It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Nick Griffin covers Climate gate and denounces NWO Scam

page: 6
105
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 09:12 AM
link   
How come Griffin is called a rascist, yet Blair and Brown have persecuted
white working Brits for over 10 years and it's acceptable ?




posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 09:14 AM
link   
Wow....


Hitler gave money to charity once...


Let's all praise him too.


:shk:



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 09:17 AM
link   
reply to post by littlebunny
 



Yes I would be plenty warm enough in the sun shone/shine... Where does cold come from? Where does almost ALL THE HEAT COME FROM???


The sun is the source of the majority of the EM radiation that hits the Earth. Please specify where I contradicted that scientific statement.

You cannot state that the sun is the only factor to keep in this warmth, as it would be an absurd statement. Compare the differences of temperatures between the Earth and the Moon (one having an atmosphere, the other one having a negligible atmosphere).

Would you be warm enough at -10 degrees C in Russia stood outside in sunlight??? I think not!



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 09:22 AM
link   
reply to post by littlebunny
 


Read my earlier comment again:


There is no data to prove that every single body in the solar system is warming - not even most of the planets.


4 planets warming is not proof of the entire solar system warming!

There's many more than 450 papers that support man-made global warming. Why don't you actually provide some science from the papers you support, rather than waving around a batch of papers?!

[edit on 6-12-2009 by john124]



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 09:29 AM
link   
reply to post by john124
 



Can anything on this Earth survive without Sun light? I think not!!!


Let alone, I do believe the moon is extremely HOT on one side and extremely cold on the dark side... its been awhile since I had to study the moon, but I guess I can go look for sources...


But let us not forget you said this...john124 said... near the end of page 5... "There is no data to prove that every single body in the solar system is warming - not even most of the planets.


Are you now willing to admit you were completely uneducated with regards to what is happening within our solar system? I mean you did purposely ignore my rebuttal to that ridiculous statement of yours... Good news is I never allow truth to be ignored!


Oh, and it gets cold here in the Northern Hemisphere because the angle of our planet has moved ever so slightly away from the Sun… Tiz summer time down south… I guess the core of the Earth is responsible for that… no no, CO2 is! How incredibly laughable!


--Charles Marcello



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 09:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by john124
reply to post by littlebunny
 


Read my earlier comment again:


There is no data to prove that every single body in the solar system is warming - not even most of the planets.


4 planets warming is not proof of the entire solar system warming!

There's many more than 450 papers that support man-made global warming. Why don't you actually provide some science from the papers you support, rather than waving around a batch of papers?!

[edit on 6-12-2009 by john124]



Oh my GOD! Are you serious!!! I gave you links to MARS, Jupiter and Pluto... each one moving further and further away from the Sun, let alone Planet Earth and you say that is not proof... I purposely chose those links to show how no matter how far you get away from the Sun planets are warming, and you firmly place your head in your… umm, in the sand and claim that is not proof…ARE YOU KIDDENING ME!???

And why don't you sit your ass down and READ them all instead of demanding I hold your hand! I have read the so called science… that the entire world knows is in fact tainted science… that says man is responsible. So now you sit down and read why man is not!


For the love of peter, paul and all the other disciples, how freaken lazy are you!!!


But I will give you Kudos for not ignoring my rebuttal completely... Now go learn some truth about our world and why man cannot be the cause!


--Charles Marcello


[edit on 6-12-2009 by littlebunny]



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 09:38 AM
link   
reply to post by littlebunny
 


To your post of 8:29
you have the right idea, we are being controlled and manipulated but the wrong group. You have just decided now to speak up? You have decided these Climate scientists are the hoaksters trying to control you? What do they get out of it bunny? Do you think it might be Exxon_Mobil getting something out of this? If you continue to blame the poor scientist working for peanuts...consider yourself completely and thoroughly duped.
Follow the money.

