It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
Right or wrong, you (and everybody) are a potential threat to every LEO you encounter.
I have seen and heard of weapons being produced by the most unlikely of people. Elderly, disabled, children. Better to not let the guard down and get home safe than get knifed in the back by some old lady with dementia.
CT
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
Im not advocating any precedence. Im saying that in this situation, the officer acted correctly and the result is a tragedy.
And you don't see anything wrong with the situation, one that for decades and decades was dealt with via means of sheer strength and tenacity.
Now it's all push buttons, sit back and if someone dies, meh, it's terrible, but he deserved it because (insert rant here)
Why not pepper spray? Why not backing away and trying to talk the person into compliance - no, he was mentally impaired, so use possible lethal force on him.
Every situation is different so your generalisation is not valid.
No I dont see anything wrong with this situation, tragic outcome aside of course.
Why not pepper spray? My opinion is that it could easily disorient the man causing him to wander into traffic or any number of other possibilities.
As for backing away, how far? next street? next town? when should they engage, when their backs are to the ocean??
They mas aswell have run into him with their patrol car. No physical contact so the germs are kept away, the mad heinous deranged naked criminal cannot get their guns off them, and he'll be knocked down and incapacitated.
I just don't believe people can justify this.
They should give out free KY jelly with this police state agenda - it helps with the compliance when you band over all the way.
Now your just firing blindly. Tangents are fun but not very constructive.
CT
Originally posted by Wookiep
Paranoid are we?I think you belong in the military. We aren't talking about vietnam or pakistan. We're talking about the United States. If everyone took on your mentality then we really would be in a literal "police state".
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
Right or wrong, you (and everybody) are a potential threat to every LEO you encounter.
I have seen and heard of weapons being produced by the most unlikely of people. Elderly, disabled, children. Better to not let the guard down and get home safe than get knifed in the back by some old lady with dementia.
CT
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
Originally posted by Wookiep
Paranoid are we?I think you belong in the military. We aren't talking about vietnam or pakistan. We're talking about the United States. If everyone took on your mentality then we really would be in a literal "police state".
Reading too much into things are we? Im saying you cant let your guard down, not that you draw weapons and handcuff every person you come across. Eyes open and aware. Dont turn your back, that sort of thing.
I still sleep soundly.
Besides all this, Im not an LEO although I am involved in training and support.
CT
But that sets the precedence. If one time it becomes accepted, then it gives rise to others to do the exact same thing, citing references to cases like this where the officers have not considered the situation properly and reached for the taser before they consider any alternatives.
You are justifying the murder of an innocent man whether you think yo are or not.
I was referring to this case, so it is not a generalization. You know that, considering I state pertinent details relating to this case.
Ok, non-lethal shots fired into his legs. Would you see a problem with that? Of a gun I am referring to, just to elucidate my point.
To the point where it is obvious he is not going to be deterred from his actions, and then OTHER options considered. Not just "Crap, naked mad guy, wheres my taser!"
Be realistic, and dont get all hysterical in trying to deflect the use of other options
Hang on, everything I've suggested and even the absurdity of some of it, results in a mans life saved.
But it's not constructive.
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
This happens. Everyday. You just dont get all flustered about it because noone dies as a result. The tragedy that occured here is probably 1 in 100000 cases of a person being tased.
And you go on to make assumptions regarding what happens in the future as a result of this situation.
You are justifying the murder of an innocent man whether you think yo are or not.
Please understand that in no sense of the word, is this action a murder.
I was referring to this case, so it is not a generalization. You know that, considering I state pertinent details relating to this case.
Considering this situation lasted about a minute and you said:
"And you don't see anything wrong with the situation, one that for decades and decades was dealt with via means of sheer strength and tenacity."
I'd argue that it was a generalisation. EVERY CONFRONTATION IS DIFFERENT. They do not compare.
Ok, non-lethal shots fired into his legs. Would you see a problem with that? Of a gun I am referring to, just to elucidate my point.
You cannot be serious. No accepted defense firearm training would include this in their course. When a firearm is drawn and fired, the training it to shoot at the largest body mass. The torso. It will never be any other way. and rightly so.
To the point where it is obvious he is not going to be deterred from his actions, and then OTHER options considered. Not just "Crap, naked mad guy, wheres my taser!"
Be realistic, and dont get all hysterical in trying to deflect the use of other options
I am being realistic.
You are not. Police should never back away further than where their vehicles are located, except in extreme situations. Should they provide the subject with a driver or just let him take the car on his own?
Hang on, everything I've suggested and even the absurdity of some of it, results in a mans life saved.
But it's not constructive.
So you are advocating setting the precedent of hitting subjects with cars as an alternative to tasing. Yeah. Hit by car is less lethal than a taser. Constructive alright!
CT
[edit on 7/12/2009 by Conspiracy Theorist]
Originally posted by crmanager
reply to post by Rhetoric
If youare looking for sympathy you are looking in the wrong place.
"Taser a man to death" Love the inflammatory wording.
If he got a bruise you would be screaming about abuse.
By the way. "I am not against the ploice..." and 'Now they Tazer..." shows your true colors.
Right or wrong, you (and everybody) are a potential threat to every LEO you encounter.
I have seen and heard of weapons being produced by the most unlikely of people. Elderly, disabled, children. Better to not let the guard down and get home safe than get knifed in the back by some old lady with dementia.
CT
why not just....knock him out or hold him down or request back up, not overused tazer
Originally posted by spec_ops_wannabe
reply to post by Rhetoric
You're being sarcastic, right?
I mean honestly, if you had to deal with some guy with mental health problems who had his clothes off and you were expected to bring him in?
I for one if I were in the same spot as that traffic cop, I'd use the taser immediately because I don't want to tackle a naked guy who is probably unstable and therefore unpredictable if he was having an "episode" like that.
Common sense pal, the guy was likely a threat to himself and the people around him, especially if he went so far as to get completely buttocks naked in public.