Martian "Square Cave Opening" a pyramid shadow!

The tiny little Martians toiled 20 years to build that monolithic tiny pyramid! Phage should show some respect and shut his gob!

Imagine how long the face must have taken!
Dedicated little guys.

The question remains if it happens to be a natural formed piramide or
it is a "intelligent" made item.
As on earth there are always other interesting items in the vicinity.
I had a look at google earth-mars and found something even more interesting at a distance of 50.6 meters bearing 284.23 degrees.
a triangle shaped opject on a stick casting a long shadow.

Originally posted by Phage
Imagine how long the face must have taken!
Dedicated little guys.

That's funny.
But to answer your question, I'm not saying it's not there, I'm just saying its possible it may not be what you think it is. If our government (including NASA) would lie to us about one thing, then you really can't believe anything that comes out of their mouth.
I also find it interesting that you bring up the face. I saw a video a while back ago (don't remember what it was called at the moment) but its show the "updated" picture of the face that NASA released. It then showed them take a 3D image if the picture and they changed the angle and low and behold the face image returned. There is also a second face on mars I previously knew nothing about that is more prominent.



The image has been colored in but you get the idea.
Yes, I realize this came from NASA, and I said I don't believe the things they say but you can't edit every pic. They take millions and millions of pictures. They're gonna miss some things.

[edit on 2-12-2009 by The_Truth818]

reply to post by The_Truth818

Yeah, and they only miss the ones with the interesting bits.

reply to post by ArMaP



They're all interesting. That's why they airbrush them out. But like I said they can't get them all. Why would they edit something non-interesting?

[edit on 2-12-2009 by The_Truth818]

reply to post by The_Truth818


If they airbrush them all how do you know that they airbrush them?

Seriously, are they such a complete useless group of people that are not able to do such an easy task and also unable to use any kind of quality control?

Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by The_Truth818

 

If they airbrush them all how do you know that they airbrush them?

Seriously, are they such a complete useless group of people that are not able to do such an easy task and also unable to use any kind of quality control?

I use the term airbrush, but they go about doing this by different means of course. There are many, many, pictures that show pixelation where it shouldn't be. Thus showing that something was there, but it is now not. And again you can't get all the anomalies. This is an ENTIRE PLANET we're talking about. You're not going to find every single little thing that stands out. And I'm sure that there are at least a few people that don't agree with what the government is hiding and let a few things slide underneath the radar.

They are just human you know, they're not perfect, so yes they will make mistakes. If they didn't then how do you explain 9/11? (Unless of course you believe in the conspiracy behind that, but that's completely off topic.) Trying to cover-up anomalies on an entire planet is no easy task, especially with the millions of pictures that are taken.

Originally posted by The_Truth818
There are many, many, pictures that show pixelation where it shouldn't be.

Yes, and most, if not all, of those images are just bad copies of the original images.

Thus showing that something was there, but it is now not.

No, showing that there is some pixelation.

And again you can't get all the anomalies. This is an ENTIRE PLANET we're talking about. You're not going to find every single little thing that stands out.

Yes, it's an entire planet, but the photos are not that much, and if they want to find every little thing they just have to use more people.

And I'm sure that there are at least a few people that don't agree with what the government is hiding and let a few things slide underneath the radar.

In the company where I work we have only two levels of responsibility in our work, but that's enough to catch most errors. Do you think that if a government agency was trying to hide such important secrets they would let someone do the work without being checked at least once? And that they wouldn't rotate people to avoid creating a "team" of like-minded people?

They are just human you know, they're not perfect, so yes they will make mistakes.

Yes, they may make mistakes, but that's why things like that are not left to just one person, they should have at least one more controlling other people's work.

I imagine a work-flow like this:
1. First image analysis, to see if there is something that should be removed.
2. If anything was detected in phase 1 then another team removes it. The images are assigned to specific people, so they can know who changed what photos. Any suspicious behaviour (either on purpose or by bad professionalism) can be traced back to the source.
3. The altered images are re-analysed, preferably by two teams, the one that detected the things to be removed on phase 1 and another team to see if something was missed by the phase 1 team (people usually repeat the same mistakes when doing the same things). If anything was not detected on phase 1 then the image goes back to phase 2. If anything that was not there on phase 1 is there on phase 3 then it was added on phase 2, and the records will show who changed that image.

Trying to cover-up anomalies on an entire planet is no easy task, especially with the millions of pictures that are taken.

