It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sos37
This also makes another important point to those who call the Iraq/Afghanistan wars totally Bush's doing - it wasn't. And this is the proof. With Clinton's answer we now know that she favored pre-emptive strikes in Afghanistan and most likely Iraq.
Remember, the president at the time had a majority support from Congress to go to war in Iraq and then in Afghanistan.
Originally posted by HankMcCoy
Ron Paul is a trainwreck and a nutter. How do I know this? Because ATS is in love with him, and ATS only falls in love with nutters.
Originally posted by HankMcCoy
Ron Paul is a trainwreck and a nutter. How do I know this? Because ATS is in love with him, and ATS only falls in love with nutters.
Originally posted by joey_hv
Am I confused or did I just watch that video and see Hillary totally PWN Ron Paul???
Originally posted by OpTiMuS_PrImE
Originally posted by HankMcCoy
Ron Paul is a trainwreck and a nutter. How do I know this? Because ATS is in love with him, and ATS only falls in love with nutters.
That's a pretty sad outlook you have there. Glad you classify everyone on this site as a NUT, so i'm guessing your including yourself in that statement too, judging by your statement i think you classify
and ATS only falls in love with nutters.
While I am not going to argue with the fact that I think a disproptionately high percentage of this website suffers from acute mental abnormalities
Originally posted by misterhype
reply to post by IIGuns
that's a shame. that's just Dubya's "no compromise" approach in action. that also just goes to support the theories that bin laden had nothing to do with it and it was an inside job because if he would have gotten bin laden he would have been hailed by America as the best president in years.
Originally posted by HankMcCoy
Who does ATS love that isn't labeled a 'nut'? No one. Why? Because if the person was accepted by the mainstream, he wouldn't be counter-culture enough for the likes of the conspiracy community.
By nature of this website, the community here gravitates toward people routinely labeled as nuts.