It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The only people he would suggest leave would be illegal immigrants and those of immigrant background who'd rather not adopt British values.
And no, the BNP would not discriminate on the grounds of 'race', only ancestry. And even then, the only discrimination would be in terms of who belongs to the indigenous ethnic group.
No-one would dare tell Native Americans they can't decide who is one of them and who is not. No-one would call them racist
. And no non-indigenous person in Britain who is willing to adopt Britain's values would be treated any differently in terms of law or decency.
Originally posted by john124
Or maybe like me, they don't want a fascist to gain too many seats.
Originally posted by rusethorcain
Scientist’s Himalayan mission provides unwelcome proof: glaciers are dying
This is from the UK Times Online and I think is pretty damning evidence in support of man made global warming. Check it out unless you have already made up your mind it isn't happening or even caused by man...then I can't help you.
[edit on 7-12-2009 by rusethorcain]
As for your repeated mention of 'there's no-one indigenous'... why would it be necessary to ascertain who is and isn't?
Almost everybody knows what their ethnic background is instinctively,
and a few foreign ancestors is not going to undo the overwhelming number of English, Welsh, Scots or Irish ones.
This talk of deporting non-whites is nonsense
It's offensive to both ask what British culture is and what an indigenous Briton is.
I've gone through that in detail various times before.
I realise now that to even answer these questions gives credence to an essentially offensive accusation which only ever seems to be reserved for Europeans and the British groups.
Originally posted by dankgun
2012 and the antichrist
It all boils down to two things;
Do you trust the Maya
or do you trust the Messiah.
Do you believe in December 2012
or do you believe in Revelation 20:12
Originally posted by john124No, because it's scientific to say that the inhabitents of eastern europe travelled across europe into Britain during the ice-age before the ice melted, and therefore they adapted to their environment slowly over time. So I'm saying:
The original habitants were probably very much different than the white British person.
But whatever they looked like is irrelevant, because it's where they travelled from that is the more relevant to determine an indigenous race, which is of course an eastern european descent.
These weren't in the same speech. One day he picks on one group, the next it's another. And later on, he retracts. That's where the inconsistency lies and makes it unequal.
[edit on 7-12-2009 by john124]
Originally posted by Cythraul
reply to post by john124
I don't even know where to begin correcting you there. I've had enough debates on ethnicity and identity to know that we'll go round and round without achieving anything. I'd rather not sit and take personal insults and I'm not going to sink to your level either, so I'm out.
Originally posted by john124
Of course. Griffin hasn't changed though.
Let's try not to change from my original point: that was that Griffin would not know who to deport, as it's not possible to determine who is indigenous to Britain. But of course he'll have his own personal guideline to determine that, which makes no sense to any rational person.
Perhaps you should read and understand what I actually said - which is that the BNP cannot determine who is indigenous to Britain.
And that's when they're not getting drunk, behaving like childish thugs, and thinking about killing Obama, and in their drunken haze stupidly confusing the difference between a golliwog doll and a person. You are in for a rude awakening if you think this bunch of half-wits are going to do anything good for Britain.
maybe like me, they don't want a fascist to gain too many seats.
The BNP are always going to gain seats in places in Northern England, where a significant number of people are racist thugs in those particular constituencies. Most people see the BNP for what they are, and the more publicity they get, the less that the more intellegent people will vote for them.
If the BNP ever become more popular, it will only be because the current trash inside the BNP has been replaced by a more educated section of society from all ethnic groups. Then it won't be racist, because the people in it won't be racist. So I will welcome that - when we can wave goodbye and good riddance to trash like Griffin.
A false comparison because Griffin has not had the same level of power. Also I do not have to like either of those people - disliking one does not mean I like the other. Someone can have had enough of mainstream, but still find the BNP completely distasteful.
Is that after they've got pissed-up, and shot a few golliwogs with a paintball gun!
Imagine what the Jews would say if the Global political elite said that Israel had to be multicultural and more diverse,
I've had enough debates on ethnicity and identity to know that we'll go round and round without achieving anything. I'd rather not sit and take personal insults and I'm not going to sink to your level either, so I'm out.
Absolutely 1st class sir...
I have been reading your posts in this thread and I believe I share alot of the same views as you.
All the way down to your last post, Why should we bother arguing with people who just ignore all of the points we make and reply with non sensical rhetoric.