reply to post by Kurokage
Originally posted by Kurokage
Your understanding of science just beggers belief, you expect people to believe this rubbish, you're obviously just making this stuff up out of thin
air. You don't even have a basic grasp on the physics and you're trying to tell me that scientists don't have a clue, don't make me laugh. And
now you're telling us you were king Tut, I think it's maybe time for a trip to the Doc's my friend.
Kurokage, your avatar on the left says
"Deny Ignorance". Your post above does the opposite of denying ignorance.
Maggador does not expect people to believe and he mentioned this numerous times. How can you
ignore that he said to decide for yourself what to
believe and then, you accuse Maggador of making people "to expect to believe this rubbish"?
Kurokage, I politely ask you to please answer this question because, obviously, you do not want to deny ignorance.
Secondly, why do you believe that science has universal validity? Scientific concepts are merely mental constructs of our brain. We see sth. and
describe it but the scientific description can be very faulty.
For example: measuring an apple with a ruler is only as precise as the ruler permits. What about the distance between the smallest units of the ruler?
Do you just
believe it is valid to
ignore these infinitesimal distances between these "smallest units" and build a theory based on
rough measurement? In my opinion, science always puts mental constructs on top and on top and on top.....an initial approach which was justified by
belief and just not precise. Thus, the whole structure is flawed. The biggest flaw is that science ignores to believe in a creator.
Compare the attempt to describe the apple with a ruler to someone who paints a beautiful picture of the apple. Has the picture less validity of being
an appropriate description of the apple?
If we are inside a virtual reality - a small system - and this small system is bound to physical laws and these laws are working inside the small
system but are largely superceded by laws outside the small system, then, science inside the small system can have serious flaws.
Originally posted by Kurokage
Scientific thories are provable unlike living in fantasy worlds.
Originally posted by SpectreDC
To bad science requires these things to 1. be physical and 2. be repeatable.
SpectreDC, well put.
Believe in physicality and you get what you believe in or put in other words, physicality repeats itself. Believe in the spirit and you will get what
the spirit has to offer.
[edit on 26-1-2010 by decoder404]