It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jthomas
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
reply to post by jthomas
You are avoiding the subject.
You are confused.
There are PLENTY of folk, including first responders who heard explosions. Regardless of whether they prove the existence of explosives in the towers, they heard them.
Are they all liars according to you?
No, according to you.
They didn't hear or see explosives. Lots of things sounded like "explosions" but NO ONE claimed to hear or see "explosives." _BoneZ_ lied about first responders. Apparently, you need to also.
It's the nature of 9/11 "Truth."
Originally posted by jthomas
They didn't hear or see explosives. Lots of things sounded like "explosions" but NO ONE claimed to hear or see "explosives." _BoneZ_ lied about first responders.
Originally posted by RipCurl
I for one would like one of you guys to provide proof that there are paid members here by the govt.
The fact that its ludicrous on its face being the main reason why there aren't any.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by jthomas
They didn't hear or see explosives. Lots of things sounded like "explosions" but NO ONE claimed to hear or see "explosives." _BoneZ_ lied about first responders.
I just went back and looked at my posts and I used "explosions" in every one of them, not "explosives". That means you are lying about what I said.
Originally posted by jthomas
And, of course, you have the perfect opportunity to state for the record right here that you have no positive evidence of "explosives." Let's see you state it right here, _BoneZ_.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by jthomas
And, of course, you have the perfect opportunity to state for the record right here that you have no positive evidence of "explosives." Let's see you state it right here, _BoneZ_.
I can't do that because that would be false. There is positive evidence and it has been shown tirelessly. Just because you deny it doesn't mean there is none.
And before you say "show it", that's not for this thread.
You can see the evidence in any number of my posts in other threads by going to my profile and looking at my posts.
Fighting the Net
"We Must Fight the Net. DoD [Department of Defense] is building an information-centric force. Networks are increasingly the operational center of gravity, and the Department must be prepared to "fight the net."
"DoD's "Defense in Depth" strategy should operate on the premise that the Department will "fight the net" as it would a weapons system."
It should come as no surprise that the Pentagon would aggressively attack the "information highway" in their attempt to achieve dominance in information warfare. Donald Rumsfeld's involvement in the Project for a New American Century sheds more light on the need and desire to control information.
Originally posted by curious_soul
Please everyone who may have a question concerning 911 stop acknowledging the people that use the word "truther". Using the word "truther" does not stregthen their arguement and it's a lame attempt at belittlement.
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
BTW, thanks to everyone who flagged this thread, which put it on the front page.
Originally posted by jerico65
Originally posted by RipCurl
I for one would like one of you guys to provide proof that there are paid members here by the govt.
The fact that its ludicrous on its face being the main reason why there aren't any.
I'm with you. If anyone is a government sponsored debunker, I'd love to get in on some of that sweet coin. I mean, Christmas is coming up and I know I could use some extra cash for the holidays.
Like the proven lies of NIST or the proven lies of the 911 commission report?
Please list them. Also link to peer reviewed articles by respectable journals that address these "lies".
Response to NIST on Control Demolition Investigation Failure
Crockett Grabbe © January 13, 2008
University of Iowa & SeaLane Consulting
www.SeaLane.org
www.physics.uiowa.edu/~cgrabbe
www.sealane.org...
Sorry, but where in this paragraph is anything that rebuts the reports done by NIST and independent researchers who have published in peer reviewed engineering journals?
Response to NIST on Energy and Momentum
Respected Leaders and Families Launch 9/11 Truth Statement Demanding Deeper Investigation into the Events of 9/11
Former Reagan Deputy and Colonel Says 9/11 "Dog That Doesn't Hunt"
The former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under the Reagan Administration and a highly decorated Vietnam veteran and Colonel has gone on the record to voice his doubts about the official story of 9/11 - calling it "the dog that doesn't hunt."
Leading 9/11 Widows Declare 9/11 Commission A Whitewash
September 11 Victim Families who Fought to Create the 9/11 Commission Declare it a Failure on the First Anniversary of the 9/11 Report.
- 9/11 families join researchers to ask independent media and foreign press for help
They don't believe it. Why do you?
The 9/11 Commission co-chairs don't believe the 9/11 Commission Report:
* The 9/11 Commissioners knew that military officials lied to the Commission, and considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements, yet didn't bother to tell the American people (free subscription required).
* The co-chairs of the Commission now admit that the Commission largely operated based upon political considerations.
* Chairman Thomas Kean says that the CIA intentionally impeded the 9/11 Commission's investigation and says “I’m upset that [the government] didn’t tell us the truth.”