Republican Conservatives are the manipulators/the Illumnati warriors of old, organized and with a specific agenda: Maintain a perpetual state of WAR enabling a few to control the many through fear and outrage. Heritage and entitlement go hand in hand, while tremendous sums of money funneled to advance our “muscular military” are siphoned off the top - like icing from a cake.
Idle hands threaten the status quo so we work long hours at low wages keeping our noses to the grindstone in hopes of attaining the American dream - A dream constantly being pushed a little farther out of reach. If your head happens to bob up from the sand to see where your money is going, it’s pushed back down by another worry. When you can't take it anymore you’re pitted against another worker who’s made to seem responsible for these stifling conditions. The two of you fight but never get close to the truth. You ain't getting no vacation.

You are right. There is a conspiracy.
Republican-Conservatives backed by major corps like Exxon want to drill for natural gas, they come from coal states, some want to drill oil off our coasts. Do ya think they are going to let a little thing like global warming stop them from using these resources. No. They will devise some way to make you doubt it is happening so they can make their money drilling selling burning and ripping people off. You are only a "worker bee" not the elite and you will never be the elite. It isn't designed that way. Climate change is not the hoax- this is the hoax.


[edit on 6-12-2009 by rusethorcain]



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 09:46 AM
link   
I'm glad to see there are views opposing the globalisation of the world.. even if it is Nick Griffin, and even tho I feel his speaking out is only beucase it will be what his voters want to hear, it is a start.. We do need truthful and honest debate on this subject.. but it appears that is impossible.

I beleive in Global warming, but I beleive we are in a natural cycle, that does not mean we should not work to limit the effect, we should.

I am really doubtful on the whole man made topic, and even if that turns out to be true, as a person who has implemented EU enviromental directives at the ground level. I can not see the action that I or any of my collegues in other corporates have taken on the ground as being anything other than profit making, or at the very least negating any loss by circumventing those directives. If any action I have taken is benificial to the planet it would be a coincidence.

I am also anti-globalisation, I for one do not want to go anywhere in the world and walk down the same high street (main street) and see the same products and goods, and the same greyness every where.. that is an awful fate for so many unique cultures and traditions (including my own).


[edit on 6/12/09 by thoughtsfull]



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 09:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by rusethorcain
reply to post by littlebunny
 


To your post of 8:29
you have the right idea, we are being controlled and manipulated but the wrong group. You have just decided now to speak up? You have decided these Climate scientists are the hoaksters trying to control you? What do they get out of it bunny? Do you think it might be Exxon_Mobil getting something out of this? If you continue to blame the poor scientist working for peanuts...consider yourself completely and thoroughly duped.
Follow the money.



What do they get out of it, they get a warped dream of a evil Socialist Utopia… all one has to do is read the laws they are trying to pass to see what they get out of it! Its a damn shame/sham and thank god people are starting to wake up to this nonsense!



Republican Conservatives are the manipulators/the Illumnati warriors of old, organized and with a specific agenda: Maintain a perpetual state of WAR enabling a few to control the many through fear and outrage. Heritage and entitlement go hand in hand, while tremendous sums of money funneled to advance our “muscular military” are siphoned off the top - like icing from a cake.



What pure nonsense... Every single Democrat save for 1 voted for the war on terror, voted to invade Iraq, voted to steal our freedoms, voted to give mulligans to major Businesses while us little people are forced to foot the bill, and lose everything if we cannot pay our bills... DO NOT make this a Republican did this all alone nonsense, or you will be tagged a LIAR!



Idle hands threaten the status quo so we work long hours at low wages keeping our noses to the grindstone in hopes of attaining the American dream - A dream constantly being pushed a little farther out of reach. If your head happens to bob up from the sand to see where your money is going, it’s pushed back down by another worry. When you can't take it anymore you’re pitted against another worker who’s made to seem responsible for these stifling conditions. The two of you fight but never get close to the truth. You ain't getting no vacation.



I will agree this seems to be happening, but it is not a Right vs Left... it is those who have money and power trying to make sure us lowly servants cannot gain our own power... You need to wake up and stop all this Right vs Left... Yes I admit I absolutely hate Socialism... my reasons are because how destructive that political belief is to the human spirit. Also, it is greed not Capitalism that is at fault... We need to create and pass laws that makes greed that hurts or destroys peoples lives punishable by death. Same with politicians regardless of party or Judges regardless of Stature, who abuse their privilege to serve, they too must be put to death.... Those are answers, forcing the people to live in chains is not!



