It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Zsaqulz78th
Well, their right. That is a waste of money, from a defense standpoint.
Your not going to find aliens, looking at moving lights and spots in the sky. Even if you see a UFO, how is it going to explain anything about aliens?
Originally posted by ufo reality
Originally posted by Zsaqulz78th
Well, their right. That is a waste of money, from a defense standpoint.
Your not going to find aliens, looking at moving lights and spots in the sky. Even if you see a UFO, how is it going to explain anything about aliens?
Um....some UFO sightings are just "lights" in the sky, but some are also solid objects up to a mile wide. And when an object is tracked on radar going from a hover to 3,000 mph in a split second, I doubt that's "ours". But to the MOD and DOD it's "nothing".
The majority of the general public (including you) and the media buy it, so the beat goes on.
As for the Roswell incident, nearly two-thirds of the respondents to the poll said they believed that a UFO crash-landed in a field outside the New Mexico
Probing a more universal measure of knowledge, Gallup also asked the following basic science question, which has been used to indicate the level of public knowledge in two European countries in recent years: "As far as you know, does the earth revolve around the sun or does the sun revolve around the earth?"
Great Britain that same year, 67% answered correctly
Originally posted by ufo reality
The MOD should watch this before they say there's nothing to UFOs and no defense concern:
www.youtube.com...
www.youtube.com...
[edit on 5-12-2009 by ufo reality]
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
That is an interesting approach that reminds me of Spock's quote in Star Trek:
www.imdb.com...
"when you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."
So if we have a given sighting and say it's impossible to be a known manmade craft, impossible to be psychological, impossible to be geophysical, etc then what is left?
The Lakenheath Incident (1956)
The Coyne Incident
The Tehran Incident
The RB-47 Incident
The Redmond Oregon Incident
The Colares Incident
The Portage County Incident
The Alaska Flight 1628 Incident
The Exeter Puzzle Incident
The Washington Merry go round
The Chiles-Whitted Incident
The Gosford Incident
The Westhall UFO Incident
The Bariloche UFO Incident
The B-29 UFO Encounter (1952)
The Ellsworth AFB Incident (1953)
The Bethune case (1951)
The West Lothian Incident (1979)
Originally posted by SquirrelNutz
Thanks for posting the Nick Pope / MOD stuff - fascinating.
Originally posted by ukmadmax
So why is anyone who lives in the UK ( like me) surprised ?
"The official line from the Ministry of Defense is, 'Yes, this happened. No, we don't know what it is, but we say that it is of no defense significance.' How can it possibly be of no defense significance when your best jet is left for standing by a UFO? And, again, how can it be of no defense significance when your air defense region is routinely penetrated by structured craft?"
Nick Pope
Head of the "UFO desk" at Air Secretariat 2-A, British Ministry of Defence from 1991-1994
Originally posted by Faiol
lol maybe they did get their answers and maybe they dont need to investigate anymore that doesnt mean nothing is happenning
"The first point to make is that there is no 'UFO Project'. Handling of UFO sightings is a very small element of our work."