* Co-chair Hamilton says of the CIA's cover up and destruction of tapes of interrogation of people allegedly connected with 9/11:
"Did they obstruct our inquiry? The answer is clearly yes," says Lee Hamilton, who co-chaired the 9/11 Commission, in the wake of reports the CIA destroyed videotapes of interrogations of two al-Qaida suspects. "Whether that amounts to a crime, others will have to judge," adds Hamilton.
* Hamilton also says "I don't believe for a minute we got everything right", that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, that the 9/11 debate should continue, and that the 9/11 Commission report was only "the first draft" of history.
Many of the other 9/11 Commissioners don't buy it:
* 9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that "There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn't have access . . . .
* 9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said "We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting"
* Former 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: "It is a national scandal"; "This investigation is now compromised"; and "One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up".
And many other key players in generating the Report don't believe it:
* One of the primary architects of the 9/11 Commission Report, Ernest May, said in May 2005, "We never had full confidence in the interrogation reports as historical sources."
* And the high-level attorney who led the 9/11 staff's inquiry, said "I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described .... The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years.... This is not spin. This is not true."
They don't believe it. Why do you?
www.maya12-21-2012.com...
Louis Freeh Charges 9/11 Commission Cover-Up
9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon
The 9/11 deniers
9/11 panel distrusted Pentagon testimony
"The president ought to be ashamed"
9/11 panel to get access to withheld data
“The White House Has Played Cover-Up”–Former 9/11Commission Member Max Cleland Blasts Bush
There Will Be No Patrick Fitzgerald for the 9/11 Attacks
Classified Letters Regarding FBI Whistleblower Sibel Edmonds
Our Broken System
by Sibel Edmonds
Did the Bush Administration Lie to Congress and the 9/11 Commission?
9/11: Missing Black Boxes in World Trade Center Attacks Found by Firefighters, Analyzed by NTSB, Concealed by FBI
Tape of Air Traffic Controllers Made on 9/11 Was Destroyed
How Osama Cracked FBI's Top 10
Crooked Cops and 9-11
Press Conference of Rep Curt Weldon: 9/11 Commission and Operation "Able Danger"
9/11 Commission suppressed the evidence
Former 6-year Inspector General, U.S. Department of Transportation and former Professor of Aviation, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering and Aviation says "the [9/11] commission is clearly not talking to everybody or not telling us everything .... Huge discrepancies persist in basic facts .... when we heard the carriers and governments alike saying, “Oh, no one could have foreseen this. No one knew that this was coming. No one knew that there was any risk like this in the world,” is absolutely false....
Legal Scholars Question 9/11
yes go on a keep those fingers in your ears.
Scientists, Scholars, Architects & Engineers respond to NIST
Explosives Found in
World Trade Center Dust
Scientists Discover Both Residues
And Unignited Fragments
Of Nano-Engineered Thermitic Pyrotechnics
In Debris From the Twin Towers
The Open Chemical Physics Journal
Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence
for energetic materials
Kevin R. Ryan Æ James R. Gourley Æ
Steven E. Jones
Published online:
The Missing Jolt:
A Simple Refutation of the NIST-Bazant Collapse Hypothesis
Propping Up the War on Terror
Lies about the WTC by NIST and Underwriters Laboratories
KEVIN RYAN
March 28, 2006
Some Physical Chemistry Aspects of Thermite, Thermate, Iron-
Aluminum-Rich Microspheres, the Eutectic, and the Iron-Sulfur
System as Applied to the Demise of Three World Trade Center
Buildings on 9/11/2001
By
Jerry Lobdill
June 15, 2007
Revisiting 9/11/2001 --Applying the Scientific Method
Jones v. Robertson
A physicist and a structural engineer debate the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center
Can Physics Rewrite History?
PROOF THAT THE THERMAL AND GRAVITATIONAL ENERGY
AVAILABLE WERE INSUFFICIENT TO MELT STEEL IN THE TWIN
TOWERS AND 7 WORLD TRADE CENTER ON 9/11/01
By Terry Morrone.
Professor Emeritus of Physics, Adelphi University
Bad Science: Keith Seffen And The WTC 'Collapse'
High Velocity Bursts of Debris From Point-Like Sources in the
WTC Towers
Kevin Ryan, 6/13/2007
Science in the Bush: When Politics Displaces Physics
9/11 and the Twin Towers: Sudden Collapse Initiation was
Impossible
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY TWIN TOWERS THEORY DEBUNKED
Saturday, February 2nd, 2008
Dr Seffen Paper Proven Ludicrous
The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and
Nano-Thermites
Discussion of ”Progressive Collapse of theWorld Trade Center:
A Simple Analysis” by K.A. Seffen