It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by endisnighe
reply to post by rhinoceros
Just one question. One. How did the last ice age end?
[edit on 12/4/2009 by endisnighe]
I could maybe agree, if it wasn't for the fact that the observed warming is 10^something faster than ever before in the history of our planet.
Then there's the other inconvenient truth that us humans started pumping massive amounts of CO2 to our atmosphere when this rapid never before seen warming started. What else.. oh yeah basic understanding of greenhouse effect and greenhouse gases
Originally posted by TheRedneck
Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas in that it will absorb three narrow bands in the IR spectrum, these being approximately 2.7, 4.5, and 15 microns if I am not mistaken. The bandwidth of these appear to be less than half a micron, although exact data seems to be well-buried amidst the cries of gloom and doom. That covers a very small portion of the total IR spectrum.
The drastic increase you mention is 100 ppmv (380 ppmv - 280 ppmv) over a period of from 30-50 years (depending on who you ask). 100 ppmv is 0.01% of the total volume of the atmosphere. That means if your home is around 2000 square feet, you've got an extra 0.0316 ounce of carbon dioxide in the entire house. If we keep increasing the concentration at the same rate (assuming the 30 year timespan), you will will have a whole ounce of extra carbon dioxide in that home in 960 years... in the year 2969.
Yeah, that's drastic...
Somebody is bound to say that so what if concentration of CO2 increases like a 100 parts per million. It's so little.
Well guess what, when we released CFCs to the atmosphere the amounts were like 10^15-20 smaller, yet the effects were freaking HUGE.
Originally posted by Toecutter.
reply to post by rhinoceros
I am 40+ as well. I remember the Global Cooling debacle.
Or was it ?
Cheers
Originally posted by audas
I have an open challenge to anyone who can provide a link to a published scientific evidence which disproves AGW - a single link.
This challenge has never, ever been met. If it was met - there would be no debate - you would all be right in your ridiculous assumptions - cheers.
Edit to add-also besides corruption-people become sloth and ignorant, ask 100 people about anything in the DI or Constitution and hell, I would be surprised if 2% could answer the simplest of questions. Of course, like you said this is intentional. We are supposed to be sovereign governors of this country, NOT FRACKING SERFS OR CORPORATE ENTITIES.