If that's true, then do you not consider Scott Roeder (the man who killed Dr. Tiller) a terrorist?

reply to post by intrepid

Originally posted by Violater1
reply to post by intrepid
Where did I ever state," ALL muslims?"



Oh, let's see:

"Another Murdering Muslim Terror Attack in the USA Not Covered by the MSM!"

Would you have posted this if the attacker had not been Muslim?

It's pretty fair to access that you would label any Muslim that commits a violent crime a terrorist.

Please refer to the Merriam-Webster on line dictionary.
www.merriam-webster.com...
As your post states, "any" being synonymous with the word "all".
I stand with the facts reported by the link in my thread.
I never said all muslims as you have implied, Again you are wrong and have twisted my words. No apology needed. The facts remain as they are.
Thank you for your contribution to my thread.



[edit on 8-12-2009 by Violater1]

You know what I find most disturbing about this uneducated, racist rant?...it's being flagged.

Edit to add.....and the author is being starred. Who's doing that?

[edit on 8-12-2009 by Witness2008]

reply to post by nunya13

I can agree partially with that.

reply to post by Witness2008

It is an open discussion. Some people disagree and some people respectfully agree. Welcome to free speech. Enjoy it while it lasts

I think it's safe for us to assume you mean "All" Muslims when you make comments like these:

As long as the terror attacks continue, I will ride up and down the streets of America yelling,"THE TERRORISTS ARE COMING. THE TERRORISTS ARE COMING!"

I assume that by saying "terror attacks" you mean a violent act commited by a Muslim. This assumption was then solidified when you said this:

s it just another coincidence that he is not only a Saudi citizen, like the world trade center kamikaze pilots, but a muslim as well.

reply to post by Violater1


Why partially? They were both motivated by their religion.

reply to post by schrodingers dog

Arn't those just local channels? Where does it say, FOX Cable News, CNN Headline News, MSNBC?

Originally posted by Violater1
It's pretty fair to access that you would label any Muslim that commits a violent crime a terrorist.

Please refer to the Merriam-Webster on line dictionary.
www.merriam-webster.com...
As your post states, "any" being synonymous with the word "all".
I stand with the facts reported by the link in my thread.
I never said all muslims as you have implied, Again you are wrong and have twisted my words. No apology needed. The facts remain as they are.
Thank you for your contribution to my thread.



[edit on 8-12-2009 by Violater1]

Yup, that's only one word though. You forgot the rest of it though:

any Muslim that commits a violent crime a terrorist.

Let's look at the dictionary again:

Comprehension

noun: an ability to understand the meaning or importance of something (or the knowledge acquired as a result)

www.onelook.com...

You may need to work on that one. No apology necessary.

reply to post by Violater1


www.nytimes.com...
www.foxnews.com...

reply to post by Violater1


There are so many things wrong with your views, politically and historically I would not know where to begin. But you go right ahead....I have a front seat to the public flogging.

reply to post by intrepid



Intrepid, would you be as glib if the Terrorist attack in Toronto would have been a success?
en.wikipedia.org...
global-economics.ca...
www.danielpipes.org...
www.investigativeproject.org...