You are right. There is a conspiracy.
Republican-Conservatives backed by major corps like Exxon want to drill for natural gas, they come from coal states, some want to drill oil off our coasts. Do ya think they are going to let a little thing like global warming stop them from using these resources. No. They will devise some way to make you doubt it is happening so they can make their money drilling selling burning and ripping people off. You are only a "worker bee" not the elite and you will never be the elite. It isn't designed that way. Climate change is not the hoax- this is the hoax.



Climate Change most certainly is a HOAX... The more we learn about our past the more we realize just how normal our climate is behaving... to even suggest otherwise is a damn lie... The only HOAX is you believe giving power to a very small but powerful group of people will be good for all of humanity... That is the greatest HOAX of all TIME! And it will fail... People are waking up for a whole host of reasons, least of all this man caused Climate Change nonsense... and by god we are over it!


Because of Climate Gate there needs to be a time out and there needs to be a open and honest reexamination of the facts, anything short of that then we will know for a fact we are being forced feed... to which I plan to resist completely!


--Charles Marcello



[edit on 6-12-2009 by littlebunny]



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 09:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by MaxBlack
I find it ritualistic in nature that the Copenhagen gathering begins on the aniversary of Pearl Harbor, Dec. 7, 1941.

It was the day of infamy that most remember from knowing their history and as such it is odd that the beginning of the global government would pin its beginning on such an auspicious date. It is done as if to undermine the fight for freedom vs the fight for the creation of a communist global authority. From what I have read once you agree to enter into the treaty there is no way to get out and more importantly it is a type of communist organization with no nations voting to authorize anything.

These criminal international despots want complete control over us and want no one or any electorial system of votes to impeade that control. It is for this reason alone that it alarms me that Obama has requested of the DOD to build a million man army to be used against Americans during the coming created financial collapse and social crisis. It further alarms me that the Obama regime would agree to send 30K soldiers to Afgahnistan while covertly attempting to disguise the return of 200K soldiers from European, Asian and other countries around the planet as part of building that million man army.

Time will tell but at present I feel that the noose of time is slowly constricting around the neck of America. One could hope that logic and openmindness exists at the Copenhagen gathering but all evidence points to a contrived global warming claim in order to buy time for the these international criminals to penetrate and corrupt many of the infastructure organizational people stuctures that help support a move from democractic rule to a fascist dictatorship.

We should observe with care what transpires next in regard to climate gate because it will signal much about what might lie beyond Copenhagen's gathering over a hoax of planetary proportions.


ALL HAIL EXXON MOBIL!
It is irresponsible for you to spread viscous, deliberate lies about the President forming an a million man army against Americans...but I guess you get to make up stuff (maybe you even believe what you are saying??!!) on websites like this.



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 10:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by mushibrain

Originally posted by jimmyx

Originally posted by unicorn1
reply to post by komp_uk
 


Many thanks for posting this. Star and flag! Star and flag also to the much maligned Nick Griffen. I think he might just have got my vote....


so you have no problem with more CO2 in the air
fossil fuels use oxygen to burn which humans need to live, fossil fuels produce CO2 which kills humans.
we may be able to adapt to cooler and hotter parts of the world, but we can't adapt to less oxygen and higher concentrations of deadly gases. to me anyway this is pretty simple, and should not be based on political thinking.

