It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by daddyroo45
Trees are a renewable resource,forest management has been working for many years. I don't understand how you can say that the use of trees is unsustainable?
Originally posted by ravenshadow13
reply to post by endisnighe
It's called responsibly using resources.
People don't need to die. At all. People just need to be responsible for the implications of their actions.
[edit on 12/7/2009 by ravenshadow13]
Originally posted by endisnighe
Their are more fracking trees in the US then their was 400 years ago.
Would you like me to show you some photos from way back when and the pictures now.
Originally posted by Sergeant Stiletto
Whatever, and we'll show you hundreds more from the endless suburbs where developers chopped down every "fraking" tree.
Not to mention mile after mile of commercial concrete sprawl. And much of it mostly useless post economic collapse.
Originally posted by GuyverUnit I
So let me get this straight.
They will give rights to trees but not to unborn children?
They will treat a tree as a person but the real person is treated like useless pulp?
"Save a tree, chop a fetus instead"
Originally posted by ANNED
How would he ever get a jury to hear the case.
There is no way he would get a fair jury because about half the population (and growing)in the US thinks AGW is bunk and that would kill the case right there.