It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Gargamel
The use of a taser is an alternative to using a firearm. At least that was what it's original purpose was. To those who are asking what should the officer have done to subdue the naked guy, I ask you this: 20 years ago when officers only had a pistol to use what would they have done to subdue a man in this situation? Would they have shot him? I don't think so. They would have gotten thier hands dirty and physically have subdued the man. They would have had training to do just that. I'm pretty sure that training still exists and would hope that the LEO's are still taking it. To me the taser has made these officers very lazy and unfortunatly people are dying due to said laziness.
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
Why should they risk injury to themselves attempting to subdue and restrain someone who has already shown themselves to be unable or unwilling to follow instructions.
the man was not an evident threat to the officers or an immediate threat to himself or anyone else
He was naked and sick. There is a reason we do not cut hands off or execute people on whims here either.
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
Oh please.
Naked on the side of a road during a psychotic episode is not an evident threat. Easily could have stepped into traffic and hurt himself or others trying to avoid hitting him.
Again why call police then? Seems to me that a man as you describe needs a doctor. Try requesting an ambulance.
He could have been and done lots of things
Yeah, his stupid wife. Apparently she wanted him arrested instead of helped?
I am not sure what planet you read this story on.
Originally posted by Tayesin
I see some people have forgotten something very important. What is that thing?
Police are trained in hand to hand combat, in how to take down another human. It only takes one officer to do the job right, two if the person is hard to bring down.
Remember this: They are capable due to their training. What we see today is police being AFRAID and opting immediately for the Tazer. Gutless people.
So then why do so many of you think it is okay, perfectly good for the police to Tazer anyone? You wold say the opposite if it was you or your loved one being Tazed.
Originally posted by Gregarious
reply to post by Demoncreeper
Guy, I used to think that, I used to give the LEOs the benefit of the doubt. But then I had multiple encounters with them, and now I can honestly say, that I have had a lot of experience with cops, and I have NEVER met an honest one. A good person. Much like lawyers and politicians. I know, I know, there is an exception to every rule, but I have never met them. I wish it were different. But now I consider it idiotic to call cop. I may buy a .45 and start to Open Carry, just out of selfpreservation. If this Copenhagen Treaty gets signed, along with Piglosis' Small Arms already signed, I'd have to just hide it somewhere. I may not. We'll see. But you prove my contention that the good people are either run out, or leave on their own. Just like the Chosen are exiting the churches now. The environment, the social atmosphere in the police forces is now corrupt. Good people do not fit in. Like Andie Griffith doesn't fit with a drug cartel. Same for the church; Christians no longer belong there. And it all fits in together; the restraining influence of the Holy Spirit is gone from the Earth, IMHO. Evangelicals have always assumed that meant a rapture. I guess it does not.
Originally posted by Wookiep
reply to post by bad man incorporated
OR, this was a classic example of:
cop1: Theres a naked guy walking toward me!
cop2: TASE that mother##!!
Yeah people don't kill people, guns do, right?
[edit on 7-12-2009 by Wookiep]
It was sad the dude died. No doubt. But if he hadn't died, we wouldn't even be on this thread. We wouldn't even know. The cops didn't kill him, the tazer did.
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
To everyone suggesting going hand to hand, please remember that officer has a loaded firearm strapped to his waist.
Going hand to while armed with a firearm is the absolute last resort. Its too easy for the subject to get hold of it.
CT
Originally posted by Wookiep
That is true, but if an officer doesn't have sufficient training to protect his/her weapon then they don't belong in the business. Again, it's a dangerous business, but they *know* that going into it.
Originally posted by Wookiep
reply to post by bad man incorporated
I wasn't there, I confess, were you? I did however, read the article in the OP. It's pretty clear to me. Oh I guess the cops had a good reason to taser him twice in the chest, afterall he COULD have had a gun or another TASER in his BUTT! Otherwise, perhaps they should have exersised their "training", took the guy down and cuffed him.
[edit on 7-12-2009 by Wookiep]
Originally posted by 2compelled
reply to post by bad man incorporated
Sure beats having your bones all busted up by protracting steel bars, eh?