Just wrote a philosopher paper just two nights ago on what is happiness and the state of it. Are we talking about the various faiths' coming to an
agreement of some sorts or more or less all the faiths' just adopting to one belief? Also it would depend on what sort of agreement it does turn out
to be, because one false step on an others toes will lead to a war amongst the table.
I'd say having faith is fine, I currently don't belong to one; but the majority of my friends do and I get along with them. It's when others seem
to take it a step to far is when it becomes the problem. That's the only thing I can see, even if they are united what of the ones who still take it
to far? They could easily start a problem just the same as they do now ( if one can deem it a problem some may not, but I do. )
The short of the matter is overall I suppose is the higher ups of religions would be fine and dandy rules maybe changed and such; but their are still
extremist to worry about and it would be as if nothing had ever changed because they in a sense would still exist to cause turmoil for someone else.
Though maybe I misinterpreted the post entirely I'm still not 100% used to ATS yet