reply to post by Skyfloating
One a postmodernist perspective, their perception of their seemingly consensual, homogeneous timeless culture yes is a figment of their imagination.
But maybe so is their perception of a foreign seemingly consensual and homogeneous culture?
I find religion objectable. Spirituality is the development of the individual, religion is a behavioural-conditioning grid imposed by older
But nevertheless, I can't blame the muslim religion. Why? Because it nevertheless what kind of islamo-fascism might be abundant depends on how the
individual acts upon his believes or sentiments.
Some people will blow themselves up even though the Qran doesn't particularily encourage suicide and the death of an innocent human is paramount to
killing humanity. If you go a little south on this blue ball called earth, you'll find patriarchal societies that disfigure womens' genitals because
they think they should take the fun out of procreation. At least for the girls that is of course, because men still need the motivation whereas women
already have the motivation of carrying the responsibility for harbouring and nurishing a family and basically being enslaved by men. Whatever.
Just recently some dude from an egyptian university who wrote an exegetical work on the qran and coincidentally was described as equaling the head of
the Sunni muslims told a girl to remove her headscarf, reassuring her that he had his sh*t together on religious concerns.
People will do anything
if they an incentive for it and some rage-boys sadly make up 100% of our stereotypical mental depictions of muslim
crowds. That is because it's only the rage-boys that we ever have to really deal with so we have an archetype planted by the media. Why? Because some
people were on television protesting against whatever wrongdoing they saw fit to demonstrate against.
And I don't see them going on about indian Hindus but about ..us whites in general I believe....That's because India isn't nearly as much a
hegemonial power as america is the designated schoolyard-bully of the planet.
So everybody frets for their rights because you got some brown people around. Well what happens at worst? Not everybody who's born muslim is fanatic,
and probably there's quite some who aren't even religious. Some muslims are white in fact. And some muslims actually favour making life a living
hell for other muslims. And we think we're so darn important that they're all in on it and will change the law here...Yeah fine for me. You say the
great thing about switzerland is the involvement of the population (now that really is great!) And that majority rule doesn't necessarily legitimate
every decision but nevertheless enforces them in this particular context. So if Islam is the "fastest spreading" religion on the world they'd
probably have a better chance at manipulating us. I mean, imagine there's 95 percent Muslims in the world, who should honestly care about anybody
else? The swiss apparently have a need to be concerned about what noisy rituals their nationals engage in. Should muslims actually be the majority,
the same logic of "democracy" should be applied.
But what do you even mean by "fastest growing"? If they're getting too much children and constitute the major homogeneous group on the planet, sure
you would embody the frightening lefty-totalitarism by challenging the authority of a majority-rule.
I believe muslims are just like us when it comes to being scared of thy neighbour. Maybe all the anger is just an act of desperation. On any side.
As for the town councils uhm...If they have a problem with the chanting, get rid of it. But prohibiting minaretts is just a cock-fight between mosques
and churches, about who can blare the most and who's got the tallest standing phallic structure in town. That's just about self-preservation
mechanisms of abstract ideas.