They may be many, but in a long time. HiRISE, for example (the source of these photos), published 11747 images during 3 years, just 10 images each day (although very large images), so they would not need a huge team of people doing that work.

Here is something that I found while looking at the photos on www.marsanomalyresearch.com...

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/2a62f6c74ec3.jpg[/atsimg]

If you look on the right in the red square you see what looks like a "snail", but on the left is the picture of the same rock and it is gone. Maybe thats it sitting on top, but it is definately not in the same place

I have gotten hooked at just looking at the pictures that are being sent back!

reply to post by spacecase7717

The two pictures were taken at the same time by two different cameras. The "snail" is a rock. In the picture on the left (which is actually from the right side camera) the rock is hidden behind the larger rock. It is a matter of point of view.

It's better to go to the source of the pictures than to Skipper. The rocks are in the upper right corner.
Left Camera
Right Camera

What does this have to do with pyramids?



[edit on 12/2/2009 by Phage]

I did go to the source and looked at all the pictures for that SOL. The object I have circled on the right is on the very tip of that rock and should be able to be seen from either camera. IMO.

P.S. It has nothing to do with a pyramid, it has to do with one of many Mars anomalies.

Originally posted by W3RLIED2
I'm pretty bad ar spotting anything worth while in satalite images. tThis is pretty awsome. I tried to highlight the lines of the main structure but I'm not too handy with paint.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/d0f5d925bf67.jpg[/atsimg]

I'm not sure how that could be much else other than a pyramid... I hope this gets major flags.

Good search, it could be the top of a pyramid that is buried under the sands. Of course if you go to:

www.s8int.com

You will see them among other things talk about the egyptians having aircraft of some type. We went from horse and buggy to the moon in 80 years, 80 years. But we say that those ancient people where able to build structures like the pyramids or puma punku and other places around the planet with such precision but couldn't figure out how to make combustion of some sort or even fly like a bird. Our history on this planet and possibly on other planets in this system is slowly coming out and eventually we will find out what our true history is as a people.

reply to post by spacecase7717

But both pictures were taken at exactly the same time. This is shown by the file name:

Characters,

3 to 11 Spacecraft clock
This is the number of seconds since January 1, 2000
at 11:58:55.816 UTC.

marsrover.nasa.gov...

Yes, there are lots of "anomalies" that's why it's probably better to discuss each one in a separate thread.


[edit on 12/2/2009 by Phage]

Originally posted by lee63
The shadow looks so perfect though.

I think that is what convinced Dr. Buchli that he was seeing something that wasn't there. If you google images and ask for "Egyptian pyramids from the air" you'll see some black 'n' white photos approximating the Mars photo, but not 100%.

Originally posted by Nathwa
Indeed, my observations of numerous posts have led me to believe that those folks who take most things with a grain of salt, or prefer a very rational, tangible approach to mysteries get harrassed alot, but such is the way of things. As far as gathering evidence, I am no specialist in graphics, so we need someone with experience to come check this out. In the meantime, I am going to say it is a pyramid, with the evidence being that it looks like one and the way it casts its shadow.

I didn't mean my post to start any kind of flaming and I said pyramid
'cause that's what it looks like to me. I do not find pyramids to be mysterious 'cause wind erosion has caused almost perfect natural pyramids to be created on earth. In a NASA lunar photograph I found a perfect-looking tri-sided pyramid. But we know there's no wind up there!

I had written to George Filer about my finding and he gave me the courtesy of a reply:
Dear Ed,

Thanks for your input. I think I see what you are referring to.

I’ll forward to Dr. Buchli.

Regards

George Filer

Originally posted by badmoviefan
Here we go again... Little to no evidence and tons of speculation. Waste of bandwidth but this is just my opinion.

The intent of the thread was for me to beat anyone else at posting the image and supporting the "cave opening" claim. I sort-of prevented that because you can imagine the flaming that would have resulted when others started to pipe in and accuse whoever the poster might have been with bad eyesight. This Dr Buchli jumped to conclusions which I didn't.

It was light debunking on my part.

reply to post by spacecase7717

Maybe this will show better the relative positions of all the objects in the scene.



I know that animations are a little irritating, but it's one of the best ways of showing a 3D scene on a screen.

reply to post by ArMaP


Your photographic skills are impressive. Do you think you can use them to produce a clearer image of the one I posted in the OP?