Originally posted by Aeons
You can ignore reality. But it is all right there in front of you.
Pretending that you are being oppressed by having women be legally equal just makes you sound weak.
No dear, try legally advantaged in so many areas of the law. Custody, divorce, domestic altercations, employee conduct codes, sentencing for violent
crimes, parole rates, average incarceration times, government education subsidies and programs etc, etc,.
But its so cute that you think such legal inequalities makes you equal, its a perfect example of women's entitlement mentality.
Oh and your rather pathetic attempts to challenge my manhood is a textbook perfect example of women's go to tactic for emotional manipulation.
About 23 actually.
And you can look it up yourself. Men's cognitive development doesn't finish developing in some key areas until 23.
because I've seen studies that show that neither genders frontal cortex, which is used for, among other things, understanding the long term
consequences of actions, finishes developing until the early 20's; but no credible study I have ever seen has shown this to be a single gender issue.
And yes, if most of the wars on the planet have been fought by males between 15 and 25, but those same men's brains weren't fully cooked yet it sure
explains a lot.
Except most wars throughout history weren't started by those who fought it. I know logic is hard. But attempts at emotional manipulation is easy.
But maybe it took you significantly longer. 23 is probably an average. I can understand that for you personally it might have been thirty. I
understand that drinking too much tends to arrest people's cognitive development. That might explain it.
Challenging both my manhood and my intelligence, you're really pulling out all the stops. Shame you haven't actually bothered to think things
I suggest that the grown men with interest go look up the ages of the solidiers in the wars throughout history, and the ages of the terrorists now.
Alexander the Great's army was teenage boys. The average age of death a Roman, any class, was 25. The Roman solidier lived to 25. Maybe.
And challenging my maturity. Wow you really don't want anyone examining the lack of logic in your thesis do you. Then again, if I was making points
as ill thought out as you are, neither would I. What was the average age of Roman generals? Senators? You know,those who actually started the wars?
The world's violence has been, and is being fuelled by under educated teenagers and very young men. That is significant.
No, those young men are being used as tools. Old men have always sent young men to fight wars the young men didn't start. Many times, because some
old woman kept hectoring and manipulating the old man to "prove his manhood" and defend the honor of mother state/city, etc.
It says that MEN, grown men, shouldn't be letting boys who think that getting into fist fight at the bar is fun run the freaking world. That most of
the horrors you see don't lay at the feet of GROWN UPS. The world has been being run and defined by overgrown children.
What a shame your "theory" doesn't hold up to even the most basic critical analysis.
Let me guess, your next post will be another attempt to insult or challenge my manhood, intelligence, maturity, or other factor in the hope that my
hurt pride will blind me to the inanity of your arguments.