[edit on 6-12-2009 by jimmyx]


jimmyx, oxygen does not evaporate into the space
it's still here, recycled for our consumption. Actually the same goes for CO2
trees need CO2 do they not? So aren’t we helping trees by burning fossils?
What I am saying, don't be played by either side. Less toxins, less crap in our oceans is great, but fiddling the numbers about AGW in order to push global government is not great. On the other hand, close all borders as nationalists want is also not great. You want to globalize freedom of movement, trade and exchange between people, but close borders on governmental control keep the governance as localized as possible (without paying too much for localization, there is a happy middle somewhere). Like the internet, at least for now.



of course trees and plants need CO2...but the point that was made by the scientists, is that the amount or concentration of CO2 is rising dramatically. cooling and warming we can adapt to, but the earth's natural ability to absorb CO2 through photosynthesis is not keeping up with the amount of CO2 we are now producing. and if the tempature hits a tipping point in the northern permafrost of russia and canada, vast amounts of methane will be released...now the earth will do just fine, it will slowly go through it's cycle and re-adjust to a balanced state...but we as humans might not have a few thousand years to live without a proper amount of oxygen.

[edit on 6-12-2009 by jimmyx]



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 10:32 AM
link   
reply to post by littlebunny
 



Can anything on this Earth survive without Sun light? I think not!!!


Please show where I said life cannot survive without sunlight. And life requires more than sunlight as well which should not be forgotten.


Let alone, I do believe the moon is extremely HOT on one side and extremely cold on the dark side... its been awhile since I had to study the moon, but I guess I can go look for sources...


The point being: an atmosphere makes a difference, and greenhouse gases within it along with added levels of CO2 above a sustainable level.


Oh, and it gets cold here in the Northern Hemisphere because the angle of our planet has moved ever so slightly away from the Sun… Tiz summer time down south… I guess the core of the Earth is responsible for that… no no, CO2 is! How incredibly laughable!


I didn't say that!
My earlier comment was merely an example of why we need more than sunlight to survive, as you suggested there were no other factors besides sunlight to consider.


Are you now willing to admit you were completely uneducated with regards to what is happening within our solar system?


Again I'll refer you back to my previous comment (again!), that you even quoted!



"There is no data to prove that every single body in the solar system is warming - not even most of the planets.


Yes that comment is still correct, along with there being no proof that a change in the Sun is the major cause of the warming on some of the planets. Here's a good explanation of why:

blogs.discovermagazine.com...


There is some news making the rounds that Earth is not the only planet experiencing global warming. Mars, for example, possibly appears to be getting a bit warmer, as are Jupiter, Neptune’s moon Triton, and even Pluto.

First off, I want to make a very big point here: the changes in the Earth due to global warming, while real, are somewhat subtle. Yet the Earth gets most of its heat from the Sun, so if the Sun were the cause, we’d expect the effects of warming to be much stronger on Earth than any outer planets. So any really strong signal of global warming on outer planets like Jupiter or especially Pluto, if real, are very unlikely to be due to the Sun.

Second, what I am seeing in these arguments is a very dangerous practice called "cherry picking"; selectively picking out data that support your argument and ignoring contrary evidence. It certainly looks interesting that Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Triton, and Pluto are warming, and if that’s all you heard then it seems logical to think maybe the Sun is the cause. But they aren’t the only objects in the solar system. What about Mercury, Venus, Saturn, Uranus… and if you include Triton to support your case, you’d better also take a good look at the nearly 100 other sizable moons in the solar system. Are they warming too?

I have heard nothing about them in these arguments, and I suspect it’s because there’s not much to say. If they are not warming, then deniers won’t mention them, and scientists won’t report it because there is nothing to report ("News flash: Phobos still the same temperature!" is unlikely to get into Planetary Science journals). However, I can’t say that with conviction, because the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Any planetary scientists reading this blog entry, please contact me. I’m interested in hearing more.

Third, if you actually read the articles about the specific cases of planetary warming to which I linked above, you see that they all have separate explanations:


The explanations are given at the source, if you read further!


I'll post Mars for you to make it easier for you:


Mars: To start, is Mars even warming globally at all? Perhaps not — it might be a local effect. And if it is global, there already is an idea of why that might be happening: it would be due to periodic changes in its orbit, called Milankovitch cycles. The Earth has them too, and they do affect our climate. And the guy who is proposing that the Sun is warming Mars doesn’t think CO2 is a greenhouse gas. I think his science is a little suspect. His reasoning is certainly specious– he says if Mars and Earth are both warming, it must be due to the Sun. As I point out above, that is clearly not necessarily the case. Even if this martian warming turns out to be true, it may just be a natural effect of the shape of the orbit of Mars.


