It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bad man incorporated
Originally posted by Wookiep
reply to post by bad man incorporated
I wasn't there, I confess, were you? I did however, read the article in the OP. It's pretty clear to me. Oh I guess the cops had a good reason to taser him twice in the chest, afterall he COULD have had a gun or another TASER in his BUTT! Otherwise, perhaps they should have exersised their "training", took the guy down and cuffed him.
[edit on 7-12-2009 by Wookiep]
I was in my own tazing situation, but apparently your reading is a bit limited.
I'm sure with a gun strapped to your waist, you would have opted to go hand to hand with a lunatic in fit?
Without knowing what the dude is capable of, knowing he was a lunatic and I can stop him from comin at me without killing him, I would have tazed his ass too. Especially if I was told the tazer wasn't deadly. Oh yeah. It isn't for most people.
Originally posted by 2compelled
reply to post by bad man incorporated
Sure beats having your bones all busted up by protracting steel bars, eh?
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
Originally posted by Wookiep
That is true, but if an officer doesn't have sufficient training to protect his/her weapon then they don't belong in the business. Again, it's a dangerous business, but they *know* that going into it.
So if you agree that going hand to hand is a last resort due to the firearm where is the argument?
CT
Originally posted by bad man incorporated
reply to post by Wookiep
IT gives everything to this thread. People are arguing that these cops killed the dude on purpose.
If cops are so highly trained, how come they had to taze me then, too? I was unarmed, I was ignoring commands AND I had already hit one and about to smash another.. Is what I'm saying. They didn't want to get hurt, either.
He may have been naked, but they did know he was nuts and it COULD take a while for the medicine to work. So in closing, what do you have to offer the thread other than cop bashing? Go bash the ones that taze 10 year old kids.
I don't like cops either, pompous etc arses. Probably why I ended up in more trouble.
Originally posted by Wookiep
Originally posted by bad man incorporated
reply to post by Wookiep
IT gives everything to this thread. People are arguing that these cops killed the dude on purpose.
If cops are so highly trained, how come they had to taze me then, too? I was unarmed, I was ignoring commands AND I had already hit one and about to smash another.. Is what I'm saying. They didn't want to get hurt, either.
He may have been naked, but they did know he was nuts and it COULD take a while for the medicine to work. So in closing, what do you have to offer the thread other than cop bashing? Go bash the ones that taze 10 year old kids.
I don't like cops either, pompous etc arses. Probably why I ended up in more trouble.
So you were conciously ignoring commands and wanted to "hit another" well yes, I'd say in your case you deserved it. Again, your case is not related to this one. I don't recall reading that the man in question did anything other than "walk". Being bi-polar doesn't make someone completely insane. Maybe more education about mental heath should be introduced to the police departments in the U.S.
I'm not "cop bashing". I'm lending *my* input here in saying that I don't think these cops were properly trained and if they were, then from my perspective they were total cowards and took the "tase him" route, when his death could have been easily avoided based on their supposed "training". I am also fed up with cops who make bad choices like this. I cannot speak for thousands of cops, but the tread of cops getting away with murder with or without intent is beyond rediculous.
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
Well wookie the training says tase before going hand to hand so your entire point is moot.
As I pointed out before going hand to hand while armed with a firearm is the absolute last resort. This is not my opinion. It is fact.
CT
I wish I knew who that cop was, because I would send him a giant box of donuts!
Originally posted by Wookiep
I can't argue with that because I trust you know more about official police protocol than I do. But perhaps this is why so many cops are getting away with murder. They are simply doing what they are told.
[edit on 7-12-2009 by Wookiep]
Originally posted by Demoncreeper
Originally posted by Wookiep
I can't argue with that because I trust you know more about official police protocol than I do. But perhaps this is why so many cops are getting away with murder. They are simply doing what they are told.
[edit on 7-12-2009 by Wookiep]
Please watch your usage of the word "Murder".
There was no "Murder" here.
Murder, as defined in common law countries, is the unlawful killing of another human being with intent (or malice aforethought), and generally this state of mind distinguishes murder from other forms of unlawful homicide
[edit on 7-12-2009 by Demoncreeper]
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
Originally posted by Wookiep
That is true, but if an officer doesn't have sufficient training to protect his/her weapon then they don't belong in the business. Again, it's a dangerous business, but they *know* that going into it.
So if you agree that going hand to hand is a last resort due to the firearm where is the argument?
The officer used the resources available to him at the time so it didnt have to escalate to a physical takedown.
Again I reiterate, it is an absolute tragedy that the man died as a result of being tased, but that doesnt make the officers actions wrong. He should be accountable for his actions, but as the situation appeared to him at the time.
CT
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
The training itself is quite logical.
First and foremost is protect yourself at all costs. This means exactly what it says. Reasoning is that dead cop helps nobody.
If I have to choose between allowing you to get within striking distance or tasing you. Your getting a blast every day of the week. No question.
CT
Originally posted by Ha`la`tha
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
The training itself is quite logical.
First and foremost is protect yourself at all costs. This means exactly what it says. Reasoning is that dead cop helps nobody.
If I have to choose between allowing you to get within striking distance or tasing you. Your getting a blast every day of the week. No question.
CT
Then you'd make a crap LEO, and one I'd never respect.
Especially when the person who dies from your inability to control a situation responsibly, has NOT even committed a crime.
jesus christ...
Wow, so you'd love to see the precedent where no cop ever has to engage with anyone ever again - just whip out the taser and zap 'em - knowing full well that people CAN die from it, but with the disclaimer "Oh it's a tragedy, but what can we do.."
And you don't see anything wrong with the situation, one that for decades and decades was dealt with via means of sheer strength and tenacity.
Now it's all push buttons, sit back and if someone dies, meh, it's terrible, but he deserved it because (insert rant here)
Why not pepper spray? Why not backing away and trying to talk the person into compliance - no, he was mentally impaired, so use possible lethal force on him.
They mas aswell have run into him with their patrol car. No physical contact so the germs are kept away, the mad heinous deranged naked criminal cannot get their guns off them, and he'll be knocked down and incapacitated.
I just don't believe people can justify this.
They should give out free KY jelly with this police state agenda - it helps with the compliance when you band over all the way.