It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Did somone purposefully give Al Gore the name of his movie? Bash Al Gore!

page: 1
<<   2 >>

log in


posted on Dec, 5 2009 @ 09:33 AM
What I am asking, did someone know the truth sooner or later would come out?

Because I find it highly funny the name of his movie-

An Inconvenient Truth

Oh and for all of you asking why I keep bashing Gore, why the heck aren't you?

And for people that want to argue about Global Warming, go to the threads down their.

This is a bash Al Gore thread!

Please feel free to post everything you can find to bash this asshat.

Here is a great video on two people in Hollywood talking about the Oscar possibly being yanked for his PROPAGANDA film-

Climategate Hits Hollywood: Should the Academy Rescind Gore's Oscar?

Some threads on the BULL!

Nick Griffin covers Climategate and denounces NWO Scam

The Church of Climatology

ATS label all Man Made Global Warming Threads Hoax

Lets end this! Numbers do not lie.

Man Made Global Cooling no wait Global Warming

Obama has had his administration downplay this “climategate” as insignificant

Al Gore lies Google search returns 2,690,000 hits.

"Al Gore Lies" returns 365,000 hits.

[edit on 12/5/2009 by endisnighe]

posted on Dec, 5 2009 @ 09:35 AM
Nick Griffin calling Al Gore "The Pope" at the head of the Climate Church in the video in the link below.

posted on Dec, 5 2009 @ 09:44 AM
reply to post by komp_uk

Thanks, added your thread to my OP. Stopped in and said screw Gore and the NWO.

posted on Dec, 5 2009 @ 10:12 AM
Al Gore is just a muppet following instructions. It's good to see that he must take all this flak for his master's lies.

It's funny in "An Inconvenient Truth" how he pretends how silly it is to worry about "gold", yet he made heaps of it through his scam.

posted on Dec, 5 2009 @ 10:38 AM
reply to post by endisnighe

Al Gore Backs out of Copenhagen Global warming proponent Al Gore has backed out of the Copenhagen conference meeting that starts on December 7th. He was going to give a lecture about his new book "Our Choice", but he backed out on Tuesday. Tickets could run over $1200 to attend the lecture, meet Gore, and have pictures taken with him. Danish newspaper Berlingske reports that "Cancellation comes with regard to unforeseen changes in Al Gore's program for the climate summit." Links from have been taken down regarding his lecture on December 16th. They did not inform anyone of the cancellation, they just took down the page without explanation.

I wonder why the over lord of climate change would back out of the hallowed Copenhagen summit? I guess we'll never know. My guess is that he is trying to figure out a way to make himself less hypocritical. S+F! Great thread.

posted on Dec, 5 2009 @ 10:41 AM
reply to post by jackflap

I guess there were scheduling conflicts.

He has to start packing his belongings and head for that house in the non-extradition treaty country we all know all politicians have set up.

posted on Dec, 5 2009 @ 04:11 PM
reply to post by endisnighe

I love what you did with the opening post. The videos I mean. I have a couple things to check out now. Again, great thread.

posted on Dec, 5 2009 @ 10:55 PM

An inconvenient truth, Al Gore’s energy consumption more than 20 times the national average

According to Al Gore and the “An inconvenient Truth” website, “Most emissions from homes are from the fossil fuels burned to generate electricity and heat. By using energy more efficiently at home, you can reduce your emissions and lower your energy bills by more than 30%.” He also lists a series of recommendations on how you can reduce your consumption of electricity and fossil fuels for heating, such as, "Use a clothesline instead of a dryer whenever possible." and "Replace a regular incandescent light bulb with a compact fluorescent light bulb (cfl)." And of course he leads by example, right? According to the Tennessee Center for Policy Research (TCPR), “Gore’s home consumes more electricity every month than the average American household uses in an entire year.” “Gore’s heated pool house alone uses more than $500 in electricity every month.” Gore's website states "The average American generates about 15,000 pounds of carbon dioxide every year from personal transportation, home energy use and from the energy used to produce all of the products and services we consume."

