It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OldDragger
reply to post by 4nsicphd
Thanks VERY much for the update!
Big surprise! Another frivolous attempt to negate the vote goes down in flames. So now posters can start the paranoia fest about how Obama did this, our rights being taken away etc.
You can't deny ignorance to those that prefer ignorance.
The criminal charges of Eligibility Fraud and Treason (Barack Obama) and Conspiracy of Election Fraud (Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama) are now pending before these and numerous other Courts.
Originally posted by j2000
reply to post by 4nsicphd
Great! Got a link for that?
Originally posted by OldDragger
reply to post by j2000
And this has to do with frivolous lawsuits...how?
The subject of the OP was......?
So now posters can start the paranoia fest about how Obama did this, our rights being taken away etc.
Originally posted by OldDragger
reply to post by 4nsicphd
Thanks VERY much for the update!
Big surprise! Another frivolous attempt to negate the vote goes down in flames. So now posters can start the paranoia fest about how Obama did this, our rights being taken away etc.
You can't deny ignorance to those that prefer ignorance.
Originally posted by OldDragger
Yeah great.
More fake indictments from fake grand juries.
Want to wager that these will get as far as all the other goofball amateur
suits?
You know i worked in a Court for years, you can file just about anything, and believe me, I've seen some really crazy stuff.
Trouble is, cases are decided by law, a principle that few of you understand, and a Judge will just dismiss frivolous claims that are not supported by law. You don't just show up, argue your views and the judge or jury decides. You follow proceedure, follow the law, USE the law.
Sadly, too many of you just don't get it!
But your ignorance of the law and the courts doesn't stop you from bitching about something you know nothing about!
[edit on 1-12-2009 by OldDragger]
Indictment by Grand Jury
RIGHTS OF PERSONS
FIFTH AMENDMENT
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
INDICTMENT BY GRAND JURY
The history of the grand jury is rooted in the common and civil law, extending back to Athens, pre-Norman England, and the Assize of Clarendon promulgated by Henry II.1 The right seems to have been first mentioned in the colonies in the Charter of Liberties and Privileges of 1683, which was passed by the first assembly permitted to be elected in the colony of New York.2 Included from the first in Madison's introduced draft of the Bill of Rights, the provision elicited no recorded debate and no opposition. "The grand jury is an English institution, brought to this country by the early colonists and incorporated in the Constitution by the Founders. There is every reason to believe that our constitutional grand jury was intended to operate substantially like its English progenitor. The basic purpose of the English grand jury was to provide a fair method for instituting criminal proceedings against persons believed to have committed crimes. Grand jurors were selected from the body of the people and their work was not hampered by rigid procedural or evidential rules. In fact, grand jurors could act on their own knowledge and were free to make their presentments or indictments on such information as they deemed satisfactory. Despite its broad power to institute criminal proceedings the grand jury grew in popular favor with the years. It acquired an independence in England free from control by the Crown or judges. Its adoption in our Constitution as the sole method for preferring charges in serious criminal cases shows the high place it held as an instrument of justice. And in this country as in England of old the grand jury has convened as a body of laymen, free from technical rules, acting in secret, pledged to indict no one because of prejudice and to free no one because of special favor."3
Originally posted by OpTiMuS_PrImE
reply to post by OldDragger
The criminal charges of Eligibility Fraud and Treason (Barack Obama) and Conspiracy of Election Fraud (Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama) are now pending before these and numerous other Courts.
americangrandjury.org...
Originally posted by j2000
Originally posted by OldDragger
reply to post by 4nsicphd
Thanks VERY much for the update!
Big surprise! Another frivolous attempt to negate the vote goes down in flames. So now posters can start the paranoia fest about how Obama did this, our rights being taken away etc.
You can't deny ignorance to those that prefer ignorance.
Just curious, what state do you live in? Because if yours rights are not and have not declinded according to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights you claim to know so well, and your taxes are not rising, and your dollar is not tanking for the last 96 years, I and others most willingly would love to live there.
Originally posted by OldDragger
reply to post by j2000
Sigh.
The law is a framework of proceedure built upon the very thing many ATS'ers claim to revere the most, The Constitution. If the courts did not use an orderly, consistent set of rules and proceedures, they would be worthless, subject to the whims of each individual, changing constantly.
The job of the courts is to interpret and enforce ( through ruling ) the law, not to decide abstract philosophical arguments. Think about it, would you have it any other way?
Frequently, when, as in this deal, the courts ( Grand Jury), decide in a way that dissapoints people, those people accuse the system of corruption. ATS is full of these conspiratorial accusations. Usually the courts are simply doing what they were created to do, decide issues on the basis of law. Wild and dramatic claims are made here every day, usually by those that have little understanding of whereof the speak, and simply base their
gripes on emotion , predjudice and ill concieved rhetoric.
Catching on?
[edit on 1-12-2009 by OldDragger]
[edit on 1-12-2009 by OldDragger]
Originally posted by 4nsicphd
Originally posted by j2000
Originally posted by OldDragger
reply to post by 4nsicphd
While spelling and punctuation do not define a person, they do give a clue as to intellect.
.
I would say it is more likely evidence of educational quality within the "Public Schools". "Public School" is a misnomer. It should read "Government Schools". "Government Schools" are not interested in turning out bright educated sovereign citizens that have combined mental ability with education that would create a person capable of challenging their fiat currency pyramid scheme resulting in a nation of debt-slaves that can be controlled by changing the speed at which the printing press churns out federal reserve notes.
Ok, now that the topic has been thoroughly derailed...