Al Gore's OSCAR award, TAKEN BACK ??? cause climategate (AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH)

I dont know...I think he deserves the award even more now for the amazing acting job he did to push the global warming hoax

reply to post by ProfEmeritus


Lol, I never read the T &C or whatever, much less PROMISE to agree to it, there like end user license agreements. I just click click click past them
Peace

[edit on 5-12-2009 by Mentaltraveler]

Originally posted by jimmyx

Originally posted by kaskade
reply to post by fumanchu

 

here's a bit of science....burning requires oxygen, which we, as humans, need to live...burning produces CO2, which we, being human, will kill us.

I just had to quote this drivel. Yes, if you were to breathe pure CO2 until your body ran out of oxygen, you would die. If CO2 was poisonous to breathe, you would be DEAD right now.

Here is a thread for you to check out-The Church of Climatology

Originally posted by audas
I have had an open challenge on above top secret for almost a year - if anyone can provide evidence of a scientist with a theory and published paper which disproves AGW then please post a link - until such a time the overwhelming evidence to support the fact of AGW stands.

Have been looking forward to someone providing some evidence disproving it - and this has never ever been done.

Look forward to seeing the link.

Here you go mate, the report issued by the NIPCC, which is quite meticulously refuting the reportings of the IPCC. It's not just one scientist and not just one theory, but a quite detailed report on all of the distortions of the IPCC- which is why it amounts to over 800 pages. And please stop your false rhetoric about the "consensus" on AGW, because there is none.

So It's a hoax that pumping out tons of poisonous CO2 and CFC's into the atmosphere, causing massive wildlife extinction, and destroying the Earth's ecosystem, isn't harmful to us and should be ignored?

CO2 is not poisonous. Illiteracy is the reason these scam artists get away with this nonsense. This is all about politics and money in THIER pockets and billions in research money for phony scientists.

In fact all life on earth would cease without CO2. Plant love it and flourish in it. Greenhouses enrich it in fact for better growth and a better product.

The reason they made up the CO2 myth is they know most of the population is so illiterate they can just make crap up. It is the hundred million that Gore made he was after. That is documented. If Cap and
Trade passes he instantly makes a billion. Would you lie for a billion dollars, or the hundred million he already made?

His house uses the same electricity in a month a that twenty normal houses use in a year. He commutes in a private jet while telling all of us to ride bicycles to work. Why do you believe him knowing all of that?

Laying climate change aside, Gore is a scam artist and a piece of human waste.

Google a aerial view of his house. That house will cause the production of more CO2 in one year than an ordinary person is responsible for in their entire lifetime. If you believed in your cause, you would hate Gore. If you support Gore, your not an environmentalist, your a groupie or you have been bought by him.

Any environmentalist who does not hate Gore is a phony who does not believe any of what they say. They are just control freaks and nut cases.

I respect real environmentalist but Gore and Goldman Sachs who own the companies that will make billions from Cap and Trade are criminals and creeps. Want my respect, tell the truth about Gore. Otherwise?

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/be0f2db14925.jpg[/atsimg]

Poor little guy - has to live in a this tiny house. He did put in a few fluorescent bulbs though. Probably lowered his energy use by .0000000000000000000000001%. I guess he's enjoying jetting around Europe on a mostly empty private jet right now, telling other people how wrong it is to waste energy and promoting Cap and Trade. He needs that billion to buy fuel and his own 747 I guess.

reply to post by Blaine91555


I cannot agree with you more Gore loses all credibility with me personally because he doesnt "practise what he preaches". i have a very hard time believing that he's trying to help make a positive change in the world regarding the climate. he uses a private jet, and lives in a home that looks like that! he's not interested in fixing the environment. he's interested in the all mighty dollar.

Living in a cave using fire for heat and hunting your own food won't promote awareness. A private jet is a great means of quick transportation. He's a busy guy, or should he ride a blimp? Why does everyone seem to personally hate this guy? I thought it was logical thinking that the more the environment is destroyed, the more adverse the affect would be on us. It's not just CO2 levels, it's overfishing, coral reef destruction resulting in dead zones, destruction of the Amazon which accounts for 20 percent of the world's oxygen, etc. I don't hug trees, but ecology of the planet does have a balance. Remember the major 5 extinctions in the past? We maybe causing the latest event as well.

reply to post by devilishlyangelic23


He was only worth a million when he left office. He is now worth a hundred million. No honest person could do that while supporting his lifestyle.