And here's a nice little summary for you:


Plus, let’s think about this: Pluto is more than 30 times farther away from the Sun than the Earth is. If the Sun were warming up enough to affect Pluto at that vast distance, it would blowtorch the Earth. If the effects of Earth’s global warming are subtle enough to argue about at all, then it’s safe to assume the changes on Pluto are completely irrelevant to the argument.

So where does that leave us? When I look at all of this, I see a handful of the 100 large solar system bodies showing some evidence of local warming (Jupiter’s spot), some evidence of systemic warming with known causes that are a lot more likely than the Sun heating up (like well-understood orbital variations), and some evidence that any warming experienced by these bodies is possibly being exaggerated in the reporting.

I also see cherry-picking, with no mention of the other planets and moons in the solar system.

And what of the Sun? Is it possible that the Earth’s warming is caused by our nearest star?

Of course it’s possible. There are links to the Sun’s behavior and Earth’s climate (look up the Maunder minimum for some interesting reading), and it would be foolish to simply deny this. However, this is a vastly complex and difficult system to understand, and simply claiming "Yes it’s due to the Sun" or "No it’s not due to the Sun" is certainly naive.


And as for your 2nd most recent comment - I think you need to read that again after reading the whole of the badastronomy source, and take a deep breaths and try not to be too embarrassed.


[edit on 6-12-2009 by john124]



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 10:39 AM
link   
what is sad is that with this much dissention among educated people...we will not change and our grandchildren are going to adapt.



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 10:43 AM
link   
reply to post by john124
 


Try not to be to embarrassed? How laughable! That source is from a BLOG SITE! Wow, then everything I have said about man caused global warming are the FACTS, and no one need read anything else! What a freaken joke your post is! A blog site is what you are using to refute the Science, while at the same time claiming others cannot use their own opinions to refute the science... and then you end your post with do not be to embarrassed... once again... HOW LAUGHABLE!!!


And to use that blog site in an attempt to make your ridiculous statement seem less ridiculous, just makes your statement even that much more absurd!


The only part of your quoted posts that I believe completely and totally sums up the entire man caused Global Warming nonsense was this line...

...what I am seeing in these arguments is a very dangerous practice called "cherry picking"; selectively picking out data that support your argument and ignoring contrary evidence.

--Charles Marcello



[edit on 6-12-2009 by littlebunny]



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 10:48 AM
link   
reply to post by littlebunny
 


The blog has links for the explanations to why some of the planets are warming. You can always use google to further your understanding as well.

This source explains the MilanKovitch Cycles: www.homepage.montana.edu...

You're possibly one post away from being added to the ignore list. If you continue to be in denial, then there's only so much I can be bothered to say to you.

You might as well blame the spaghetti monster or hyperdimensional portals, because you have the same amount of proof that the sun is warming up, to provide the major cause of solar system objects heating up.

I welcome healthy scepticism, but not anti-science denials.

[edit on 6-12-2009 by john124]



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 10:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by john124
reply to post by littlebunny
 


The blog has links for the explanations to why some of the planets are warming. You can always use google to further your understanding as well.

This source explains the MilanKovitch Cycles on Mars: www.homepage.montana.edu...

You're possibly one post away from being added to the ignore list. If you continue to be in denial, then there's only so much I can be bothered to say to you.

I welcome healthy scepticism, but not anti-science denials.



You're gonna add me to your ignore list... and I'm supposed to what... care?? Muuu... muuuhaha... muuuuhahahahahahaha! Who gives a damn if you want to run and hide behind ignore! A blog site is totally and completely ridiculous to use as rebuttal to anything! You are the one who should be embarrassed, but the silly truth is… either, you know your argument is so weak, or don't have the character to know you're supposed to be embarrassed… So ignore away! I will still rip apart all your nonsense and I don’t care if you see what I write or not... good news is… others will and I will be free to post whatever I want while I laugh my buttocks off!


Have a nice day!


