It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


A new theory on the Atlantis prediction by Edgar Cayce

page: 1

log in


posted on Nov, 29 2009 @ 09:16 PM
It's always bothered me how accurate Edgar Casey's predictions were yet one of his most important predictions seems to be completely wrong

Atlantis Rising - Cayce most specifically timed forecast was that Atlantis would rise again in 1968 or 1969. Needless to say, Cayce was wrong on that count. [Note: However, it was in that time frame that the "Bimini Road" was located in the Atlantic Ocean. Whether this is a "road" or "natural, geologic erosion" is cannot be proven. Atlantis suffered 3 major destructions one of which was the deluge.

Well what if he was right?And I'm not talking about Bimini but rather someplace entirely different and what if Atlantis rose again but not from an ocean(Who said ocean?not Edgar) but from another depth?

Now what else could it arise from you ask? The answer is simple, ice it's the only other explanation.

Did you know that global warmiing is not a new theory?and before the current global warming fear there was global cooling fear (it started in about 1970)and before that it was global warming?Here is a general time line of the warming/cooling fears this is a list of articles from the N.Y. Times for the past 150 years on global warming and cooling.
This is the one that interests me

Expert Says Arctic Ocean Will Soon Be an Open Sea; Catastrophic Shifts in Climate Feared if Change Occurs Other Specialists See No Thinning of Polar Ice Cap February 20, 1969, Thursday By WALTER SULLIVAN Page 20, 1691 words DISPLAYING FIRST PARAGRAPH - Col. Bernt Balchen, polar explorer and flier, is circulating a paper among polar specialists proposing that the Arctic pack ice is thinning and that the ocean at the North Pole may become an open sea within a decade or two.

What made this highly respected col. come to that conclusion?

I have tried to locate the original article to no avail.Perhaps someone a little more computer savvy could find it or other articles that are related from that time period.

This thread is not to say I figured anything out but rather to take the investigation in a new and unexplored direction,any help would be appreciated.

posted on Nov, 29 2009 @ 10:19 PM
Thanks for the flags but I was hoping for a little

posted on Nov, 29 2009 @ 11:08 PM
I'm not sure I follow. so are you saying that Atlantis might be underwater beneath the arctic ice sheet?

of course the hollow earthers will tell you there is really a big hole leading into earth there already....

posted on Nov, 29 2009 @ 11:10 PM
reply to post by Totalstranger

No I'm suggesting Atlantis is not under water but under an ice sheet and it began to emerge from a melting ice sheet back in 1969

posted on Nov, 29 2009 @ 11:30 PM
I also think Atlantis could've been in Antarctica. Atlantis is described as being surrounded by one global ocean. Well, from Antarctica's POV, it seems like there is only one ocean.

posted on Nov, 30 2009 @ 12:49 AM

Originally posted by genius/idoit
It's always bothered me how accurate Edgar Casey's predictions were yet one of his most important predictions seems to be completely wrong

most of his predictions were wrong. dont get me wrong, he got things right, but he made thousands upon thousands of predictions, they werent all as accurate as one might be lead to believe.

posted on Nov, 30 2009 @ 01:34 AM
reply to post by Supernatural

The way that Antarctica's Islands are laid out, don't really fit with what Plato described as the layout for the Island.

posted on Nov, 30 2009 @ 01:40 AM

Originally posted by Supernatural
I also think Atlantis could've been in Antarctica. Atlantis is described as being surrounded by one global ocean. Well, from Antarctica's POV, it seems like there is only one ocean.

I wonder if Atlantis could be the giza plataeu?

I am researching the primordial mount right now. The primordial mount is an island that rose up out of the ocean, which I believe may be what the geat pyramid (Ben-Ben stone) came to rest upon.


[edit on 30-11-2009 by In nothing we trust]

posted on Nov, 30 2009 @ 02:08 AM
cayce also predicted he would return

the guy who believes he is the re-embodied, reincarnated i guess, soul of edgar cayce - david wilcock has the truth to the entire 2012 question. He proposes an amazingly understandable theory of what is going to happen in the time escalating toward our galactic allignment, and honestly, i think it's true. All this bull# about the world ending is nonsense and sickening really, seeing how so many people are fed up enough with life to be waiting for it to ''end''. #, the mayan council of elders came out and SAID the world ain't going to end.

The whole histeria came from the idiot who interpreted the cut-off of the calendar as meaning, "oh # that means we gunn die bob" and spreading this ignorance like an idiot.

The truth, in short, is the 4th consciousness. check out "The 2012 Enigma" i believe it is, or "Shift of the Ages" if you're interested.

Peace n love to all.

posted on Dec, 1 2009 @ 02:17 PM
The problem with putting forward the Antarctic / Arctic as a solution for the problem of a re-emerging Atlantis as predicted by Cayce is that Cayce also said that Atlantis was pretty much where Plato said it was. Off the top of my head, I recall mentions of locations outside the 'Pillars of Hercules', in the Caribbean and the Sargasso Sea. I'm pretty sure if you go look it up, you'll find that Cayce didn't just predict the when but also gave the where.

posted on Dec, 1 2009 @ 03:04 PM
I think the Atlantic Ocean being named after Atlantis must mean something.

Etymology is always a good start when trying to get to the heart of the matter.

posted on Dec, 8 2009 @ 12:29 AM
The whole under the ice, in antarctica things sounds alot like the same scenario on Stargate SG-1. No?

But hey who's to say they OR you are wrong? I'm open to it. And i loved that show LOL.

posted on Dec, 8 2009 @ 01:33 AM
reply to post by skjalddis

But Plato's assertion that Atlantis was beyond the "Pillars of Hercules" (aka the Strait of Gibraltar) basically only meant that you won't find it in the Mediterranean. Beyond that, it could be anywhere.

I've always found the possibility of an Atlantis/Antarctica connection intriguing, taking in to account Piri Reis' map of a portion of Antarctica free of ice with the combination of plate tectonics - which might explain some of the descriptions of the destruction of Atlantis.

I do realize, however, that plate tectonics is a long, long, LONG process and cannot remotely explain the apparent swiftness of Atlantis' demise.

posted on Feb, 14 2015 @ 12:31 AM
I have some far as global warming vs no warming,both groups are is a fact that the ice caps are melting,but it is also a fact that scientists have records going all the way back to the seventeen hundreds where they have been recording what the temperatures around the world it is also Aaron fact that the world is not getting warmer.i will tell you what has changed in recent decades,there has been alot more solar flares cause an increase of volcanic activity.alot of this activity takes places on the ocean floor.which would heat up the water.also,it is very possible some group of government scientists have found atlantis,and their just not telling us,they try to cover up alot of archealogical discoveries,because they disprove evolution.this has been going on for years,you see when atlantis existed we were supposedly having # fights and swinging from branches lolreply to: genius/idoit

posted on Feb, 16 2015 @ 03:24 PM
a reply to: genius/idoit

There a lot of people on here who live to flag, I only flag if I consider the article really wrong. But most of the time just move on, everyone has a right to write their views. Most people now ignore the flags due to the fact that they are abused and the flaggers are usually skeptics, negative people and just unhappy people.

new topics

top topics


log in