I want a clean environment just like everyone else does. Too bad these confidence people and politicians have taken over science. We won't be able to trust science any longer as long as there are billions in research money at stake. Science is now a branch of government controlled through grants. We are about to go through a modern version of the dark ages and I don't mean lack of light.

reply to post by AngelHeart


If you continue to apologize for people as clearly corrupt as Gore, you will loose all credibility.

Only a real scumbag demands behavior from others they are unwilling to follow themselves. I don't give a damn if he lives in a nice house where he can sleep in a different room every day for month. I do care about his phony crap.

Destroy the whole worlds economy so he and GS can make billions based on mistruths and politically motivated junk science?

If anyone gave a damn, like they pretend too, they would have demanded we start building nuclear plants. This is about money, not the environment. It's sad how many they have tricked. It's sad young people are being brainwashed by cads. It sucks that politics has destroyed our Universities.

China and India are the real issue now. We keep doing better and better, they are just starting. They have publically stated they won't sign on to Cap and Trade, so even if it were true and it is not, it would do no good. Why is it environmentalist activists NEVER say anything about China and India? Phonies!!!!

First of all, let me state I only read most of the first page. That being said, was this some sort of experiment kaskade? One devised to see if people read something in its entirety before commenting. We have people reading it with an angle to dismiss, yet they are using that angle as a tool against summary judgment. You know, people too quickly judged your post. These people used it to comment on how you were too quick to judge Al Gore. Priceless. The cosmic joker is one funny bastard. Does everybody not see how using the same tool against a tool of the same making does not work. Scizzors ties scizzors. It is a stalemate and perpetuation of the same crap. At least the drama spins faster, revealing the author, so we can rejct this dufus.

i highly doubt he'll get his oscar pulled. that being said i was a believer in global climate change (caused mainly by humans) till last week when those emails came out. not anymore though. obviously i won't be buying a gas guzzler or waste more food/resources now that i know it's all a hoax. i mean i'd still have to pay for the extra gas or electricity or other resources that would be wasted! so yeah i'd still do my best to have the most efficient home i can afford as long as the improvements don't exceed the savings of energy costs that i'd pay without them.

as for those extinctions that happened in the past - they just show us that 95% of life on earth that ever existed died due to various causes. so i wouldn't be surprised if we're entering another global extinction cycle - albeit somewhat helped by us humans.

and as always let's remember the earth doesn't give a crap about us and it does not need to be saved - it's been here billions of years and will outlive us by billions. it's humans that need to save themselves! so we'd better be sure that we're doing the right thing...

Originally posted by AngelHeart
Living in a cave using fire for heat and hunting your own food won't promote awareness. A private jet is a great means of quick transportation. He's a busy guy, or should he ride a blimp? Why does everyone seem to personally hate this guy? I thought it was logical thinking that the more the environment is destroyed, the more adverse the affect would be on us. It's not just CO2 levels, it's overfishing, coral reef destruction resulting in dead zones, destruction of the Amazon which accounts for 20 percent of the world's oxygen, etc. I don't hug trees, but ecology of the planet does have a balance. Remember the major 5 extinctions in the past? We maybe causing the latest event as well.

Would you consider that Gore may have hijacked the environmental movement to earn billions instead of being selfless and work to save the environment without charging everyone a service fee? A service fee that won't go back into assistance for the environment. Just consider that.

[edit on 6-12-2009 by thepixelpusher]

reply to post by ProfEmeritus


No offense to ATS and all the lovely admins and members who keep this forum alive, but, *ahem*, F**K THE RULES. Fervent adherence to guidelines often leads to pointless witch hunts and wasted energy. So what if the post is mislabeled? Do you not see the significance of the content? Or do you wish to draw attention away from the content? Were you a hall monitor as a child? Did you tell the teacher when the other kids took candy from her desk when she was out of the room? Do you actually have a mortarboard handy, and do you look at yourself wearing it in the mirror?
Ha, no bad feelings, man. The teachers pet thing stood out to me, and instead of calling people names and trying to be mean, I ask various questions. Not to defame personalities, it's just because I like to jest instead of roast when I see seemingly misplaced indignance.
You must admit, your overlooking of the content in lieu of the "violation" this idolater and philistine committed by posting an offensively off topic thread deserves critical attention not unlike a painful sore in the nethers .
Man-made climate change dismantling is too important to dismiss so you can nitpick at nitwit posters. Thats my two cents, anyway.

