NG threatening no bid in KC-X, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 1-12-2009 @ 07:40 PM by Zaphod58
reply to post by sourdiesel


This isn`t no bid like the AF is automatically giving the contract to NG, this is no bid like "we can`t win anyway so we aren`t going to offer our plane." They would withdraw freom the latest attempt to award the contract and probably protest it again.

As for the boom it`s going to be fly by camera and the boomer is going to be in the cockpit.



reply posted on 4-12-2009 @ 12:28 AM by FredT
reply to post by wingnut01



Close but NG/EADS AND Boeing pretty much both said before the chouice was made they would appeal, so had the 767 won NG/EADS would hav ebeen making noise.


reply posted on 5-12-2009 @ 02:25 PM by Zaphod58
reply to post by waynos


The problem here is that politicians are involved. The USAF wants the best plane. The RFP as was written in the draft (which is the problem) was written by the Undersecretary of Defense for Procurement. If they would let the AF choose their own plane and stop getting in the way, we`d already be building a new tanker.


reply posted on 21-10-2010 @ 12:36 PM by kilcoo316
Came across this earlier:

www.aviationweek.com.../asd/2010/10/20/02.xml&headline=Additional%20Fuel%20May%20Pay%20Off&channel=defense


Some extracts:



The Air Force is looking for more fuel offload compared to the smaller KC-135 tanker, but less than that carried by the larger KC-10, according to Grant. “The extra fuel on station [at long range] pays off” in the studies dealing with future warfare, she says. Operational burdens in future conflicts may be less because there will be fewer manned tactical aircraft to refuel, another result of tightening defense budgets. But they may be increased again by the need to service unmanned surveillance and strike aircraft from both the Navy and Air Force.

In addition, any work to add sensors to the tankers also will have to wait, she says. However, the extra time on station will make the joint surveillance and tanker mission more likely to be a success, Grant says. Moreover, the new tankers are designed with more electrical power, additional cooling and upgraded electronics to accommodate add-on sensors and make the tankers into information nodes.



*IF* true.... thats is a big help for the EADS-NA bid.

Wonder what Boeing would do if the decision went the other way (again).
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Amazing video of 747 lifting in place in extreme wind conditions
  Posted 1 days ago with 11 member flags
Eerie Second World War RAF fighter plane discovered in the Sahara
  Posted 16 days ago with 8 member flags
Stealth chopper based in Nevada
  Posted 16 days ago with 4 member flags
HIFiRE Scramjet Research Flight Will Advance Hypersonic Technology
  Posted 14 days ago with 2 member flags