Here is the link.

Ya gotta love this guy.

[edit on 5-12-2009 by jackflap]

posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 02:18 AM
Hey, hey, hey, hey, hey. C'mon. Give credit where credit is due. The guy invented the thing you're using to bash him. The internets.

But seriously, yeah, the guy is a turd and thank the maker florida can't count.

posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 04:17 PM
reply to post by jackflap

Yes, on a couple different sites Facebook, MySpace, the fans of this asshat justify it because Al Gore being the Pope and all of the Church of Climatology, he is making an impact that is having an overall less carbon footprint.

Using the weak minded amongst us pisses me off.

reply to post by Echo3Foxtrot

Yes, that was another long winded claim by the biggest liar in modern history. I may actually have to start an anti-Al Gore Facebook and MySpace page.

posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 04:28 PM
reply to post by endisnighe

You know endisnighe, if this were a conspiracy site one could easily conclude that you're pimping for the oil corps ... IF this were a conspiracy site.

Edit to clarify ... As explained later in the thread, I am NOT suggesting that you are doing this by intent or agenda, I am simply trying to convey that they (oil corps and special interests) merit equal scrutiny in this respect.

[edit on 6 Dec 2009 by schrodingers dog]

posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 04:40 PM

this is important, we must awaken everyone to this.

long live freedom, tar and feather the leeches!

al gore, what goes around comes around. love is going to tear you a new one.

peace out

posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 05:45 PM
reply to post by schrodingers dog

Some may, but the oil companies do not need me to pimp for them. They win either way.

I am sure they have invested in the carbon credit companies.

Currently unemployed A&P Mechanic, associates in Maint. Engineering, Associates in Bus Admin, Construction Specialist w 15 years experience.

I have nothing to hide. I have used this moniker for over a year now, do a google on it if you would like.

I fear nothing, would even give my email out to prove who I am.

Would you like it to disprove any of your misconceptions.

Look at my threads, I hate the status quo SD.

Go through my posts and look for any discrepancies.

[edit on 12/6/2009 by endisnighe]

posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 06:43 PM
reply to post by endisnighe

Endisnighe, calm down, you're going to bust a blood vessel ...

First of all, as you are well aware, the only thing I said on the subject is that I have no horse in this race ... moreover you know that I think this whole gw is a distraction. Also, you know that as far as I'm concerned, whether the "green" industry takes my money or the oil/coal industry does it changes little. The only way to minimize the pain, is in my opinion to consume less of either/both ... which incidentally also would help us better coexist with nature and each other.

So whatever you call that position, that's what I'm pimping for, and there's no "consume less and wisely" lobby, of that you can be sure. Furthermore there isn't a single post in my posting history, as far as I can remember, that defends the mmgw position, so if I'm shilling I'm doing a terrible job of it.

Incidentally, even though you seem single mindedly obsessed with the subject, I never said you were speaking for the oil corps as a shill intentionally ... my guess is that it's a position that you feel strongly about the topic and happen to have made your last few threads about it.

Still, whether intentional or not, that is actually what you're doing. But only you know if that's by design or consequence. I never accused you of the former, so please try not to bite my head off just for making a simple observation ... lest of course you wish to compound the perception by being overly defensive.

Edit to add:

Here, this is the stuff that breaks this cointelpro's heart:

(not at you, at this damn world)

[edit on 6 Dec 2009 by schrodingers dog]

posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 07:06 PM
reply to post by schrodingers dog

I couldn't help but notice schrodingers dog. You seem to take the whole man made planet warming scandal with a grain of salt. You seem to believe it is a diversion of some sort. You even try to imply that it is not a conspiracy at all and try to make people feel as though they are silly for even delving into it.

You know endisnighe, if this were a conspiracy site one could easily conclude that you're pimping for the oil corps ... IF this were a conspiracy site.