Al gore is fake and a fraud always has been always will be ... back to when his daddy tried to stop civil rights , when Al himself helped sell missile secrets to China... heres more about AL Gore

Al Gore Climategate

Since you feel so passionate about the truth and that Al Gore's emmy should be revoked...

Maybe we can take a moment to review the veracity of your OP?

Originally posted by kaskade
Im sure we've all heard of Al Gores' movie "AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH", and all the controversy surrounding it. It being banned in schools,

Banned in schools? The first departure from the truth in your OP...Line 1…not a good start for an OP attempting to show someone as dishonest.

I am sure you will appreciate my clarifying this for you since you are so passionate about honesty.

In the UK there was a suit filed to ban the film from schools, but it was unsuccessful. The FILM WAS NOT BANNED...Ditto with Federal Way Schools in Seattle...NOT BANNED...those two are the most successful of the GW Denial Movement since the resultant rulings required that the film must be accompanied by critical discussion about how much of the science presented was proven.

Him being sued by 31,000 Scientist,

You are referring to the "Oregon Petition" funded by the "Oregon Institute for Science and Medicine", an institute that consists of a few guys in Oregon who previously made their money selling home schooling packages to protect children from "Socialist values". It's headed up by Arthur Robinson.

Long story short, he created a "scientific paper" and mocked it up to appear as a "peer reviewed" study by the National Academy of Sciences when in reality he wrote it himself and the National Academy of Scientists publically and loudly declared the paper a fraud and a forgery.

The “Science” in the paper was so faulty that nearly every Scientist who read it dismissed it. So Robinson put the “Survey” online…for years and didn't verify whether respondents were scientists at all

...and yet people still make statements like "31,000 scientists are suing Al Gore"

NO...there is NO LAWSUIT and among those that signed the "oregon Petititon" that

Hawkeye Pierce
Ginger Spice
Michael J Fox
Michael Moore LOL

And many more

Robinson was forced to publically acknowledge that "little attempt was made to verify the credentials of those that responded."...or signed his "online" petition.

No Lawsuit..No verification of whether online respondants over a period of years were actually scientists…forged science paper..

How did you arrive at 31,000 scientists are suing Al Gore? Honesty…..

Him being protested and shot down everywhere he goes,

Unsure how being protested by some people speaks to the validity of his arguments? A strange standard to apply to "truth".

And now in wake of climate gate we finally have a dealt our final blow to his reputation, and his global warming lie.

Global Warming is a lie? and it is "his" lie?...the overwhelming majority of climatologists might be confused by both of these claims...well maybe not "Ginger Spice".

He is finally being stripped of his Emmy, because of "false" information being used in the movie. [edit on Fri Dec 4 2009 by DontTreadOnMe]

Stripped of his Emmy? Well...No, he isn’t. A couple of Hollywood types who lean conservative “apparentl”y want that to happen, but how do you bridge the gap to your claim above "He is finally being stripped of his Emmy"?...

by the same standard of truth that you apply to the rest of you OP?

What is true in this OP?
What is there here that doesn't crumble upon the slightest examination?

This OP is an irony...Call one man a liar and support your claim with a succession of easily disproved lies and well known false claims.

Edit to add: THere is a lot of discussion about Al Gore's "character", how much he makes etc. etc....personally I think he has all the charisma of a turtle. I just don't understand what that has to do with science, facts or whether you believe GW is real or not?

[edit on 7-12-2009 by maybereal11]

[edit on 7-12-2009 by maybereal11]

reply to post by mrsoul2009

Boy are you wrong! YES, there is a change in climate, and a change in weather. NO the temps are not rising, they are falling! NO they are not man made! That is the height of arrogance to think that puny man could have any effect on this big hunk of dirt. I'll bet you have never travelled, never been in a plane...Gives one a whole new perspective. Like I have heard does orbiting the planet. These changes have been occuring on a regular basis for all of history, and before that. It is affected by SOLAR weather, and how are we influencing that? Too much dancing? I think it is from our twin star, Nemesis, coming around again. And it will get much worse and result in TEOLAWKI. Want a playbook, or script? Try the book of Revelation, last book in the Bible. It talks about a meteorite named Wormwood, calls it a star the size of a mountain that will fall into the sea. I think debris in the wake of Nemesis on its appointed rounds. Oh, and it also says that Iran will get fried, and the Jews will rebuild the temple where the Dome of the Rock is. Now how will they do that, I wonder? I have my ideas...

Come on guys he was being super cereal^_^...i knew it wasnt anywhere near as bad as people say. If there is any its part of earths natural cycles. As previousley mentioned at least he still has Manbearpig