--Charles Marcello


[edit on 6-12-2009 by littlebunny]



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 10:57 AM
link   
reply to post by littlebunny
 


See you then! I do hope it blocks your threads as well, because after a quick scan of them - they don't half sound like complete gibberish, much like your posts here.



[edit on 6-12-2009 by john124]



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 11:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by john124
See you then.




Here let me pull a john124 seeing how blog sites now pose as real science rebuttals...

Let Finish this, numbers don't lie



Originally posted by TheRedneck
Thanks to buddhasystem, I have decided to finish some calculations I started some time back. I am posting them here. The following will be used:
  • Due to charcter limitations, I will be avoiding the use of exponential expressions. I apologize for any difficulty this may cause; it causes me difficulty as well, but is an inherent weakness in the font systems used on the Internet and tends to cause confusion itself when used.
  • All values are given in metric units. The abbreviations used are:
    • m = meter
    • cm = centimeter (0.01m)
    • km = kilometer (1000m)
    • g = gram
    • kg = kilogram (1000g)
    • J = Joule
    • kJ = kiloJoule (1000J)
    • W = Watt
    • s = second
    • °K = degree Kelvin
    Calculations, due to the size of the values involved in planetary mechanics, will be based on the km/kg/kJ units. Other units are used for conversion of physical values.
  • The Kelvin temperature scale will be used. Remember that a degree Kelvim is equal to a degree Celsius; the two are interchangable for purposes of temperature variance.
  • All sources will, of course, be linked. This will, however, be done through the use of footnotes at the end and reference numbers, rather than by links embedded throughout the text, in order to keep the calculations themselves as uncluttered as possible.


It has been theorized that the use of antropogenic (man-made) carbon dioxide is the reason for the recently observed warming trend from ca. 1960-1998. The present level of CO2 in the troposphere is stated by multiple sources as being on the order of 380 ppmv[1] or 0.038% of the atmosphere. This represents an increase, based on the most liberal estimates I have uncovered for pre-industrial levels of 280 ppmv[2], of 100 ppmv or 0.01%. Since this base point is considered to be 'safe and natural', it would logically follow that any warming would have to be associated with the 0.01% increase and it alone.

All heat energy reaching the earth is from the sun, in the form of solar irradiance. Heatb reflected back into space is a result of this solar irradiance, and can therefore be considered the same in energy calculations. Solar irradiance can and has been quantified. The amount of energy reaching the planet is on the order of 1366 W/m²[3]. The planet presents a more or less circular profile to the sun, so the area of the earth normal to solar irradiance can be calculated as this circle. The earth is an average of 6371 km[4], with a troposhere layer surrounding it that averages 17km in height[5], which also must be included since it is the location of the atmospheric carbon dioxide. That means a circular area of

r = 6371 + 17 = 6388 km

A = π r² = π (6388)² = 128,197,539 km²


We can now calculate the amount of energy which is thus intercepted by the earth (including the troposphere):

1366 W/m² = 1,366,000,000 W/km²

1,366,000,000 W/km² · 128,197,539 km² = 175,117,838,274,000,000 W (equivalent to J/s)

175,117,838,274,000,000 J/s = 175,117,838,274,000 kJ/s


That result in in Joules (or kiloJoules) per second. Since most climate predictions are based on much longer time intervals, I will now calculate how much energy would be available during such a longer time interval such as the commonly used 100-yr. period:

100 yr = 36,525 days = 876,600 hr. = 52,596,000 minutes = 3,155,760,000 s


We can now multiply this time interval by the rate of energy influx to obtain the total energy that the planet will recieve from solar irradiation over the next 100 years:

175,117,838,274,000 kJ/s · 3,155,760,000 s/100yr =
552,629,869,311,558,240,000,000 kJ/100yr


Now we must calculate exactly how much of that energy will be affected by the increase in the amount of carbon dioxide in the troposphere. Remembering that the increase from pre-industrial levels is 0.01% of total atmospheric volume, we multiple this total energy by 0.0001:

552,629,869,311,558,240,000,000 kJ/100yr · 0.0001 =
55,262,986,931,155,824,000 kJ/100yr intercepted by anthropogenic CO2