Mmm, so these hacked emails drop out of the sky a couple weeks before the Copenhagen thingie and the "ptb" have been caught with their pants down? Which ptb would that be? Sheesh, this used to be a conspiracy theory site back in the day

I respect your opinion and it does matter to me. You made my friend list a while back because I love reading your posts. These particular ones have me baffled though. What's up?

posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 07:19 PM

Originally posted by jackflap
reply to post by schrodingers dog

These particular ones have me baffled though. What's up?

I don't know how else to explain it ...

I have no problem with folks getting to the facts of the matter, in fact I encourage it. But the facts must be understood in greater context. One of the posts you quoted was me pointing out that it might not be an accident that these emails found their way out just before the meetings. Shouldn't that be pursued or considered?

One of the main arguments I keep hearing about debunking mmgw is to protect ourselves against cap and trade and tax and the greenies taking my money, well what the hell do you think has been happening with the fossil fuel industry for the last century? What, we don't pay taxes on that, we don't get shafted there? Come on now!

So yes, when I see folks ignoring this fact and debunking mmgw without caring about the other side or the bigger picture I get either frustrated with their lack of consistency or skeptical as to their motives.

So, all things being equal, it's just my opinion that it makes sense not to piss in our drinking water and live in harmony with our planet.

That's what's up from my end.

[edit on 6 Dec 2009 by schrodingers dog]

posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 07:25 PM
reply to post by schrodingers dog

Endisnighe, calm down, you're going to bust a blood vessel ...

Yes, I will try to calm down on this reply, but I will not calm down on this issue.

The largest tax proposal in the history of mankind. Cap and Trade.
The largest takeover of business in the history of the US. Cap and Trade.

Also, you know that as far as I'm concerned, whether the "green" industry takes my money or the oil/coal industry does it changes little.

This is not an-either-or situation.

Do you think if this passes, the oil companies will not still make their money?

How about countries like Saudi Arabia that make the huge oil profits, do you think they will make less money? They have already been promised their blood money will be paid.

Now, as for this being a small tax on us small people. Name me one thing that does not require energy to be created in this world? Name one.

In the US, for every family this new TAX is going to cost the average family of four $3700/year. Now that is a conservative estimate. I will not even bring up the government propaganda numbers.

This whole thing is a farce and anyone that backs the CO2 lie is a shill in my eyes. Maybe not their complete fault but still backing the Globalist Agenda.

edit to add-explain to me how Carbon Credits will stop the things the two videos that you posted? Oh, it may be that the Huge corporations need more money to pay their blood money. Is this how you expect to make a difference?

One more thing, my anger, threads and posts, do you assume that this is helping the oil companies agenda?

edit to also add-SD and I buried the hatchet-in TPTB back.

[edit on 12/6/2009 by endisnighe]

posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 07:55 PM
reply to post by schrodingers dog

I see what you mean. Let me offer a different perspective for you to consider. Sun power is a free source of energy. Wind is a free source of energy. There are others but let's stop there.

These power and banking conglomerates were about to make us pay dearly for providing energy to us in the form of green energy that is much more expensive to devise. It's friggin free. Think about it.

They systematically over time pushed the whole global warming thing in our faces and made us feel as though it was our fault for needing this dirty power. Then in come the knights in shining armor with there "green solutions" to save the day because we need saving from our putrid selves and offered pricey carbon credits to those who needed to make themselves feel better.

So let's all pay for the free energy and always be reminded that we almost killed all the polar bears.

posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 08:02 PM
reply to post by jackflap

I don't disagree with any of that, in fact I wholeheartedly believe that cap & trade is a terrible idea on all fronts ... including the getting screwed by the ptb front and not actually doing anything to improve the way we treat each other and our environment.

[edit on 6 Dec 2009 by schrodingers dog]

posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 08:15 PM
reply to post by schrodingers dog

Thanks for taking what I posted seriously. The thing is, I believe that we don't need the ptb to improve how we treat eachother or the environment. I believe that without them, things would drastically change for the better and they know it.

new topics

top topics

<<   2 >>

log in