Now let us turn to the question of how much energy is needed to increase global temperatures. Of course, the first and most obvious area to be heated is the troposphere itself. Air under average atmospheric conditions has a specific heat capacity of 1.012 J/g·°K[6] and an average density of 1.2 kg/m³[7]. The troposphere itself can be calculated by using the information presented earlier (average radius of earth = 6371 km[4] and a troposhere extending 17 km above the surface[5]). Thus the area of the troposphere can be determined by calculating the volume of a sphere of 6388 km radius and subtracting a sphere of 6371 km radius from it:

V(tot) = 4/3 π r³ = 4/3 π · 6388³ = 1,091,901,171 km³

V(earth) = 4/3 π r³ = 4/3 π · 6371³ = 1,083,206,917 km³

V = V(tot) - V(earth) = 1,091,901,171 km³ - 1,083,206,917 km³
= 8,694,154 km³


Now we can calculate how much energy it would require to raise the temperature of the troposphere by a single degree Kelvin:
[align=center]1.012 J/g·°K = 1.012 kJ/kg·°K

1.012 kJ/kg·°K · 1.2 kg/m³ = 1.2144 kJ/m³·°K

1.2144 kJ/m³·°K = 1,214,400,000 kJ/km³·°K


Since our calculations are based on a single degree Kelvin temperature rise, we can write this as
1,214,400,000 kJ/km³



I would post the whole thing but I would hope my point is made...


Have a nice day!


--Charles Marcello

[edit on 6-12-2009 by littlebunny]



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 11:03 AM
link   
reply to post by john124
 


TO LITTLEBUNNY

I am afraid I'll have to agree with this last fellow John.
No I am not invested in green stocks. I am invested in survival of the species and protecting the atmosphere of our earth. After all, this is the only atmosphere we have.

For a little bunny you sure are antagonistic but then I have a little bunny and he has an awful nasty temper too. On him it is cute though

I read your pages on google and you sound like a decent enough guy though perhaps a little deluded. I am curious however...you say you battle bullies in defense of others. Have you seen this?
www.wanttoknow.info...
and who could need your protection and battling big mouth more than children, orphans, being ritualistically sacrificed by the filthy and rich BECAUSE THEY CAN
It connects to this post and nearly all others on the site because THIS IS YOUR NEW WORLD ORDER. THESE ARE THE CRIMINALS AND YOU CAN CATCH THEM WITH BLOOD ON THEIR HANDS.
Re-direct your efforts. Save these children, if you don't care about letting them breathe clean air in the future maybe you can have a hand in protecting their lives now?




[edit on 6-12-2009 by rusethorcain]



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 11:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by rusethorcain
reply to post by john124
 


I am afraid I'll have to agree with this last fellow John, littlebunny.
No I am not invested in green stocks. I am invested in survival of the species and protecting the atmosphere of our earth. After all, this is the only atmosphere we have.

For a little bunny you sure are antagonistic but then I have a little bunny and he has an awful nasty temper too. On him it is cute though,



I am not against protecting our planet, to even suggest such a thing is completely and totally absurd... That's like me saying... rusethorcain wants to kill all Republicans and everyone over 20 because they don't agree man is the cause of global warming.


I believe people should protect their local environments, and I believe we should do all we can to keep our entire planet clean. But to pass laws and force people to live a certain way… based off of science that hasn't even remotely started finding out what the truth is yet… is pure EVIL! And I am totally against that kind of stupidity and I will not live under tyranny of any sort.... Remember the road to Hell is paved in gold from good intentions.... I want solid science, solid proof... It does not exist yet, period!


Oh... And this is a blog site, nothing we say here is going to change the world today or tomorrow... the only thing we can dare to hope for is… we help people start their own journey of truth. So don't take things so seriously, I know I don't... The internet is game of words, learn to enjoy it... Remember having an argument on the Internet is a lot like competing in the special Olympics... even if you win you're still retarded!


--Charles Marcello



[edit on 6-12-2009 by littlebunny]



new topics

top topics



 
105
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join